Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: dholakia · Page 1 of about 480 results (0.074 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 17 2002

Sri S.K. Sarma Vs. Mahesh Kumar Verma

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-17-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 138; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 116

Reported in : AIR2002SC3294; 2002(4)ALLMR(SC)580; 2002CriLJ4318; JT2002(7)SC222; 2002(6)SCALE522; (2002)7SCC505; [2002]SUPP2SCR439; 2002(2)LC1443(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Dholakia, Sr. Adv., ; Pradip Tarafdar, ; Parthapratim Ch

M.B. Shah, J.1. Leave granted.2. Short question involved in this appeal is - whether the provisions of Section 138 of the Indian Railways Act, 1890 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Railways Act') can be invoked for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 26 1991

N.K. JaIn and Others Vs. C.K. Shah and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-26-1991

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Factories Act, 1948 - Seciton 8; Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 2, 4, 5, 6, 14(2A) and 17; Indian Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 5; Employees' Provident Fund and Family Pension Fund Act, 1952; Companies Act, 1929 - Sections 74 and 380; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Minimum Wages Act, 1948; C.P. and Berar Industrial Disputes Settlement Act, 1947

Reported in : AIR1991SC1289; 1991CriLJ1347a; 1991(2)Crimes94(SC); [1991(62)FLR657]; (1991)2GLR910; JT1991(2)SC52; (1995)IIILLJ300bSC; 1991(1)SCALE519; (1991)2SCC495; [1991]1SCR938a

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Dholakia and ; Anip Sachthey, Advs.

ORDERK. Jayachandra Reddy, J.1. The question of general importance that arises in these three appeals is whether criminal proceedings can be instituted under Section 14 of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 ('Act'...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 06 1997

Tanviben Pankaj Kumar Divetia Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-06-1997

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 120-B and 302

Reported in : AIR1997SC2193; 1997(2)ALD(Cri)9; 1997(2)BLJR1374; 1997CriLJ2535; 1997(2)Crimes109(SC); (1997)2GLR1346; JT1997(5)SC233; 1997(4)SCALE33; (1997)7SCC156; [1997]Supp1SCR96; 1997

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Dhokakia, ; S. Hazarika and ; H. Wahi, Advs.

ORDERG.N. Ray, J.1. This appeal unfolds a very sad incident where on account of murder of her mother in-law, the appellant has been convicted for such murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC not...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 31 2001

State of Gujarat and ors. Vs. Pratamsingh Narsinh Parmar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-31-2001

Subject : ServiceLabour and Industrial

Acts : Labour Law;Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 25F;Service Law;Gujarat Non-Secretariat Clerks, Clerks-Typists and Typists (Direct Recruitment Procedure) Rules, 1970;Constitution of India - Article 309

Reported in : [2001(89)FLR323]; JT2001(3)SC326; (2001)ILLJ1118SC; (2001)9SCC713; (2001)2UPLBEC956; 2001ICLR968

ORDER1. This appeal by the State of Gujarat is directed against the judgment of the Division Bench of the Gujarat High Court which upheld the judgment of the learned single Judge of the said High Court....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 13 1972

Dharma Rama Bhagare Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-13-1972

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1973SC476; 1973CriLJ680; (1973)1SCC537; [1973]3SCR92

Advocate for Respondent : H.R. Khanna and ; B.D. Sharma, Advs.

I.D. Dua, J.1. The appellant in this appeal by special leave (accused No. 1 in the trial court) was convicted by the Second Additional Sessions Judge of Thana of offences under Section 148, 323 and 302,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 08 2000

Mayurakshi Cotton Mills and Ors. Vs. Panchra Mayurkshi Cotton Mills Em ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-08-2000

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25F and 25G; Constitution of India - Articles 12 and 21

Reported in : AIR2000SC1206; [2000(85)FLR168]; JT2000(3)SC104; (2000)ILLJ1096SC; (2000)IIMLJ130(SC); 2000(2)SCALE287; (2000)3SCC446; [2000]2SCR189; 2000(1)LC796(SC); (2000)2UPLBEC953

S. Rajendra Babu, J.1. The appellant mills was purchased by the State of West Bengal in the year 1990 in the course of liquidation proceedings initiated pursuant to orders made by the BIFR. It is the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 1973

Nagindas Ramdas Vs. Dalpatram Ichharam Alias Brijram and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-30-1973

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Transfer of Property Act - Sections 106; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 12(3), 13 and 28; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 23, Rule 3; Evidence Act - Secitons 58

Reported in : AIR1974SC471; (1974)1SCC242; [1974]2SCR544

Advocate for Respondent : P.H. Parekh and ; Sunanda Bhandare, Advs.

Sarkaria, J.1. Whether the decree dated September 23, 1964, passed by the Trial judge in Regular Suit No, 6 of 1963, filed under the Bombay Rent Control Act, 1947 (for short, called Bombay Rent Act) directing...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 04 2011

Birla Corporation Ltd. Vs. Birla Education Trust and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-04-2011

Subject : Education

1. In these two appeals, under challenge is an order of the Company Law Board, Principal Bench dated 11 July 2011. This order was passed in an interlocutory proceeding registered as C.A. no. 332 of 2011...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 20 1994

JaIn Engineering Company Vs. Collector of Customs, Bombay

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-20-1994

Subject : Customs

Reported in : 1994(72)ELT785(SC); JT1994(5)SC79; 1994(3)SCALE355; 1994Supp(3)SCC130

B.L. Hansaria, J.1. The appeal out of which this review petition arises was disposed of on February 2, 1994. The judgment of that date noted in its paragraph 2 that the appellant had been given the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 17 2009

Naval Gent Maritime Limited Vs. Shivnath Rai HarnaraIn (i) Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-17-2009

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 34, 44, 46, 47, 48, 48(1), 48(2), 48(3) and 66; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 17; Registration Act - Sections 17(1) and 17(2); Foreign Awards Act; Indian Stamp Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 44A

Reported in : 174(2009)DLT391

Advocate for Respondent : Chetan Sharam, Sr. Adv.,; Anshuj Dhingra and; Anubhav Mehro

Shiv Narayan Dhingra, J.1. The Execution Petitioner/Decree Holder filed this petition/application for enforcement of foreign award dated 22.1.2001 under Part II Chapter I of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996. Along with the petition, the petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial