Advanced Search Results

District and Sessions Judge Vs. Ratnesh Kumar Srivastava and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226, 235 and 335; Subordinate Civil Courts Ministerial Establishment Rules, 1947 - Rule 5; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 4 and 114; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100 - Order 39, Rule 1

Reported in : 2005(1)ESC724; (2005)2UPLBEC1156

Advocate for Respondent : Asoke Khare and ;V.K. Srivastava, Advs. and ;S.C.

B.S. Chauhan, J.1. These Special Appeals have been filed against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 8.12.2004 staying the operation of the order dated 30th October, 2004 passed by the District Judge, Baghpat, by...

Dilip Kumar Singha Vs. Abodh Gopal Ghosh

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 - Section 13(1)

Reported in : AIR1973Cal473,77CWN515

Advocate for Respondent : Maloy Kumar Basu and ;Dhirendra Kumar Das, Advs.

Salil Kumar Datta, J.1. This is an appeal by the defendant against a judgment of affirmance. The facts as stated in the plaint are as follows:The defendant had been a monthly tenant under the plaintiff at...

Prem Sagar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(1), 5A, 6 and 6(3); Urban Development Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 7, Rule 11; Constitution of India - Article 226; Administrative Law

Reported in : 2005(85)DRJ564

Advocate for Respondent : Tamali Wad, Adv. for R-1, ; S.S. Dalal, Adv. for R-3, ; San

T.S. Thakur, J.1. The impugned declaration under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act was issued more than 32 years before the filing of these petitions. That kind of delay is manifestly inordinate. The only question...

Mrs. Neena Girish Vs. Bihar State Housing Board and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Civil

Aftab Alam, J.1. The petitioner challenges the demand made by the Bihar State Hosing Board ('the Board' hereinafter) for payment of a sum of Rs. 3,19,244.00 as outstanding dues as on 28-2-1999 before it would hand...

Mrs. Kanchan Sanjay Gujar Vs. Mr. Sanjay Bhikan Gujar

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Family Courts Act - Sections 9, 13, 13(1), 13(1A), 19, 23, 23(1) and 26; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 23; Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 - Sections 18, 20 and 25

Reported in : AIR2009Bom151; 2009(111)BomLR3459

Advocate for Respondent : A.A. Kumbhakoni and ;T.D. Deshmukh, Advs.

B.H. Marlapalle, J.1. This appeal filed under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act read with Section 23 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 ('the Act' for short) arises from the judgment and order dated 10/12/2003...

Dharanidhar Panda and anr. and Muralidhar Nath and anr. Vs. State of O ...

Court : Orissa

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : I(2005)ACC333; 2006ACJ487; AIR2005Ori36; 98(2004)CLT706

Advocate for Respondent : Rangadhar Behera, Adv. for School and Mass Education Dept

A.K. Patnaik, J.1. On the date of Ganesh Puja on 6.9.1997 at about 4 P.M. two school children, namely, Dhirendra Kumar Panda and Mamata Kumari Nath, while playing with other children in Kelikadamba Primary School at...

Quiteria Fernandes and Others Vs. State of Goa, Through Collector and ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. Heard. Admit. Ms. P. Kamat, learned Additional Government Advocate waives service for the respondents. 2. By this appeal, the appellants/plaintiffs are challenging the order dated 5/9/2014 (below application Exhibit 13) passed by the learned District...

Abdul Sattar Haji Usman and Another Vs. The Archbishop of Bombay and O ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. The suit seeks declaration of ownership of the Plaintiffs and Defendant No.3 of a plot of land and challenges acquisition of the plot by the State Government under the Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971 as...

Abhishek Saxena Vs. The State Of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

1 REPORTABLE2023INSC1088IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.3628 OF2023(Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No.1431/2020) ABHISHEK SAXENA Appellant(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. Respondent(s) ORDER Leave granted.1. This appeal is...

Reserve Bank of India Vs. Palai Central Bank Ltd.

Court : Kerala

Subject : BankingCommercial

Acts : Banking Companies Act, 1949 - Sections 22, 35(4), 38(1) and 38(3); ;Constitution of India - Articles 5, 13, 14, 19, 19(1) and 367; General Clause Act, 1897 - Sections 3(42); Reserve Bank Act - Sections 38 and 42

Reported in : AIR1961Ker268; [1961]31CompCas154(Ker)

Advocate for Respondent : Cherian Manjooran,; K.S. Sebastian and;M.M. Thomas; K.M.

ORDERP.T. Raman Nayar, J.1. By this application brought under Section 38(3)(b)(iii) of the Banking Companies Act, 1949, the Reserve Bank of India seeks the winding up of a hanking company called the Palai Central Bank Ltd....