Advanced Search Results

Contempt Proceedings Vs. Kanwar Singh Saini Overruled

Court : Delhi

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 15(2), 18, 18(1), 19 and 19(1); M.R.T.P. Act - Sections 5 and 13B; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rules 1, 2 and 2A; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860; Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : 161(2009)DLT466

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Vijay Aggarwal

ORDERP.K. Bhasin, J.1. A Reference was made to this Court by a Civil Judge for initiation of contempt proceedings against one Kanwar Singh Saini, who was the sole defendant in a Civil Suit for injunction (hereinafter...

Chitru Devi Vs. Smt. Ram Dei and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 35 and 90; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 100

Reported in : AIR2002HP59

Advocate for Respondent : Deepak Gupta, Adv.

Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J.1. This is plaintiffs second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 against the judgment and decree dated 29-9-1997 of Disrict Judge, Kullu in Civil Appeal No. 33/1996 whereby...

Krishni and ors. Vs. Amar Nath and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : I(1997)ACC251

Advocate for Respondent : Bhupender Gupta and Deepak Gupta, Advs.

Arun Kumar Goel, J.1. Brief facts giving rise to this appeal are that appellants filed a claim petition before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Shimla Division, Camp at Bilaspur, against the respondent No. 1, Amar Nath,...

Balkishan Sharma Vs. Mithlesh Gupta

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 3 and 14(1); ;Delhi Rent Control (Amendment) Act, 1988

Reported in : 80(1999)DLT102

Advocate for Respondent : Deepak Gupta and ; B.B. Gupta, Advs.

Manmohan Sarin, J. 1. The learned Additional Rent Controller passed an order of eviction on the ground specified under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, hereinafter referred to as the Act, dismissing the...

Sanjay Mehra and ors. Vs Sunil Malhotra and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Delhi Rent Control

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14 (1) (a), (c), 14(1)(K), 14(l)(b), 25 B (4)(5), 14(7) ; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Section 372

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Deepak Gupta ; Mr. Gaurav Shanker, Advs.

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes3. Whether the judgment should be reported in Digest? Yes1. An order dated 3rd...

Damyanti Dhavan and anr. Vs. New India Assurance Company

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Motor VehiclesCivil

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Section 168

Reported in : 1997ACJ296,AIR1996HP106

Advocate for Respondent : Deepak Gupta, Adv.

Arun Kumar Goel, J.1. This appeal has arisen out of award of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Shimla in MAC No. 6-S/2/1989/88 dated 20-9-1990 whereby compensation of Rs. 25,000/- has been awarded in favour of the appellants...

Uco Bank Vs. Gorkhi Ram and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 60, 97 and 97(1) - Order 21 Rules 43 and 54; ;Himanchal Pradesh Debt Reduction Act, 1976 - Section 21; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976

Reported in : [1993]76CompCas795(HP)

Advocate for Respondent : Deepak Gupta, Adv.

D.P. Sood, J.1. The UCO Bank is the decree-holder pursuant to the decree passed in their favour and against the judgment-debtors. They moved an application under Order 21, Rules 43 and 54 of the Code of...

Eicher Limited Through Bimal Sachdeva Vs. Himachal Pradesh Housing Boa ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : PropertyCommercial

Acts : Himachal Pradesh Housing Board Act, 1972 - Section 27

Reported in : AIR2002HP135

Advocate for Respondent : Deepak Gupta and; J.R. Thakur, Advs.

ORDERKuldip Chand Sood, J.1. By this petition, under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, plaintiff-applicant seeks to restrain the defendant/non-applicant from taking any steps to recover...

Rita Devi Vs. Karam Chand Balia and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Section 13

Reported in : I(2004)DMC242

Advocate for Respondent : Deepak Gupta, Adv. for the Respondent No. 1

Arun Kumar Goel, J.1. By means of impugned judgment and decree, marriage between appellant-wife and respondent No. 1-husband stands dissolved. They have two children, i.e. daughter about 10 years and son about 9 years old. Admittedly...

Bishan Dass and ors. Vs. New Prem Bus Service and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Kanwar and; Deepak Gupta, Advs.

Kamlesh Sharma, J.1. This court proposes to dispose of these three appeals [F.A.O. (MVA) Nos. 214, 215 and 216 of 1984] by a common judgment as these pertain to the same accident and also arisen out...