Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: debal banerjee · Page 1 of about 74 results (0.053 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 05 2009

Official Liquidator, High Court Vs. UjjaIn Nagar Palika Nigam and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-05-2009

Subject : Company

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1956; ;Companies Act, 1956 - Section 530, 530(1) and 530(8); ;Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 154

Reported in : [2009]149CompCas446(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : Debal Banerjee, ;D. Basak and ;Sandip Kumar Basu, Advs. for respondent No. 1, ;C.K. Dutta and ;Asit Ranjan Nandy, Advs. for respondent No. 2 and ;P.C. Sen, ;P.K. Dutta and ;Sandip Ghosh, Advs. for res

Dipankar Datta, J.1. Ujjain Pipe and Foundry Co. Ltd. (hereafter 'the company in liquidation') having registered office in Kolkata, had its factory located in Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh. It became sick and was ultimately directed to be...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 2008

Himadri Chemicals and Industries Ltd. Vs. Indian Oil Corporation

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-31-2008

Subject : Banking

Acts : Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970; ;Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 9

Reported in : 2008(3)CHN740

Advocate for Respondent : Debal Banerjee, Adv. for Central Bank of India

1. We have heard the Counsel for the appellant at length. Undoubtedly, the guarantee executed by the appellant is unconditional in nature. We may make a reference here to the bank guarantee in which the bank...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 12 2002

Anoop Kumar Vs. Commissioner of Cus. (Prev.)

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-12-2002

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2(33), 125, 130(1) and 143; ;Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1982 - Rule 41; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2004(93)ECC149,2002LC316(Calcutta),2002(145)ELT48(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : Debal Banerjee, Adv.

Dilip Kumar Seth, J.Facts :1. Certain goods were imported under a special import licence. These are described as walkie-talkie toys. The customs authority had refused to release the goods on the ground that those are not...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 28 1988

Mackinnon Mackenzie and Co. Ltd. Vs. Collr. of Customs (Appeals)

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-28-1988

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Section 116

Reported in : 1989(43)ELT36(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : Debal Banerjee, Adv.

Manoranjan Mallick, J.1. This writ petition is directed against the order passed by the Deputy Collector Customs the Respondent No. 2 on 17th September 1985 imposing a penalty of a sum of Rs. 48,621/- for the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 07 2007

Kiran Subbha and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-07-2007

Subject : Service

Acts : West Bengal School Service Commission Act, 1997 - Sections 7, 9 and 15; ;National Commission for Minority Educational Institutions Act, 2004 - Sections 10, 11, 12A, 12B and 12C; ;Management Rules, 1969 - Rules 8(3), 8(3A), 28 and 33; ;Darjeeling Gorkha Hill Council Act, 1988 - Sections 29 and 70; ;National Commission of Minorities Act, 1992 - Section 2; ;West Bengal Board of Secondary Education Act, 1963 - Sections 10, 19(3), 19A(3) and 45; ;School Service Commission Act; ;Constitution of India - Articles 26 and 30 and 30(1); ;School Service Commission Rules - Rule 7(2)

Reported in : 2008(2)CHN530

Advocate for Respondent : Jayanta Mitra, ;Debal Banerjee and ;B.P. Subba for DGHC respondent No. 6 in W.P. No. 2153 (W) of 2003, ;Suprokash Banerjee, ;Abhijit Gangopadhyay and ;Banhi Ray, Advs. for respondent No. 7 in W.P. No.

Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta, J.1. The above writ petition and the appeal being MAT No. 52/04 with FMA No. 1713/03 are heard together as the principal point of controversy involved in those matters are interlinked with each...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 19 2019

Dr. Swapan Kumar Banerjee Vs. The State of West Bengal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-19-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Parijat Sinha

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S).232-233 OF2015DR. SWAPAN KUMAR BANERJEE APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ANR. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT DEEPAK GUPTA, J.The short question raised in these...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 17 2014

Jawahar Lal Vig Vs. The State of Jharkhand Through the Principal Secre ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Dec-17-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 6138 of 2012 XLRI School of Business and Human Resources through its Secretary, Jamshedpur, East Singhbhum … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 17 2014

Hi Tech Heritage Limited Through Its Director Shri Anup Kumar Sinha Vs ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Dec-17-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 6138 of 2012 XLRI School of Business and Human Resources through its Secretary, Jamshedpur, East Singhbhum … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 17 2014

Raghubir Singh Bhatia Vs. The State of Jharkhand Thro the Principal Se ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Dec-17-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 6138 of 2012 XLRI School of Business and Human Resources through its Secretary, Jamshedpur, East Singhbhum … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 17 2014

Center for Inner Resources Development Through Authorised Representati ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Dec-17-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 6138 of 2012 XLRI School of Business and Human Resources through its Secretary, Jamshedpur, East Singhbhum … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial