Advanced Search Results

Annada Prosad and ors. Vs. Manotosan Roy

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Media and CommunicationCriminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Section 499

Reported in : AIR1953Cal503,56CWN705

Advocate for Respondent : Debabrata Mukherjee, Adv.

ORDERK.C. Chunder, J.1. This is a Rule at the instance of three persons who had been accused under Section 500. Penal Code by the complainant opposite party one Manotosan Roy of having defamed him in an...

C.R. Bansi Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 161, 164 and 165;

Reported in : AIR1971SC786; 1971CriLJ662; (1970)3SCC537; [1971]3SCR236

Advocate for Respondent : Debabrata Mukherjee, ; H.R. Khanna, ; and S.P. Nayar, Adv.

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal No. 834 of 1965.Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated October 19, 24, 1964 of the Bombay High Court in Criminal Appeal No. 1330 of 1964.A. S. R....

ibra Akanda and ors. Vs. Emperor

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1944Cal339

Lodge, J.1. This is an appeal from convictions and sentences under Section 304 (2), Penal Code, read with Section 34. The four appellants were tried by the Sessions Judge of Pabna and Bogra and a common...

Sk. Abdul Karim and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 22(5) and 32; Preventive Detention Act, 1950 - Sections 3(2), 8 and 13

Reported in : AIR1969SC1028; 1969CriLJ1446; (1969)1SCC433; [1969]3SCR479

Advocate for Respondent : Dabarata Mukherjee, Adv.

1. In this case the petitioners have obtained a rule calling upon the respondent, viz., the State of West Bengal, to show cause why a writ of habeas corpus should not be issued under Article 32...

Joydeb Dana Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Preventive Detention Act - Sections 3(2) and 7

Reported in : 1969(1)LC1(SC)

Ramaswami, J. 1. In this case the petitioners have obtained a rule calling upon the respondent, viz., The State of West Bengal to show cause why a writ of habeas corpus should not be issued under...

Pushkar Mukherjee and 29 ors. Vs. the State of West Bengal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India Articles 22 and 32; Preventive Detention Act, 1950 - Sections 3(1), (2) and 11(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302 and 398; Detention Order

Reported in : AIR1970SC852; 1970CriLJ852; (1969)1SCC10; [1969]2SCR635

Ramaswami, J.1. In this case the petitioners have obtained a rule calling upon the respondent, viz. The State of West Bengal to show cause why a writ of habeas corpus should not be issued under Article...

State of Gujarat Vs. Haidarali Kalubhai

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code Sections 299, 300, 302, 304, 304-A, 323 and 326; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 162 and 342

Reported in : 1976ACJ258; AIR1976SC1012; 1976CriLJ732; (1976)1SCC889; [1976]3SCR303; 1976(8)LC310(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : K.J. Shethna, ; Vimal Dave and ; Kailash Mehta, Advs.

P.K. Goswami, J.1. The accused Haidarli Kalubhai was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Mehsana under Section 304 Part II, Indian Penal Code, and was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for seven years for causing death of Mohamadali...

Dhirendra Nath Das Vs. Hrishikesh Mukherjee and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Section 147;

Reported in : AIR1951Cal93,55CWN594

Advocate for Respondent : Ajit Kumar Dutt and ;Samarendra Nath Banerjee, Advs.

Harries, C.J.1. This is a reference to a F. B. made by a Bench of this Ct. in a matter arising out of proceedings Under Section 147, Cr. P. C.2. The facts giving rise to these...

In Re: Abani Kanta Pal

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Partnership Act, 1932 - Section 69(1), 69(2) and 69(3); ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17

Reported in : AIR1986Cal143,89CWN1158

Advocate for Respondent : Saktinath Mukherjee and ;Sephali Mukherjee, Advs.

M.M. Dutt, J. 1. This application under Section 115 of the Civil P.C. filed at the instance of the plaintiff is directed against Order No. 108 dt Nov. 19, 1984 of the learned Assistant District Judge,...

Nagendra Nath Bhowmik and ors. Vs. the King

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1950CriLJ1

Harries, C.J.1. This is an appeal by six persons who were convicted of an offence under Section 395 (2), Calcutta Municipal Act, and each sentenced to pay a fine of RSection 1000 and in default of...