Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: debabrata karan · Page 1 of about 6 results (0.037 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 20 2008

Smt. Rinku Mondal (Biswas) and Smt. Sarifunnessa Vs. Union of India (U ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-20-2008

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2008)2CALLT439(HC),2008(3)CHN602

Advocate for Respondent : Debabrata Karan, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 2 to 4

1. When this appeal was called out, Mr. Indranil Chakraborty, learned Counsel appearing for the Appellants, submitted that he is pressing this Appeal only qua the Appellant No. 1 [i.e. Smt. Rinku Mondal Biswas], He states...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 14 2010

Mridula Ghosh and anr. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-14-2010

Subject : Service

Acts : School Service Commission Act, 1997 - Section 9; ;West Bengal College Service Commission Act, 1978

Advocate for Respondent : Debabrata Karan, Adv.

Ashim Kumar Banerjee, J.1. BACKDROP:Mridula Ghosh, the appellant No. 1 above named was the Assistant Teacher of Work Education in Sasibhusan Dutta Girls High School in the District of Birbhum. She was appointed as such by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 01 2007

Bengal Dental College and Research Institute Vs. the State of West Ben ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-01-2007

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Dentists Act, 1948 - Sections 3 and 10A; ;Dental Council of India (Establishment of New Dental Colleges, Opening of New or Higher Course of Study or Training and Increase of Admission Capacity in Dental Colleges) Regulations, 2006 - Regulation 6(2); ;Dental Council of India (Establishment of New Dental Colleges, Opening of New or Higher Course of Study or Training and Increase of Admission Capacity in Dental Colleges) Regulations, 1993

Reported in : (2007)2CALLT587(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : Debabrata Karan and ;Janardan Mandal, Advs.

Jayanta Kumar Biswas, J.1. The petitioner is a registered society. It is aggrieved by the decision of the Director of Medical Education and Ex Officio Secretary, Department of Health and Family Welfare, Government of West Bengal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 18 2007

Ainul Haque and ors. Vs. State of W.B. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-18-2007

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 11

Reported in : 2007(4)CHN35

Advocate for Respondent : Debabrata Karan, Adv., ;Mrinal Kanti Das and ;Subhabrata Das, Advs. for respondent No. 11, ;Jaweed Yusuf, Adv. for respondent No. 7, ;Samiran Mondal, Adv. for respondent No. 4 and ;Sudipta Panda, Adv.

Dipankar Datta, J.1. The petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 24.4.2007 passed by the Chairperson, Bankura Municipality. By the said order, complaint lodged by the petitioners was disposed of in purported compliance with the order...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 01 2008

Suresh Singh Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Oct-01-2008

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Calcutta High Court Rules - Rule 20

Reported in : 2008(4)CHN785

Advocate for Respondent : Chameli Majumder and ;Debabrata Karan, Advs.

Soumitra Pal, J.1. Facts of the case are that on 31st October, 1995 the petitioner was appointed Assistant Teacher in Netaji Vidyalaya F.P. School. At the time of appointment he was undergoing B.Ed. course in the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 03 2007

Radha Giri (Pradhan) Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Oct-03-2007

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 141, 162 and 226

Reported in : 2008(2)CHN661

Advocate for Respondent : Balai Chandra Roy, ;Santi Das, ;Saikat Banerjee, ;Debabrata Karan, Advs., ;Kamalesh Bhattacharjee, ;Mojnu Sk. and ;Sk. Mustak Ali, Advs. for writ petitioner and ;Fazle Rabi, Adv. for respondent No. 6

S.S. Nijjar, C.J.1. We have heard the learned Counsel for the parties at length. We have perused the order passed by the learned Single Judge which reads as under:The petitioner is permitted to appear for the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial