Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: dangre · Page 1 of about 209 results (0.041 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 14 2008

Shri Mohan S/O. Gopalrao Mate Vs. Principal Secretary, Urban Developme ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-14-2008

Subject : Property

Acts : Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 10(3), 20, 20(1), 20(2), 21, 21(1), 21(2) and 23; Urban Land (Ceiling And Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999 - Sections 3 and 3(1); Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966; General Clause Act - Sections 21; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 52(1), 249 and 250

Reported in : 2008(6)ALLMR41; 2009(1)BomCR275; (2008)110BOMLR2696

Advocate for Respondent : B.H. Dangre, AGP

D.D. Sinha, J.1. Rule made returnable forthwith by the consent of Mr.C.V.Kale, Counsel for Petitioner, Mr.S.V.Akolkar, Adv. for Intervenor and Mrs.Dangre, Additional Government Pleader for Respondents. Heard the learned Counsel for the respective parties.2. Counsel for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 05 2003

Mohammad GayasuddIn Son of Wali Mohammad Vs. the State of Maharashtra, ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-05-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act - Sections 3 and 25; Prevention of Terrorists Act, 2002 - Sections 3(3), 3/25, (5), 18, 21 (2), 22, 22(2), 22 (3), 32 and 50; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 24, 27, 30 and 34; Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967; ;Terrorist And Disruptive Activities Prevention Act 1987 - Sections 15 and 15(1); ;Terrorist And Disruptive Activities Prevention Act (Amending) Act, 1993 - Sections 15; Bankers Book Evidence Act, 1891 - Sections 4; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 325, 363 and 368; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 149, 154, 156(3), 162, 164, 167(2), 173, 281, 190, 439 and 463

Reported in : 2003BomCR(Cri)1727; 2003CriLJ2994

Advocate for Respondent : Bharti Dangre, Additional Public Prosecutor

D.D. Sinha, J. 1. Heard Mr. Manohar, learned counsel for the appellant and Mrs. Dangre, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent.2. The appellant has preferred Criminal Appeal No. 679 of 2002 against the order, dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 29 2003

NitIn Jairam Gadkari Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-29-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 200, 201 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 190 and 210; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 190

Reported in : 2004(4)MhLj419

Advocate for Respondent : A.G. Muzumdar, Additional Public Prosecutor and ;Harish Dangre, Adv.

D.D. Sinha, J.1. Heard Mr. Gilda, learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. Muzumdar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent No. 1 and Mr. Dangre, learned counsel for respondent No. 2 in Criminal Revision Application No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 08 2001

Fattesingh Pancham Ghodke Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-08-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 32, 300, 302 and 307; Evidence Act

Reported in : II(2002)DMC378; 2002(1)MhLj491

Advocate for Respondent : Dangre, A.P.P.

J.N. Patel, J.1. The appellant Fattesingh s/o Pancham Ghodke, was tried by the 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur on the charge of having committed murder by intentionally and knowingly causing death of his wife Smt Sharda...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 2011

Jitendra S/O Manindranath Bose Vs. the State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Aug-11-2011

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Section 49, 11, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 58, 139 and 149; Contract Act, 1872 - Section 56(1)(2), 65

1. This reference before the Full Bench has been made on 26th of April, 2011 in view of the apparent conflict in view expressed by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of M/s...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 05 2009

Western Coalfields Ltd. Through the Chief General Manager Vs. the Stat ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-05-2009

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617; Coal Mines (Nationalization) Act, 1973 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 4, 4(2), 5, 5(1), 5(2), 6, 10(1), 11, 11(1), 11(2), 64, 64(4), 68 and 69; Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 3(1), 9, 9(1), 10, 10 (1), 10(2), 11, 11(1) and 11(2); Land Acquisition Act; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 5(1), 7(2), 13 and 18; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Rules; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1948; International Airports Authority Act, 1971 - Sections 12, 12 (1), 12(3), 21 to 24 , 31, 33 and 34; Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 - Sections 123, 124 and 127A(2); Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act. 1956 - Sections 136; Madhya Pradesh Panchayats

Reported in : 2009(4)BomCR414; 2009(111)BomLR502

Advocate for Respondent : Bharati Dangre, Additional Government Pleader, ;T.R. Kankale, Asst. Govt. Pleaders, ;D.B. Patel and ;R.N. Kothari, Advs.

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.1. Common question involved in all these Writ Petitions is, .whether State Government can levy and demand any sum as amount of nonagricultural assessment from Petitioners WCL.... Petitioner- Company is incorporated under the Companies...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 12 2010

Baliram S/O Ramaji Ghate, Aged About 78 Years, Vs. 1] State of Maharas ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Aug-12-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

Acts : Land Acquisition Act - Section 4,6,18; Urban Land Act, 1976 - Sections 6,7,10(1),10(3),42

Advocate for Respondent : Mrs. B.H. Dangre,Adv.

1] The Question referred to this Full Bench for consideration is :"Whether the State can, in respect of the land though covered at the relevant time under the provisions of the ULC Act, but acquired subsequently...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 02 2008

Gajanan Bhaurao Waghmare and Madhukar Fakiraji Sute Vs. State of Mahar ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-02-2008

Subject : Civil

Acts : Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Township Act, 1965 - Sections 2(6), 9(1), 11, 11(1), 15, 21 and 321; Maharashtra Municipal Council and Nagar Panchayats (Qualifications and Appointments of Nominated Councilors) Rules, 2006 - Rules 3 and 5

Reported in : 2008(4)ALLMR349; 2008(3)MhLj225

Advocate for Respondent : B.H. Dangre, Addl. G.P. for Respondents 1 and 2 in W.P. Nos. 14 and 234 of 2007, ;A. Dhore, Adv. holding for Anjan De, Adv. for Respondent No. 3 in W.P. No. 14 of 2007, ;D.P. Thakre, AGP for Responden

R.C. Chavan, J.1. Rule in W.P. No. 234/2007. Returnable forthwith. Heard finally at this stage with the group of connected petitions.2. By these petitions, the petitioners question the validity of amended Rules 3 and 5 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 08 2007

Citizen Forum Maharashtra Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-08-2007

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Bombay Primary Education Act, 1947 - Sections 13(2); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 21; Secondary School Code - Rules 52.1 and 54.2

Reported in : 2007(5)ALLMR330; 2007(5)BomCR49; 2007(5)MhLj485

Advocate for Respondent : B.H. Dangre, A.G.P. in W.P. Nos. 1165, 2191 and 2367/2007

Joshi A.H., J.1. Writ Petition No. 1165 of 2007 is filed by Citizen Forum Maharashtra through Dr. Ashok Lanjewar. Writ Petition No. 2191 of 2007 is filed by Maharashtra Rajya Prathainik Shikshak Samiti, Amravati, and Writ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 06 2008

Damodhar Laxmanrao Kumbodh by Lrs. Pramod S/O Damodarrao Kumbodh and o ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : May-06-2008

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act - Sections 4, 4(1), 5A, 5A(2), 6, 6(1), 7, 8, 9, 9(1), 11, 11A, 17(1), 17(2), 17(4), 23(1), 48 and 48(1); Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 226; Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985

Reported in : 2008(4)ALLMR589; 2008(5)MhLj123

Advocate for Respondent : Bharti Dangre, Addl. G.P. for respondents Nos. 1, 3 and 4,; J.D. Dharmadhikari, Adv. for respondent No. 5 and; V.G. Palshikar, Adv. for respondent No. 7;Anand Parchure, Adv.

R.C. Chavan, J.1. The petitioners seek to have proceedings for acquisition of their lands bearing Survey Nos. 25, 28/1 and 28/2 at village Bhaipur, Tahsil Arvi, District Wardha quashed on the following grounds:(i) Petitioners had developed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial