Advanced Search Results

Shri Mohan S/O. Gopalrao Mate Vs. Principal Secretary, Urban Developme ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 10(3), 20, 20(1), 20(2), 21, 21(1), 21(2) and 23; Urban Land (Ceiling And Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999 - Sections 3 and 3(1); Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966; General Clause Act - Sections 21; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 52(1), 249 and 250

Reported in : 2008(6)ALLMR41; 2009(1)BomCR275; (2008)110BOMLR2696

Advocate for Respondent : B.H. Dangre, AGP

D.D. Sinha, J.1. Rule made returnable forthwith by the consent of Mr.C.V.Kale, Counsel for Petitioner, Mr.S.V.Akolkar, Adv. for Intervenor and Mrs.Dangre, Additional Government Pleader for Respondents. Heard the learned Counsel for the respective parties.2. Counsel for...

Mohammad GayasuddIn Son of Wali Mohammad Vs. the State of Maharashtra, ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act - Sections 3 and 25; Prevention of Terrorists Act, 2002 - Sections 3(3), 3/25, (5), 18, 21 (2), 22, 22(2), 22 (3), 32 and 50; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 24, 27, 30 and 34; Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967; ;Terrorist And Disruptive Activities Prevention Act 1987 - Sections 15 and 15(1); ;Terrorist And Disruptive Activities Prevention Act (Amending) Act, 1993 - Sections 15; Bankers Book Evidence Act, 1891 - Sections 4; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 325, 363 and 368; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 149, 154, 156(3), 162, 164, 167(2), 173, 281, 190, 439 and 463

Reported in : 2003BomCR(Cri)1727; 2003CriLJ2994

Advocate for Respondent : Bharti Dangre, Additional Public Prosecutor

D.D. Sinha, J. 1. Heard Mr. Manohar, learned counsel for the appellant and Mrs. Dangre, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent.2. The appellant has preferred Criminal Appeal No. 679 of 2002 against the order, dated...

NitIn Jairam Gadkari Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 200, 201 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 190 and 210; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 190

Reported in : 2004(4)MhLj419

Advocate for Respondent : A.G. Muzumdar, Additional Public Prosecutor and ;Harish Dangre, Adv.

D.D. Sinha, J.1. Heard Mr. Gilda, learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. Muzumdar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent No. 1 and Mr. Dangre, learned counsel for respondent No. 2 in Criminal Revision Application No....

Fattesingh Pancham Ghodke Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 32, 300, 302 and 307; Evidence Act

Reported in : II(2002)DMC378; 2002(1)MhLj491

Advocate for Respondent : Dangre, A.P.P.

J.N. Patel, J.1. The appellant Fattesingh s/o Pancham Ghodke, was tried by the 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur on the charge of having committed murder by intentionally and knowingly causing death of his wife Smt Sharda...

Jitendra S/O Manindranath Bose Vs. the State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Section 49, 11, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 58, 139 and 149; Contract Act, 1872 - Section 56(1)(2), 65

1. This reference before the Full Bench has been made on 26th of April, 2011 in view of the apparent conflict in view expressed by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of M/s...

Western Coalfields Ltd. Through the Chief General Manager Vs. the Stat ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617; Coal Mines (Nationalization) Act, 1973 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 4, 4(2), 5, 5(1), 5(2), 6, 10(1), 11, 11(1), 11(2), 64, 64(4), 68 and 69; Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 3(1), 9, 9(1), 10, 10 (1), 10(2), 11, 11(1) and 11(2); Land Acquisition Act; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 5(1), 7(2), 13 and 18; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Rules; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1948; International Airports Authority Act, 1971 - Sections 12, 12 (1), 12(3), 21 to 24 , 31, 33 and 34; Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 - Sections 123, 124 and 127A(2); Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act. 1956 - Sections 136; Madhya Pradesh Panchayats

Reported in : 2009(4)BomCR414; 2009(111)BomLR502

Advocate for Respondent : Bharati Dangre, Additional Government Pleader, ;T.R. Kankale, Asst. Govt. Pleaders, ;D.B. Patel and ;R.N. Kothari, Advs.

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.1. Common question involved in all these Writ Petitions is, .whether State Government can levy and demand any sum as amount of nonagricultural assessment from Petitioners WCL.... Petitioner- Company is incorporated under the Companies...

Baliram S/O Ramaji Ghate, Aged About 78 Years, Vs. 1] State of Maharas ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Land Acquisition

Acts : Land Acquisition Act - Section 4,6,18; Urban Land Act, 1976 - Sections 6,7,10(1),10(3),42

Advocate for Respondent : Mrs. B.H. Dangre,Adv.

1] The Question referred to this Full Bench for consideration is :"Whether the State can, in respect of the land though covered at the relevant time under the provisions of the ULC Act, but acquired subsequently...

Sunflag Iron and Steel Company Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 - Sections 3(13), 3(14), 16 and 28; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 - Sections 1, 2, 7, 8, 9, 10, 10(1), 12, 12(1), 13, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 21(4), 23, 24, 25, 30, 30(1) and 30(2); Madhya Pradesh Industrial Relations Act, 1960 - Sections 2(13), 2(14), 51 and 52; Apprentices Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 4 and 18; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act; Government of India Act - Sections 107(2); Constitution of India - Article 254, 254(1) and 254(2)

Reported in : 2009(3)BomCR873

Advocate for Respondent : B.H. Dangre, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2, ;A.M. Gordey, Adv. for Respondent No. 3 and ;D.S. Thakur, Adv. for Respondent No. 4

Sinha D.D., J.1. Rule returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of Shri Manohar and Shri Bhangde, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, Mrs. Dangre, learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2, Shri...

Prakash Namdeorao Kedar and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Maharashtra Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Denotified Tribes (Vimukta Jatis), Nomadic Tribes, Other Backward Classes and Special Backward Category (Regulation of Issuance and Verification) of Caste Certificate Act, 2000 - Sections 6(3)

Reported in : 2003(4)ALLMR409; 2004(3)BomCR417; 2003(4)MhLj233

Advocate for Respondent : A.S. Jaiswal, Adv. For respondent No. 2, ;Bharti Dangre, Asst. Government Pleader, For respondent No. 6 and ;S.W. Deshpande, Adv. For respondent Nos. 7 and 8 in Writ petition No. 77 of 1995, ;Bharti

D.D. Sinha, J. 1. The Hon'ble the Chief Justice referred Writ Petition No. 786 of 2002, Vijay Sukhdeo Naydekar v. State of Maharashtra and three Ors. to the Larger Bench in view of the Order of...

Laxmibai Wd/O Shripat Kumare Vs. Chief Executive Officer and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : FamilyService

Acts : Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 - Rule 116 and 116(6)

Reported in : 2004(4)ALLMR619; 2004(6)BomCR744; 2004(4)MhLj330

Advocate for Respondent : A.P. Thakre and ; L.B. Ghadge, Advs., for respondent Nos. 1 and 2; ; B.H. Dangre, AGP for respondent No. 3

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.1. Heard Shri Kalbande, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Thakre, learned counsel for respondent No. 1 and 2 and Smt. Dangre, learned AGP for respondent 2.2. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith by...