Advanced Search Results
Jagannath Bapu Shirsat Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.
Mumbai
Mar-17-2000
Criminal
Sale of Goods Act; Uttart Pradesh (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 379 and 397(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 457 and 482; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227
2000CriLJ4224
D.V. Tele, A.PP. (for No. 1) and ;K.D. Bade Patil, Adv. (for No. 2)
ORDERB.B. Vagyani, J. 1. Heard Shri R. B. Raghuwanshi, learned counsel for Petitioner; Shri D. V. Tele, learned APP for respondent No. 1 and Shri K. D. Bade Patil, learned counsel for respondent No. 2.2. A...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDnyandeo Pandurang Yadav and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Mar-05-2004
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 311
2004(3)MhLj309
D.V. Tele, Additional Public Prosecutor
Naresh H. Patil, J.1.Heard Shri. R. N. Dhorde, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Shri. D. V. Tele, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent State.2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri Arvind G. Chaudhari Sub-divisional Officer Irrigation, Sub-divisi ...
Mumbai
Jun-24-2008
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 2, 10(1), 25B, 25F and 44; Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 3(5); Maharashtra Employment Guarantee Act, 1977 - Sections 3, 5, 6, 7, 8(7), 11, 11(1) and 16; Employment Exchange Act; Constitution of India - Articles 41 and 227
2008(5)ALLMR89; 2008(5)BomCR106; (2008)110BOMLR2224; [2008(118)FLR850]; (2008)IIILLJ477Bom; 2008(6)MhLj746
V.Y. Patil, Advocate for Respondent No. 1 and ;D.V. Tele, A.G.P. for Respondent No. 2
P.R. Borkar, J.1. By this Writ Petition the original respondents are challenging the order passed by the Judge, Labour Court, Jalgaon in U.L.P. No. 52 of 1995 on 07.10.1998 whereby directions are given to the petitioners...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Bhagabai W/O Ramdas MaraThe and Latabai W/O Pralhad Foke @ MaraThe Vs. ...
Mumbai
Sep-10-2009
ConstitutionProperty
Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1974 - Sections 2(1), 3, 6(2) and 7; Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 - Sections 50B
2009(6)BomCR35
D.V. Tele, A.G.P. for State and ;A.A. Dabir, Adv. for Respondent No. 3.
P.R. Borkar, J.1. This writ petition challenges issuance of notice dated 13.08.1996, issued by the Additional Commissioner, Nashik Division, Nashik, for revision of the order passed by the Dy. Collector, Dhule, in Case No. 298 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGitabai Vs. Anusayabai and Another
Mumbai Aurangabad
Apr-09-2015
Land Acquisition
1. This matter was heard on 08.04.2015. After hearing the learned Advocates for quite sometime, this matter was adjourned to 09.04.2015 at the request of the parties. I have heard the learned Advocates for both the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGazi SaduddIn @ Pappu S/O. Gazi Zaheer and Others Vs. the State of Mah ...
Mumbai Aurangabad
Oct-23-2012
Land Acquisition
1. Heard Adv. Mr. H.F. Pawar, holding for Adv. Mr. A.H. Kapadia, for the appellants, and learned APP Mr. D.V. Tele for the respondent. 2. Challenge in this appeal is to the conviction and sentence imposed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGazi SaduddIn @ Pappu S/O. Gazi Zaheer and Others Vs. the State of Mah ...
Mumbai Aurangabad
Oct-23-2012
Land Acquisition
1. Heard Adv. Mr. H.F. Pawar, holding for Adv. Mr. A.H. Kapadia, for the appellants, and learned APP Mr. D.V. Tele for the respondent. 2. Challenge in this appeal is to the conviction and sentence imposed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDnyaneshwar Murlidhar Kapile Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai Aurangabad
Oct-31-2012
Education
Oral Judgment: Heard learned Adv. Mr. N.S. Ghanekar for the petitioner, and learned APP Mr. D.V. Tele for the respondent. 2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent of learned Counsel for the parties, taken...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTitan Industries Limited and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra and Other ...
Mumbai Aurangabad
Jun-30-2016
Land Acquisition
Oral Judgment: 1. The petitioner has challenged the continuance of the proceedings in Summary Criminal Case No.515 of 2005 pending in the Court of Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Osmanabad. It is stated that the State had...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Ahmednagar Merchants Co-op. Bank Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ...
Mumbai
Apr-21-1999
CriminalContempt of Court
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2 and 15(1); Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 23(2) and 79; Constitution of India - Article 215
2000(5)BomCR133; 2000BomCR(Cri)133
V.D. Sapkal, A.P.P. and ;R.N. Dhore, Adv.
ORDERV.K. Barde, J.1. The petitioner, Ahmednagar Merchants Co-operative Bank Ltd., Ahmednagar (For short, hereinafter referred to as 'Bank'), has filed this contempt petition alleging that the respondent No. 4, Mr. D.S. Naik, acting as District Deputy...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »