Advanced Search Results
Surender Kumar Vs. State
Delhi
Jan-18-2010
Family
Indian Succession Act - Sections 2, 59 and 63; Evidence Act - Sections 65, 67, 68 and 73
166(2010)DLT760
D.R. Singh, Adv. in Probate Case No. 5/1989, ; S.K. Sharma, ;
Aruna Suresh, J.1. Probate case No. 5/1989 has been instituted by Surender Kumar son of Shri Tehl Ram Tuteja (since deceased) seeking probate in respect of Will dated 29.01.1988. Probate Case No. 44/1990 has been filed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJagdish Prasad Vs. Ivth Addl. Sessions Judge and ors.
Allahabad
Feb-13-1995
FamilyCriminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125, 126(2) and 127; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 9
I(1996)DMC496
S.C.
K.L. Sharma, J.1. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India directed against an order dated 13.6.1994 passed by IV Additional Sessions Judge, Varanasi in Criminal Revision No. 286 of 1993...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThanu Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Chhattisgarh
Apr-29-2003
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 147, 149, 302 and 364; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 27 and 32
2003(4)MPHT50(CG)
Ranbir Singh, Govt. Adv.
L.C. Bhadoo, J.1. Both the appeals are being decided by this common judgment as they arise out of the common judgment dated 28-2-2002 passed by the Fourth Additional Sessions Judge, Jagdalpur, Bastar in Sessions Trial No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Deepak Dwarkaprasad Gupta and anr Vs. Ms. Sitaram Enterprises.
Mumbai
Oct-17-2011
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 6 Rule 17; Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1999 - Section 16, 32, 7; Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act 2002 - Section 16, 7
1. Heard Mr. D.R. Singh, Advocate for the Petitioner and Mr. Girish Lodha, partner of the Respondent(Plaintiff) firm. Rule. By consent rule made returnable forthwith and Petition is taken up for hearing on board. 2. Original...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskD R Singh and anr Vs. Smt Deepa Chaudhary and ors
Delhi
Jul-15-2013
Education
Mr. Shiv Charan Garg, Mr. Shashank Mittal, Mr. Sunil Mittal
$~43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:15. 07.2013 + FAO (OS) 315/2013 CM APPL.10502-10504/2013 D R SINGH & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. R.K. Saini, Advocate. versus SMT DEEPA...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri Madan Lal Vs. Late Sh. Bindraban Handa Through His Lrs
Delhi
Sep-12-2000
Property
Constitution of India, Article 227
2001IIAD(Delhi)221; 89(2001)DLT653
ORDERKHAN, (J)1. Petitioner, a 75 year old retired Govt.servant filed Suit No.88/77 for possession of 650 Sq.yards of land under Khasra No.65/1 at Mauja Seelampur, Gandhi Nagar, Delhi. Some defendants had filed the written statement and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSubhash Pandey S/O Shri P.N. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through Its
Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
May-01-2007
Land Acquisition
1. By virtue of this MA applicant seeks permission to prosecute Shri S.N. Das, Chief Soil Survey Officer under Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the appropriate Metropolitan Magistrate, Delhi.3. The applicant, no...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS K Jindal Vs. Union of India and Ors
Delhi
Jul-16-2015
Education
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision : July 16, 2015 + LPA4452015 S K JINDAL Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Sarvesh Bisaria with Mr.Prakash Chand Sharma, Advs. versus UNION...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShyam Biri Works (P.) Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Allahabad
Feb-15-2002
Direct Taxation
(2003)84ITD124(All.)
1. These appeals by the assessee are directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Central), Kanpur (hereinafter referred to as "the CIT(C)" dated 5-1-2001 passed under Section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 setting...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSubhash Kumar JaIn Vs. Asstt. Cit
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chandigarh
May-05-2003
Direct Taxation
(2004)88ITD272(Chd.)
Even if while examining the records of an assessment order in exercise of his powers of revision under section 263, the Commissioner finds that the assessing officer has not initiated penalty proceedings, he cannot direct the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »