Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: d r more · Page 1 of about 24 results (0.274 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 27 2001

Mohamed Aslam and anr. Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-27-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 114, 392 and 397

Reported in : 2001ALLMR(Cri)2258; 2001CriLJ3243

Advocate for Respondent : D.R. More, APP

ORDERA.S. Bagga, J.1. This appeal has been filed by the Appellants (Original) Accused Nos. 1 and 2 against the Judgment and Order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge. Greater Bombay, thereby convicting the appellants for the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 04 2005

Nivrutti Bala Patil Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-04-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302

Reported in : 2005CriLJ199

Advocate for Respondent : D.R. More, APP

R.C. Chavan, J.1. By this appeal, appellant challenges his conviction for the offence punishable under section 302 of the Penal Code and the sentence of imprisonment for life inflicted upon him.2. Appellant and his wife came...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 22 2003

Citizens Forum for Scientific Development of Pimpri-chinchwad Vs. Stat ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-22-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Pimpri-Chinchwad Municipal Corporation (Octroi) Rules, 2001; Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 - Sections 127, 149, 149(3) and 457

Reported in : 2003(2)ALLMR85; 2003(3)BomCR760; 2003(2)MhLj479

Advocate for Respondent : P. Janardhanan, Additional Adv. General and ;V.P. Malvankar, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent No. 1, ;D.R. More, Adv. for respondent Nos. 2 and 3, ;Hitesh Jain, Adv., i/b., ;Udwadia Udeshi

C.K. Thakker, C.J.1. Rule. Mr. P. Janardhanan, Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of rule on behalf of respondent No. 1. Mr. D, R. More, learned counsel, appears and waives service of rule on behalf...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 02 2001

Mangesh Janardhan Mohite (President) and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-02-2001

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 - Sections 16, 41, 42, 76, 95B and 184; Greater Bombay Development Control Regulations, 1991 - Regulation 33(7); Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 44

Reported in : 2002(3)ALLMR660; 2002(5)BomCR653

Advocate for Respondent : Shekhar Naphade, Sr. Adv., i/b., Sameer Tendulkar, Adv. in W.P. No. 1288/2001 and in C. S. No. 171/2001 in W.P. No. 1288/2001, for respondent Nos. 13 to 15, ;P. Janardhanan, A.G. and R.M. Sawant, G.P.

H.L. Gokhale, J.1. These two petitions raise important questions of law with respect to some of the provisions of Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as 'MHAD Act') concerning development of acquired...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 1997

Pandurang Dadu Patil and Another Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Anot ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-06-1997

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 300, 302, 304. 324, 325 and 326; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 8 and 45; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 235, 313, 377 and 378

Reported in : 1998BomCR(Cri)62

ORDERVishnu Sahai, J.1. Since all these matters arise out of the same incident, and a common impugned judgment, we are disposing them off by one judgment.2. Accused Ramhari Hasabe, Pandurang Dadu Patil, Krishnadeo Namdeo Shinde and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 29 1999

Jawahar Lal Oswal Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chandigarh

Decided on : Jan-29-1999

Subject : Direct Taxation

1. All these appeals were heard together as they involved a common issue. They are being disposed of by means of a consolidated order for the sake of convenience.2. Taking up the cross appeals of Shri...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 15 1991

Mahendra R. Mehta Vs. Collector of Customs and Central

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on : Jan-15-1991

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1991)LC724Tri(Chennai)

1. This appeal is directed against the order of the Additional Collector of Customs, Madurai dated 10-9-1989. The appellant imported 3000 kgs. of cloves under Bill of Entry No. 82 dated 13-12-1988 and proceedings were instituted...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 13 1990

Bhanubhai M. Raval Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-13-1990

Subject : Election

Acts : Daman and Diu (Administration) Regulation, 1987; Goa, Daman and Diu Village Panchayats Regulation, 1962 - Sections 11; Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 8 and 30; Govt of Union Territories Act, 1963 - Sections 12 and 14

Reported in : AIR1991Bom91; 1990(2)BomCR22; (1990)92BOMLR167

Advocate for Respondent : R.M. Agarwal and ;D.R. More, Advs.

ORDERSharad Manohar, J.1. Questioninvolved in the Petition and the statement of skeleton facts giving rise to the question: A question of quite some importance is raised in this petition by the petitioner, who is a voter...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 04 2005

Pramila Anand Sing Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-04-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Sections 56 and 56(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 323, 385, 452 and 504

Reported in : 2005(3)MhLj939

Advocate for Respondent : D.R. More, A.P.P.

A.M. Khanwilkar, J.1. Heard Counsel for the parties. This petition takes exception to the order passed by the Principal Secretary (Appeal and Security) dated January 2004 in appeal filed by the Petitioner questioning the justness of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 15 2007

Nivritti Namdeo Thite Vs. Hemraj Gulabchand Daga

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-15-2007

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Rent Act - Sections 12(2), 12(3) and 23; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 2007(4)ALLMR473; 2007(5)BomCR283

Advocate for Respondent : U.B. Nighot, Adv., i/b., ;D.R. More, Adv.

D.B. Bhosale, J. 1. This writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against the judgment and order dated 12.9.1989 rendered by the IV Additional District Judge, Pune in Civil Appeal No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial