Advanced Search Results
Mohamed Aslam and anr. Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Mar-27-2001
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 114, 392 and 397
2001ALLMR(Cri)2258; 2001CriLJ3243
D.R. More, APP
ORDERA.S. Bagga, J.1. This appeal has been filed by the Appellants (Original) Accused Nos. 1 and 2 against the Judgment and Order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge. Greater Bombay, thereby convicting the appellants for the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNivrutti Bala Patil Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Aug-04-2005
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302
2005CriLJ199
D.R. More, APP
R.C. Chavan, J.1. By this appeal, appellant challenges his conviction for the offence punishable under section 302 of the Penal Code and the sentence of imprisonment for life inflicted upon him.2. Appellant and his wife came...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCitizens Forum for Scientific Development of Pimpri-chinchwad Vs. Stat ...
Mumbai
Jan-22-2003
Civil
Pimpri-Chinchwad Municipal Corporation (Octroi) Rules, 2001; Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 - Sections 127, 149, 149(3) and 457
2003(2)ALLMR85; 2003(3)BomCR760; 2003(2)MhLj479
P. Janardhanan, Additional Adv. General and ;V.P. Malvankar, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent No. 1, ;D.R. More, Adv. for respondent Nos. 2 and 3, ;Hitesh Jain, Adv., i/b., ;Udwadia Udeshi
C.K. Thakker, C.J.1. Rule. Mr. P. Janardhanan, Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of rule on behalf of respondent No. 1. Mr. D, R. More, learned counsel, appears and waives service of rule on behalf...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mangesh Janardhan Mohite (President) and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra ...
Mumbai
Nov-02-2001
CivilProperty
Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 - Sections 16, 41, 42, 76, 95B and 184; Greater Bombay Development Control Regulations, 1991 - Regulation 33(7); Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 44
2002(3)ALLMR660; 2002(5)BomCR653
Shekhar Naphade, Sr. Adv., i/b., Sameer Tendulkar, Adv. in W.P. No. 1288/2001 and in C. S. No. 171/2001 in W.P. No. 1288/2001, for respondent Nos. 13 to 15, ;P. Janardhanan, A.G. and R.M. Sawant, G.P.
H.L. Gokhale, J.1. These two petitions raise important questions of law with respect to some of the provisions of Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as 'MHAD Act') concerning development of acquired...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPandurang Dadu Patil and Another Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Anot ...
Mumbai
Mar-06-1997
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 300, 302, 304. 324, 325 and 326; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 8 and 45; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 235, 313, 377 and 378
1998BomCR(Cri)62
ORDERVishnu Sahai, J.1. Since all these matters arise out of the same incident, and a common impugned judgment, we are disposing them off by one judgment.2. Accused Ramhari Hasabe, Pandurang Dadu Patil, Krishnadeo Namdeo Shinde and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJawahar Lal Oswal Vs. Assistant Commissioner of
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chandigarh
Jan-29-1999
Direct Taxation
1. All these appeals were heard together as they involved a common issue. They are being disposed of by means of a consolidated order for the sake of convenience.2. Taking up the cross appeals of Shri...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahendra R. Mehta Vs. Collector of Customs and Central
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Jan-15-1991
Land Acquisition
(1991)LC724Tri(Chennai)
1. This appeal is directed against the order of the Additional Collector of Customs, Madurai dated 10-9-1989. The appellant imported 3000 kgs. of cloves under Bill of Entry No. 82 dated 13-12-1988 and proceedings were instituted...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhanubhai M. Raval Vs. Union of India and Others
Mumbai
Feb-13-1990
Election
Daman and Diu (Administration) Regulation, 1987; Goa, Daman and Diu Village Panchayats Regulation, 1962 - Sections 11; Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 8 and 30; Govt of Union Territories Act, 1963 - Sections 12 and 14
AIR1991Bom91; 1990(2)BomCR22; (1990)92BOMLR167
R.M. Agarwal and ;D.R. More, Advs.
ORDERSharad Manohar, J.1. Questioninvolved in the Petition and the statement of skeleton facts giving rise to the question: A question of quite some importance is raised in this petition by the petitioner, who is a voter...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPramila Anand Sing Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.
Mumbai
Mar-04-2005
Criminal
Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Sections 56 and 56(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 323, 385, 452 and 504
2005(3)MhLj939
D.R. More, A.P.P.
A.M. Khanwilkar, J.1. Heard Counsel for the parties. This petition takes exception to the order passed by the Principal Secretary (Appeal and Security) dated January 2004 in appeal filed by the Petitioner questioning the justness of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNivritti Namdeo Thite Vs. Hemraj Gulabchand Daga
Mumbai
Feb-15-2007
Tenancy
Bombay Rent Act - Sections 12(2), 12(3) and 23; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100; Constitution of India - Article 227
2007(4)ALLMR473; 2007(5)BomCR283
U.B. Nighot, Adv., i/b., ;D.R. More, Adv.
D.B. Bhosale, J. 1. This writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against the judgment and order dated 12.9.1989 rendered by the IV Additional District Judge, Pune in Civil Appeal No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »