Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: d r bhagade · Page 1 of about 3 results (0.028 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 17 1967

Parwati Vs. Janabai

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-17-1967

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Hindu Women's Rights to Property Act, 1937 - Sections 3; Hindu Women's Rights to Property (Amendment) Act, 1938; Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR1969Bom77; (1968)70BOMLR517; ILR1969Bom297; 1968MhLJ441

Advocate for Respondent : D.R. Bhagade, Adv.

Abhyankar, J.1. The following two questions have been referred to Division Bench by the learned Single Bench Judge:(1) Whether the share obtained by a member of a joint Hindu family on partition is and continues to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 09 1958

Manager, Ramkrishna Ramnath Bidi Factory Vs. First Civil J. First Clas ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-09-1958

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Payment of Wages Act, 1936 - Sections 15, 15(3) and 18; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 11, Rules 12, 13, 14, 15, 17 and 18

Reported in : AIR1959Bom181; (1959)61BOMLR39; ILR1959Bom850

Advocate for Respondent : D.R. Bhagade, Adv.

S.P. Kotwal, J. 1. This matter arises out of proceedings taken under the Payment of Wages Act, before the first opponent who is the authority appointed under the payment of Wages Act. 2. Opponent No. 2...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 04 1958

Ganpatlal Mulchandji Joshi Vs. First Civil Judge, Class I, Nagpur and ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-04-1958

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Payment of Wages Act, 1936 - Sections 2; Central Provinces Maternity Benefit Act, 1930 - Sections 3, 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5(1), 5 and 9; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR1958Bom262; (1958)60BOMLR621; ILR1959Bom367

Advocate for Respondent : D.R. Bhagade, Adv.

ORDER1. The petitioner is the manager of a bidi factory at Gondia in the Bhandara district. Respondent No. 2, whom I will hereafter refer to as the respondent, was one of the workers employed in that...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial