Advanced Search Results

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Jaipur Vs. Smt. Poonam Pah ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil Motor Vehicles

Acts : Punjab Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal Rules, 1969 (as adopted by Haryana) - Rules 2 and 20; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 25 - Order 5, Rules 9 to 13 and 15 to 30 - Order 13, Rules 3 to 10 - Order 16, Rules 2 to 21 - Order 17 - Order 21, Rule 1 - Order 33, Rules 1 to 3; Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal Rules, 1964; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 195; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) ; Constitution of India - Article 372; Bihar and Orissa Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1930 - Sections 2 (18); Maharashtra State Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961

Reported in : II(1997)ACC537; 1997ACJ1049; AIR1997SC2951; 1997(2)BLJR1757; [1998]92CompCas42(SC); JT1997(6)SC142; (1997)117PLR528; RLW1997(3)SC411; 1997(4)SCALE505; (1997)6SCC100; [1997]

Advocate for Respondent : D.P. Mukherjee and ; Lalita Kaushik (NP), Advs. for Respondent Nos. 4-6

ORDERG.N. Ray, J. 1. Leave granted. Heard Learned Counsel for the parties.2. The question that calls for the decision of this Court is whether Order XXI Rule 1(2) CPC is applicable in respect of the claims...

Rekha Mukherjee Vs. Ashish Kumar Das and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : TenancyCivil

Acts : Transfer of Property Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 47, Rule 1; Constitution of India - Articles 141 and 227

Reported in : AIR2004SC443; (SCSuppl)2004(1)CHN191; JT2003(10)SC63; 2004(2)MhLj838; (2004)1SCC483

Advocate for Respondent : D.P. Mukherjee, ; C.M. Ghosh and ; Nandini Mukherjee, Ad

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Interpretation of a consent order passed by this Court falls for consideration in this appeal which arises out of a judgment and order dated 11.6.2003 passed by the High Court of...

Manindra Chandra Dey Vs. Cegat

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Customs

Acts : Gold Control Act; ;Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 104, 108 and 135; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 164

Reported in : 1992(58)ELT192(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : D.P. Mukherjee and ;Prantosh Mukherjee, Advs.

Ajoy Nath Roy, J.1. This is an application by Manindra Chandra Dey, the writ petitioner, complaining against an imposition of a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- upon him made by the customs authorities. The imposition was made...

Labanya Prova Mitra Vs. Purnendu Kumar Ghose and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Family

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 63 and 65

Reported in : 2008(1)CHN30

Advocate for Respondent : Sudhis Dasgupta,; D.P. Mukherjee,; Smritikana Mukherjee,; Debjit Mukherjee and; Bibhas Sarkar, Advs.

Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta, J.1. By this appeal the judgment and order dated 20th May, 1994 of the learned Additional District Judge, Second Court, Howrah, granting probate of a Will has been assailed. The application for grant...

Ashok Banik Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Service

Acts : West Bengal Schools (Control of Expenditure) Act, 2005 - Section 14; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Advocate for Respondent : Gautam Wilson, Adv.

Debasish Kar Gupta, J.1. This writ application is filed by the petitioner for a direction upon the respondent authority to give him appointment to the post of Assistant Teacher of Mathematics in the post graduate scale...

Haryana State Warehousing Corporation and anr. Vs. Jagat Ram and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Acts : Housing Corporation Act, 1962 - Section 42; Haryana Warehousing Corporation (Officers & Staff) Regulations, 1994,

J U D G M E N T1. Two Special Leave Petitions have been filed against the judgment and order dated 11th October, 2010, passed by the Division Bench of the Punjab & Haryana High Court...

Jagdish Prasad Sah and ors. Vs. Ram Kumar Agarwala and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : 1983(1)SCALE715; 1984Supp(1)SCC601

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Uma Datta

ORDER1. When the special leave petition came up for admission before the Court on December 14, 1981, the Court rejected the prayer for granting leave against the decree of eviction and gave a direction to issue...

Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Etc. Vs. Shillong City Bus Syndi ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 1; Constitution of India - Article 245; Assam Organisation (Meghalaya) Act, 1969 - Sections 7B; Constitution (Sixth Amendment) Act, 1968

Reported in : 1996IIIAD(SC)321; AIR1996SC1546; [1996(73)FLR1077]; JT1996(3)SC581; (1996)IILLJ753SC; 1996(3)SCALE125; (1996)8SCC741; [1996]3SCR942; (1996)2UPLBEC1401

Advocate for Respondent : N.R. Choudhary, ; D.N. Mukherjee and ; Rajan Mukherjee, Advs

ORDER1. C.A. No. 3140 of 1980.2. This Appeal by certificate granted by the High Court of Gauhati arises from its judgment dated September 19, 1979 in Civil Rule No. 82/73. The respondent-Shillong City Bus Syndicate filed...

K.S.R. Chari Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

Acts : Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Anip Sachthey; Mr. Mohit Paul; Ms. Shagun Matta; Mr. R.V. Sinha; Mr. A.S. Singh, Advs.

1. The Petitioner, who is 91 years old, has approached this Court seeking directions to the Government of India („GoI) in the Ministry of Coal and Mines („MoCM) (Respondent No. 1), Coal India Limited (`CIL) (Respondent...

M/S. Ahuja Builders and ors. Vs. the Board of Trustees for the Port of ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Land Acquisition

ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE WP No.528 of 2012 M/S.AHUJ.BUILDERS & ORS.Versus THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FOR THE PORT OF KOLKATA & ORS.WP No.519 of 2012 RAJESH CHUREWAL...