Advanced Search Results

Commissioner of Income-tax, Bihar Vs. Heckett Engineering Co. (India B ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Super Profits Tax Act, 1963 - Section 2(10)

Reported in : [1984]145ITR510(SC); 1984Supp(1)SCC681

D.P. Madon and; v.D. Tulzapurkar, JJ.1. After hearing counsel for the Revenue as well as for the assessee, we are satisfied that the question raised in this appeal is covered by a decision of this Court...

The Titaghur Paper Mills Company Limited and anr. Vs. State of Orissa ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : 1985(Supp)SCC377

V. D. TULZAPURKAR; A. N. SEN ; D. P. MADON, JJ.1. These two petitions for special leave to appeal are directed against those parts of the judgment of the High Court of Orissa rejecting some of...

Kartar Singh Vs. State of Punjab.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 1994SCC(3)569; JT1994(2)423

JUDGMENT:The Judgments of the Court were delivered by S. RATNAVEL PANDIAN, J. (on behalf of himself, Punchhi, J., K. Ramaswamy, J., Agrawal, J. and Sahai, J.).1.The above batch of matters consisting of a number of writ...

Collector of Bombay Vs. Burjor Hormusji Poonegar and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 80 - Order 6, Rule 17; Bombay City Land Revenue Act, 1876 - Sections 3(2), 3(3), 3(4), 8, 9, 10, 13, 14 and 17; East India Company Act, 1833 - Sections 2 and 39; India Councils Act, 1861 - Sections 36; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 100, 154, 172, 172(1), 172(2), 173 and 174; Government of India Act, 1858 - Sections 39; Foras Act, 1851; Land Acquisition Act, 1857; Conveyance of Land Act, 1854 - Sections 16; Railways Clauses Consolidation Act, 1845 - Sections 3; Adaptation of Laws Order, 1937; Andhra (Madras) General Sales Tax Act, 1939 - Sections 22 - Schedule - Article 286(1); Salsette Estates (Land Revenue Exemption Abolition) Act, 1951 - Sections 3(3); Statute Law

Reported in : AIR1964Bom7; (1963)65BOMLR191; ILR1963Bom715

Advocate for Respondent : S.V. Gupte, D.P. Madon, S.N. Vakil and K.D. Mehta, Advs., i/b., Payne and Co., Attorneys

Shah, J. 1. This is an appeal filed by the Collector of Bombay against the respondents who had filed a suit for the following declarations : (a) that there was a right on their part in...

Navinchandra Ratilal Patel and anr. Vs. Gordhandas Desai Private Ltd a ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 84 and 155; Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 2(10) - Schedule - Article 120 and 181

Reported in : [1967]37CompCas747(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : D.P. Madon, Adv.

ORDERGokhale (Chairman)1. These two petitions have been filed under section 155 of the Companies Act, 1956, which shall hereinafter be referred to as the Act. Petition No. 9 is by one Navinchandra Ratilal Patel for rectification...

Petro Antonio Luciano Sequeira and anr. Vs. Goolbai Nadirshaw and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 58; Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882 - Sections 41

Reported in : AIR1954Bom81; (1953)55BOMLR739; ILR1953Bom1153

Advocate for Respondent : D.P. Madon, ;N.S. Khambata, ;Narielwala and ;Framroze, Advs.

ORDER1. A very interesting question arises in this revision application with regard to the right, of a mortgagee under an English mort-.gage to enforce his right of possession against the mortgagor. It appears that the petitioners...

Martab Ali Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 72, 73, 75, 77 and 140; Indian Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 30, 31 and 48; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 80

Reported in : AIR1954Bom297; (1954)56BOMLR150

Advocate for Respondent : D.P. Madon and ;M.P. Laud, Advs.

1. The plaintiff sues to recover from the defendant a sum of Rs. 80,291-11-0 as compensation for loss occasioned to him by non-delivery of certain bales of cloth, consigned to Gujranwalla station by the plaintiff's agents...

Harshawadan Bandivadekar Vs. Taramati Harishchandra Ghanekar and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 15(2), 19 and 20; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 4 to 24 and 29(2); Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 34 and 43; Constitution of India - Articles 129 and 215; Allahabad High Court Rules - Rule 5

Reported in : 2009(1)BomCR170

Advocate for Respondent : D.P. Madon, Sr. Adv. and ;S.A. Sawant and ;Gunjan Shah, Advs. for respondent Nos. 1, 3, 4 and 6 and ;G.D. Utangale, Adv. for respondent No. 9

Radhakrishnan S., J.1. By this appeal, the appellant is challenging the judgment and order of the learned Single Judge dated 20th April, 2007 in the above notice of motion. The respondents (petitioners in the Contempt petition)...

The State of Bombay Vs. Sista's Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953 - Sections 2(6) and 34; Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1946 - Sections 2 and 11

Reported in : [1957]8STC593(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : M.L. Manekshaw, ;D.P. Madon, Advs. and ;i/b. Divecha & Thakore

Shah, J.1. The Bombay Sales Tax Tribunal have referred to us under section 34 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953, the question 'whether the respondent-company (Messrs. Sista's Ltd.) is a 'dealer' within the meaning of...

Krishnaprasad Jwaladutt Pilani Vs. Colaba Land and Mills Co. Ltd. and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 166, 255 and 256

Reported in : (1959)61BOMLR636

Advocate for Respondent : J.M. Thakore, ;V.J. Pilani, ;D.P. Madon, ;K.J. Pilani, ;A.B. Diwan, ;Jayantilal Patel and ;K.H. Bhabha, Advs., ;F.S. Nariman, Adv. for ;Phiroz Wadia, Adv.;S.K. Desai, Adv. for Director, Solomon Moses

S.T. Desai, J.(1) A question of considerable importance and some interest arises on this application under the new Companies Act of 1956 and the question relates to the tenure of office of what are usually described...