Advanced Search Results

Himachal Pradesh Administration Vs. Mt. Shiv Devi

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 164, 173(4), 367, 417, 423 and 510(2); ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 5, 8, 24 and 27; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300 and 302

Reported in : AIR1959HP3,1959CriLJ448

Advocate for Respondent : D.N. Vaidya, Adv.

ORDER: I allow this appeal and set aside the order dated 29-5-1957 of Shri Om Prakash Sessions Judge, Mandi, acquitting Mt. Shiv Devi, of an offence under Section 302, I. P. C. I convict Mt. Shiv...

Ambaka and anr. Vs. Ajmat and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 9; ;Himachal Pradesh Tenants (Rights and Restoration) Act, 1952 - Section 3; ;Tenancy Law; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1956HP53

Ramabhadran, J.C. 1. Ajmat (respondent 1) filed a suit in the Court of the Senior Sub-Judge, Mandi against Ambka, Ruldu and others seeking a declaration that an order of ejectment passed by the Assistant Collector, against...

Budhu Vs. Nahru and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 35, 101 to 104 and 110; ;Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 142; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 2, Rule 2

Reported in : AIR1956HP50

Advocate for Respondent : D.R. Chaudhary, Adv.

ORDERRamabhadran, J.C.1. These two revision petitions can be disposed of conveniently by means of one judgment, as they involve common points for determination. In the case of Civil Revision No. 53 of 1954, a further point...

Mandi Transport Co. Ltd. Vs. Himachal Pradesh Administration and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 179, 212 and 212(3); ;Companies (Amendment) Act, 1956 - Sections 457 and 512(4); ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17

Advocate for Respondent : D.N. Vaidya, Adv.

ORDER(20) The appeal is allowed to this limited extent that the plaintiffs-appellants will be liable to pay only one half of the costs of the defendants-respondents in the trial Court. In other respects, the appeal is...

Lila Dhar Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Section 5(2); ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Section 403

Reported in : AIR1959HP14,1959CriLJ973

Advocate for Respondent : D.N. Vaidya, Govt. Adv.

ORDER22. The result is: while I maintain the conviction of the appellant of an offence under Section5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, Ireduce the fine from Rs. 400/- to Rs. 100/-, indefault one month's...

Japhu and ors. Vs. Parshottam Ram and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR1953HP84

Advocate for Respondent : K.L. Mehra and; D.N. Vaidya, Advs.

Chowdhry, J.C.1. These two appeals arise out of the same suit. It was a suit by a rever-sioner against a Hindu widow and her alienees for a declaration that the alienation was not binding on the...

Union of India Vs. Dinesh Kumar

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Tenancy Law; Himachal Pradesh Abolition of Big Landed Estates and Land Reforms Act, 1953 - Sections 11, 15, 27, 27(3), 27(4), 27(5) and 83; Himachal Pradesh Abolition of Big Landed Estates and Land Reforms (Amendment) Act, 1954; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 16

Reported in : AIR1968Delhi255; 4(1968)DLT419; ILR1968Delhi32

Advocate for Respondent : B.C. Misra, Senior Adv., ; D.N. Vaidya, ; Hem Chand and

S.K. Kapur, J.1. The following two questions regarding the scope and construction of the Himachal Pradesh Abolition of Big Landed Estates and Land Reforms Act, 1953, have been referred to Full Bench :-'1. Where the annual...

Barikam and anr. Vs. Charnu and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Family

Reported in : AIR1953HP63

Advocate for Respondent : D.N. Vaidya, Adv.

ORDERChowdhry, J.C.(1) This is a defendants' application in revision, and it arises in the following circumstances.(2) Niku, brother of the plaintiffs-respondents Lachmu and Charnu, died on 15-9-1993 B. He left property in two villages, Bodhal and...

Devi Singh Vs. Bhagat and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Court-fees Act, 1870 - Schedule - Articles 11 and 13; ;Himachal Pradesh (Courts) Order, 1948; ;Court-fees (Himachal Pradesh Amendment) Act, 1953

Reported in : AIR1954HP41

Advocate for Respondent : D.N. Vaidya, Govt. Adv.

ORDERChowdhry, J.C.1. This was a suit by three persons, Bhagat, Suresh and Boota for recovery of Rs. 4761/- on a bond against Devi Singh, Sant and Puran Chand. The trial Court decreed the suit against Devi...

Lal Singh Vs. the State

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Section 372

Reported in : AIR1954HP43

Advocate for Respondent : D.N. Vaidya, Govt. Adv.

Chowdhry, J.C. 1. This is an application in revision by Lal Singh against the order of the learned District Magistrate of Mandi, dated 29-7-1953, directing further enquiry against the petitioner. 2. It appears that the present...