Advanced Search Results

Baba @ Gulam Raza HussaIn Hadi Tapti Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302 and 304; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 45 and 59; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 154, 161, 165 and 235

Reported in : 1999BomCR(Cri)890; 1999CriLJ4618; 2000(1)MhLj164

Advocate for Respondent : D.N. Salvi, A.P.P.

ORDERVishnu Sahai, J.1. Through this appeal, the appellant challenges the Judgment and Order dated 4-2-1995 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune in Sessions Case No. 505 of 1993, convicting and sentencing him to undergo 10...

Prabhavati Nivrutti Patil (Sou.) Vs. Nivrutti Kashinath Patil (Shri) a ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) 1973 - Sections 125(1)

Reported in : 2001(5)BomCR221; 2001CriLJ1989; II(2001)DMC152

Advocate for Respondent : D.N. Salvi, A.P.P.

Pratibha Upasani, J.1. This Criminal Revision Application is filed by the petitioner/wife, being aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 9th June, 1994, passed by the Sessions Judge, Raigad, Alibag, in Criminal Revision Application No. 142...

Adarsh Co-operative Housing Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

AJN 00-CRI-WP570.11 :1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.570 OF 2011 Adarsh Co-operative Housing ) Society Limited, a Society ) registered under the Maharashtra ) Co-operative Societies...

Amogshidh Annappa Shendge and Another Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 299, 302 and 304; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 8, 9, 45, 58 and 61; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 154, 161, 165, 235 and 378; Bombay Police Act - Sections 135

Reported in : 2000(5)BomCR163; 2000BomCR(Cri)163

Advocate for Respondent : S.N. Salvi, A.P.P. and ;S.G. Kudle, Adv.

ORDERVishnu Sahai, J.1. Through this Criminal Appeal the appellants challenge the Judgment and Order dated 4-5-1995 passed by the IVth AdditionalSessions Judge, Solapur, in Sessions Case No. 239 of 1994, convicting and sentencing them to undergo...

Henmant Hariba Sonwalkar Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1999)101BOMLR308

Vishnu Sahai, J.1. Since both these appeals arise out of the same set of facts and a common impugned Judgment we are disposing them off by one Judgment.2. Nine persons namely (1) Hanmant Hariba Sonwalkar (2)...

Rajani Vishwas Patil Vs. the Central Bureau of Investigation and Anoth ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. D.N.Salvi

Oral Order: 1. Heard Mr. V.D.Sapkal, the learned counsel for the applicant. Heard Mr. D.N.Salvi the learned counsel for respondent no.1-CBI. None appears for the respondent no.2, when called out. 2. The applicant is the widow...

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Roche Products Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1999)155CTR(Bom)185

S.H. KAPAM, J.:The respondent- company purchased the property in question situate at Plot No. 18 of 'Gamadia Estate' admeasuring 2,820.40 sq. yds. with buildings standing thereon situate at 24/26, Pt. Madan Mohan Malviya Road, Bombay. This...

Raichand C. JaIn Vs. Surendra Prasad

Court : Mumbai

Subject : FERA

Acts : Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 8(1), 8(2), 9(1), 13, 18, 18A, 18(1), 18(3), 19(1), 44(2), 50, 51, 56, 56(1), 57, 58, 68, 71, 271(1), 273A, 276C, 277 and 279; Customs Act; Income Tax Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B and 420; Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Tribunal Rules - Rules 2(2)

Reported in : 2006BomCR(Cri)109

Advocate for Respondent : D.N. Salvi, Adv. for Respondent No. 1 and ;S.S. Pednekar, APP

S.C. Dharmadhikari, J.1. Rule. Returnable forthwith. Shri Salvi appearing for respondent No. 1 waives notice. By consent heard finally.2. In these applications the questions arising for consideration are common, arguments are identical and therefore, they can...

Janardan Ramchandra KuThe Vs. Sub-divisional Magistrate and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Bombay Police Act, 1958 - Sections 55, 56 and 58

Reported in : 2001(5)BomCR55

Advocate for Respondent : D.N. Salvi, A.P.P.

Pratibha Upasani, J.1. This Criminal Writ Petition is filed by the petitioner, being aggrieved by the order of externment, being externment proposal No. 8/92 dated 26th March, 1994 passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sub-Division, Alibaug. The...

Shri Purushottam Mishrilal Bhutara and ors. Vs. Jugalkishore R. Kothar ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 190, 205 and 249; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 36, 403, 406 and 420

Reported in : (2001)1BOMLR126

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. D.N. Salvi, A.P.P.

Dr. Pratibha Upasani, J.1. These three Criminal Writ Petitions involve a common question of law, and can be therefore disposed of by this common Judgment and order.2. The Petitioners in all these three Petitions are the...