Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: d n rampal · Page 1 of about 30 results (0.091 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 01 1978

Gian Singh Chhabra Vs. the Sales Tax Tribunal and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-01-1978

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1978]42STC241(P& H)

Advocate for Respondent : D.N. Rampal, D.A.G.

Rajendra Nath Mittal, J.1. Briefly the facts of the case are that the petitioner is a registered dealer and deals in vegetable ghee. It submitted Its return for the assessment year 1966-67 in which it claimed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 05 1974

Dev Datt Shastri Vs. the State

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-05-1974

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1974]34STC96(P& H)

Advocate for Respondent : D.N. Rampal, Assistant Adv.-General

D.K. Mahajan , J. 1. This order will dispose of General Sales Tax References Nos. 2 and 3 of 1973. The assessee is Messrs. Dev Datt Shastri, Jullundur, in both the references. They have arisen in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 15 1975

Malwa Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. the Assessing Authority (Excise and Tax ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-15-1975

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1976]38STC39(P& H)

Advocate for Respondent : D.N. Rampal, Deputy Adv.-General

Ajit Singh Bains, J.1. The petitioner-company is registered under the Companies Act, 1956, and its registered office is at Dhuri. It is doing the business of manufacturing sugar at Dhuri, District Sangrur. The petitioner-company purchased sugarcane...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 15 1975

Malwa Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. the Assessing Authority (Excise and Tax ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-15-1975

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1976)5CTR(P& H)261

Ajit Singh Bains, J. - The petitioner-company is registered under the Companies Act, 1956, and its registered office is at Dhuri. It is doing the business of manufacturing sugar at Dhuri, District Sangrur. The petitioner company...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 02 2004

Devinder Singh Puri Vs. Mr. B.N. Rampal

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-02-2004

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 - Sections 13(2)

Reported in : (2004)138PLR591

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Chopra, Sr. Adv. and; N.D. Kalra, Adv.

M.M. Kumar, J.1. This petition presents a piquant situation in as much as the tenant-petitioner who has insisted on appearing in person has not only miss-used the process of the Court but has refused to assist...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 02 1979

Laxmi Ginning and Oil Mills and anr. Vs. the State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-02-1979

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1980]46STC123(P& H)

Advocate for Respondent : D.N. Rampal, Adv.

I.S. Tiwana, J.1. In order to appreciate the contention raised in this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the following facts need to be stated :The petitioner-firm is a registered dealer under the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 02 1976

Dalip Singh and ors. Vs. the State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-02-1976

Subject : Civil

Acts : Punjab Municipal Act, 1911 - Sections 188 and 197

Reported in : AIR1977P& H109

Advocate for Respondent : D.N. Rampal, Asst. Adv. General (Punjab) and; Harinder Singh, Adv.

R.S. Narula, C.J.1. The circumstances in which the question of interpretation and true scope of the expression 'regulation' in Section 188 (e) (ii) of the Punjab Municipal Act (3 of 1911) (hereinafter called the Act) has...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 21 1969

Satya Devi Vs. the State

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-21-1969

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 465

Reported in : AIR1969P& H387; 1969CriLJ1424

Advocate for Respondent : D.N. Rampal, Assistant Adv.-General

A.D. Koshal, J.1. This appeal is an appeal by Shrimati Satya Devi, aged 40 years, wife of ram Partap and a resident of village Gurditpura in Police Station Sadar Nabha, against the judgment dated the 22nd...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 22 1978

Bhim SaIn Sudarshan Kumar Vs. the State

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-22-1978

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1979]43STC58(P& H)

Advocate for Respondent : D.N. Rampal, Adv. for the;Adv.-General

R.N. Mittal, J.1. This order will dispose of G. S. T. References Nos. 17 to 22 of 1973 as the facts of all the cases and the points involved in them are the same.2. The facts...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 03 1974

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-03-1974

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1974]34STC394(P& H)

Advocate for Respondent : D.N. Rampal, Assistant Adv.-General

ORDERD.K. Mahajan, J. 1. This order will dispose of General Sales Tax References Nos. 21 to 28 of 1972. In all these references, the following two questions of law have been referred by the Tribunal for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial