Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: d n kukdey · Page 1 of about 11 results (0.041 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 26 1994

Christian Community Welfare Council of India and Another Vs. Governmen ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-26-1994

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 21; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302, 304, 323, 330, 335, 342 and 354; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 41, 46, 47, 50, 51, 54, 56, 57, 151, 164, 167, 174 and 439

Reported in : 1996ACJ199; 1996(1)BomCR70; 1995CriLJ4223; 1994(2)MhLj1769

Advocate for Respondent : D.N. Kukdey, A.G.P.

R.M. Lodha, J.1. Police lock-up or death trap Police lawlessness or rule of law Police muscle or personal modesty Police harassment or human rights Yet again a case of custodial death has given rise to myriad...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 01 1989

J.E. Bilmoria and Sons Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-01-1989

Subject : Excise

Acts : Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 58A, 105 and 106(1); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 10; Maharashtra Foreign Liquor (Import and Export) Rules, 1968 - Rule 20

Reported in : 1990(2)BomCR108

Advocate for Respondent : D.N. Kukdey, A.G.P., in W.Ps. 1168, 1170, 1172, 1174, 1176 and 678, ;M.A. Garud, A.G.P., in W.P. 1167, 1169, 1171, 1173, 1175, 1296, 665, 972 and 973 and ;K.R. Gohokar, A.G.P., in W.P. 970 and 971

M.S. Deshpande, J.1. It would be convenient to take up together for consideration these seventeen petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution, the challenge in all being to the authority of the respondents to recover excise...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 22 2007

Mr. Kishorilal S/O Fulchand Baraskar Vs. State of Maharashtra Through ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-22-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 304 and 313; Evidence Act - Sections 27; Identification of Prisoners Act - Sections 4 and 5

Reported in : (2007)109BOMLR2363

Advocate for Respondent : T.A. Mirza, Additional Public Prosecutor

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.1. The appellant has challenged the judgment dated 19.01.2002 delivered by the Additional Sessions Judge, Achalpur in Sessions Trial No. 25/2001, holding him guilty of offence punishable under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 24 1994

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Gangavarapur Padmawati and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-24-1994

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 1996ACJ45

M.B. Ghodeswar and R.M. Lodha, JJ.1. Taking exception to the award passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Yavatmal, on 9.12.1993 in Motor Accident Claim No. 4 of 1990, Gangavarapur Padmawati v. J. Ramchandra Reddy, whereby...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 09 2014

Maharashtra Small Scale Industries Development Corporation Vs. Saurabh ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Dec-09-2014

Subject : Education

Oral Judgment:1. Heard Shri D.N. Kukday, the learned Advocate for the petitioner and Dr. Anjan De, the learned Advocate for the respondent No.1. The respondent No.2 is appellate authority, appearance on its behalf is waived.2. Rule....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 07 1999

Akhtar HussaIn Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-07-1999

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Essential Commodities Act - Sections 3 and 7; Contempt of Courts Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 432 and 433; Maharashtra Prisons (Admission, Classification and Separation of Prisoners) Rules, 1966 - Rule 19; Maharashtra Prisons (Remission System) Rules, 1962; Kerosene Restriction Order, 1966; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21 and 161; kerosene Restriction Order, 1966

Reported in : 1999CriLJ4754

Advocate for Respondent : D.N. Kukdey, Govt. Pleader

J.N. Patel, J.1. Rule.2. By this petition, the petitioner seeks an order to quash and set aside the rejection of his application by the respondent-State to commute his sentence with further directions to the respondent No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 12 1993

Bhujangrao Anandrao Deshmukh and anr. Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-12-1993

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 201 and 302

Reported in : I(1993)DMC193

Advocate for Respondent : D.N. Kukdey, Assistant Government Pleader

A A. Desai, J.1. The appeal by the State is directed against the finding of acquittal for the offence punishable Under Sections 302, 201 and 304B read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code whereas...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 13 1996

Ku. Priyanka Kamlesh Shukla Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-13-1996

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Admission to Medical Courses Rules - Rules 4.1.1, 7.0.1, 8.0.4.1, 8.2.1.1, 8.4.6 and 8.4.5

Reported in : 1996(5)BomCR556

Advocate for Respondent : D.N. Kukdey, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3, ;Qazair Jamali, Adv. for Respondent No. 4, ;S.A. Bobde and ;N.W. Sambre, Advs. for Respondent No. 5, ;B.R. Gavai, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 6 to 9 and ;S

R.K. Batta, J.1. The petitioner passed XIIth Standard examination from Maharashtra State Board of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education, Nagpur Divisional Board in March 1993, securing 422 marks out of 600 marks. She had obtained 218...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 23 1989

J.R. Jugele, Rly. Contractor Vs. Smt. Sitabai Atamaram and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-23-1989

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10(2); Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970

Reported in : 1989(3)BomCR163; [1989(59)FLR628]; (1991)ILLJ233Bom

Advocate for Respondent : D.N. Kukdey, Asstt. Govt. Pleader

Ghodeswar. J.1. The petitioner has challenged the award of Labour Court dated 30th July 1979 on various grounds.2. The petitioner was a Railway Contractor and He had taken contract of loading and unloading of coal and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 15 2004

Vasant S/O Jairam Badodekar Vs. Prakash S/O Bhiku Warhade and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-15-2004

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110A

Reported in : 2005(2)MhLj321

Advocate for Respondent : N.S. Bade, Adv. for respondent No. 1 and ;D.N. Kukdey, Adv. for respondent No. 2

Anoop V. Mohta, J.1. Heard. The present appeal has been preferred by the original appellant, thereby, challenged the judgment dated 24-4-1986, passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Buldhana in Claim Petition No. 16/1984, whereby, the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial