Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: d murugesan · Page 1 of about 512 results (0.040 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 08 2010

M/S.Creative Infrastructure, Vs. the Government of Puducherry, and ors ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-08-2010

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution Of India - Article 226

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.D.Murugesan, Adv.

1. The petitioner in all the three writ petitions is a firm of partnership represented by its Partner styling itself as "Creative Infrastructure".2.In the first writ petition, i.e. W.P.No.6881 of 2009, the prayer of the petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 27 1995

V. Sheemathangam, (Minor) Rep. by Her Grandmother and Guardian G. Than ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-27-1995

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1996(2)CTC54

Advocate for Respondent : D. Murugesan, Special Government Pleader

ORDERShivaraj Patil, J.1. Heard the learned senior counsel for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader for respondents 1 to 3.2. The petitioner in this writ petition has sought for a writ of mandamus directing...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 19 1999

A. Selvaraj Vs. State of Tamil Nadu Through Its Secretary, Adi-dravida ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-19-1999

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Consititution of India -- Article 226

Reported in : 1999(3)CTC441

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. D. Murugesan, Government Pleader Adv.

ORDERJudgment pronounced by A.C. Agarwal, CJ. 1. Admit. Mr.D. Murugesan, Government Pleader takes notice on behalf of respondents 1 and 2. On application made on behalf of the appellant, Respondent No.3 is deleted. By consent the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 09 1996

V. Sheemathangam (Minor) Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Others

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-09-1996

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15 and 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 1, Rule 8

Reported in : AIR1997Mad156

Advocate for Respondent : D. Murugesan, Special Govt. Pleader

ORDER1. This application is filed seeking review of the order dated 27-11-1995 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 11022 of 1995 only on the ground that this Court followed the Division Bench Judgment of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 06 1997

M. Krishnan and 44 Others Vs. the District Collector, Erode District, ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-06-1997

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Stamp Act, 1899 -- Sections 27, 47-A (1) (2) (3), 48, 64; Tamil Nadu Stamp (Prevention of Undervaluation) Rules, 1968, Rule 3; Constitution of India -- Article 14; Registration Act, 1908 -- Sections 61(2)

Reported in : 1998(3)CTC366

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. D. Murugesan,;S.G.P. Mrs. T. Kokilavani G.A. Adv.

ORDER1. This Court ordered notice of motion to the respondents and the respondents have also filed a counter, besides produced the documents. 2. Common arguments were addressed by the learned counsel for petitioners as well as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 24 1989

B. Rajappa Vs. the Addl. Controller of Examination, University of Madr ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-24-1989

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1989Mad242

Advocate for Respondent : D. Murugesan, Adv.

Nainar Sundaram, J. 1. The petitioner in W. P. No. 3572 of 1980 is the appellant in this writ appeal The respondents in the writ petition are the respondents herein. The parties shall be referred to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 26 2012

M.Palanimuthu Vs. the Chief Election Commissioner.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-26-2012

Subject : Education

Acts : Tamil Nadu Patta Passbook Act - Section 3, 4, 6, 14; Specific Relief Act, 1963. - Chapter 4

PrayerPetition under Article 226 of The Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to provide reservation allotment and announcement of reserved constituencies for women SCs & STs in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 05 2006

White Horse Communication Network Rep. by Its Managing Partner R. Raje ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-05-2006

Subject : Commercial

Acts : The Chennai City Municipal Corporation Act, 1919 - Sections 4(3), 9, 203, 204, 205, 214(A), 220, 223A, 223(5) and 285; Tamil Nadu Open Places (Prevention of Disfigurement) Act, 1959 - Sections 129A to 129F

Reported in : (2006)4MLJ1297

Advocate for Respondent : P. Ranganatha Reddy, Adv. ; for King and ; Partridge, Advs.

ORDERD. Murugesan. J. 1. The issue raised in all these writ petitions and writ appeals are common for the disposal of both the writ petitions and writ appeals. We refer the averments made in the writ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 2006

Tamil Nadu Housing Board Phase-5 Residents' Welfare Association rep. b ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-11-2006

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 3, 4, 5A, 6, 9(3), 11, 16, 18, 18(1), 19, 20, 21 and 50; Tamil Nadu Housing Board Act - Sections 72; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 1, Rule 10 and 10(2)

Reported in : (2006)4MLJ558

Advocate for Respondent : R. Subramanian, Sr. Counsel for ;S. Hemalatha, Adv. for R3, R5 to R8

ORDERD. Murugesan, J.1. The following important question has arisen for consideration in this civil revision petition.Whether an allottee of a plot by the Tamil Nadu Housing Board is a 'person interested' and consequently is entitled to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 29 2006

Mr. B. Raman, Vs. Shasun Chemicals and Drugs Ltd., Rep. by Its Company ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-29-2006

Subject : BankingCriminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 7, 138, 141 and 142; Constitution of India - Article 21; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973

Reported in : II(2007)BC499; 2006CriLJ4552; 2007(1)KLT106

Advocate for Respondent : K. Ravi Anantha Padmanabhan, Adv. and ;E. Raja, Amicus Curiae

ORDERM. Karpagavinayagam, J.1. The question posed before this Division Bench is as follows : In the absence of individual notice under Section 138(b) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, to be served on the director of a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial