Advanced Search Results
Matlapudi Sambaiah Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Rep. by the Asst. General ...
Andhra Pradesh
Aug-01-1997
Civil
Indian Telephone Rules, - Rules 2PP and 421
1997(5)ALT281
D. Krishna Murthy, SC for Central Govt.
ORDERB.S.A. Swamy, J.1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. M. Radhakrishna.2. In this writ petition this Court is called upon to decide whether an allottee of a STD booth under a scheme promulgated by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskV.V. Rama Rao Vs. Union of India and Others
Andhra Pradesh
Dec-23-1996
Civil
Telegraph Act, 1985 - Sections 7; Telegraph Rules, 1951 - Rules 2 and 443
AIR1997AP344
D. Krishna Murthy, Addl. Standing Counsel for Central Govt.
ORDER1. Heard Sri V.V.N. Narasimham, learned counsel for the opetitioner and Sri D. Krishna Murthy, learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the Central Government on behalf of the Respondents.2. The petitioner is a Proprietor of a Small...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPrakash Rao and anr. Vs. Appellate Authority Under Payment of Gratuity ...
Andhra Pradesh
Mar-04-2008
Service
Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Sections 7(7); Andhra Pradesh Shops and Establishments Act, 1988 - Sections 48(3); Workmen's Compensation Act - Sections 30
2008(3)ALD521; 2008(3)ALT519; [2008(118)FLR156]; (2008)IIILLJ460AP
G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 4,; C.N. Murthy, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 in W.P. 16035/2007 and; D. Krishna Murthy, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 in W.P. No. 24329/2007
ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. In these two Writ Petitions, similar questions fall for consideration, though one arises out of an appeal preferred under the provisions of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 (for short 'the Gratuity...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Parke-davis Employees Union, Rep. by Its General Secretary, K. Bucha R ...
Andhra Pradesh
Sep-30-2008
Property
Special Economic Zones Act, 2005 - Sections 3(2) to (4), 3(8), 3(10) and 4(1); Central Act
2009(2)ALT290
K.V. Simhadri, S.C. for APII for Respondent No. 1 in W.P. No. 18646 of 2006 and Respondent No. 2 in W.P. No. 4649 of 2007,; P. Venugopal, Sr. Counsel,; D. Krishna Murthy, Adv. for Respondent No. 4 in
ORDERNooty Ramamohana Rao, J.1. Writ Petition No.4649 of 2007 has been instituted by 70 employees of the erstwhile M/s Parke-Davis (India) Limited, a pharmaceutical company, which was taken over by M/s Pfizer Limited, yet another multinational...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHyderabad Beverages Private Limited Etc. Vs. State of A.P.
Andhra Pradesh
Apr-18-2006
Criminal
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2, 2(1), 6(2), 7, 7(1), 7(11), 8, 9A, 10(1), 11, 11(1), 12, 13, 13(1), 13(2A), 13(2B), 13(D), 13(2E), 13(2), 13(3), 13(5), 13(11), 15, 16, 16(1), 21(3) and 114; Seeds Act, 1966 - Sections 7, 19, 16(2), 14(1) and 15(2); Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 21(1), 22, 22(5), 22(6), 24, 24(3), 24(4) and 30(1); Evidence Act - Sections 114; Insecticides (Amendment) Act, 2000; Central Insecticides Laboratory - Sections 24, 24(3) and 24(4); Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 4, 15(3), 15(4), 25, 25(3) and 25(4); Drugs and Cosmetics (Amendment) Act, 1964 - Sections 26, 33B and 33O; Drugs and Cosmetics (Amendment) Act, 1982 - Sections 2 and 18A; Madras City Tenants Protection Act, 1921; Tenants Act - Sections 3 and 9; Indian Penal Co
2006CriLJ3988
Public Prosecutor
ORDERRamesh Ranganathan, J.1. Common questions arise for consideration in Criminal Petition Nos. 4325 of 2003, 3701 of 2004, 3856 of 2005, and 1007 of 2003, as to whether delay, in furnishing a copy of the analyst...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK. NooruddIn and ors. Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by Its Sec ...
Andhra Pradesh
Oct-06-2009
Property
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 3(5), 4, 4(1), 5A, 6, 6(A), 40 and 41, ;Companies Act, 1956; Delhi Development Act, 1957; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 162, 226 and 300
2009(6)ALT146
G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1, 3 and 4 and ;P. Roy Reddy, Adv. for Respondent No. 2
ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. These three writ petitions are being disposed of by a common order in view of the commonality of the factual matrix of these cases and also the commonality of the questions of law...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMukesh Kumar Mittal Vs. The State of Telangana Rep. by Asst. Dir
Andhra Pradesh
Jun-03-2015
Education
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO Criminal Petition No.88 of 2015 03-06-2015 Mukesh Kumar Mittal....Petitioner The State of Telangana Rep. by Asst. Director of Agriculture (Regular) Mallial Division & Agricultural Officer Kodimial Mandal & Seed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskV. Rama Krishna Reddy Vs. Commissioner Narasaraopet Municipality, Nara ...
Andhra Pradesh
Jul-02-2002
Civil
Constitution of India - Article 226
2002(4)ALD892
E.S.S. Pratap SC for Responsent Nos. 1 and 2 and ;Government Pleader for Respondent Nos. 3 and 6
Ar. Lakshmanan, C.J. 1. Heart Shri D. Krishna Murthy, learned Counsel for the petitioner.2. The writ petition is filed seeking a writ of certiorari to call for the records in OS No. 2 of 2002 on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKalakoti Siva Reddy and 9 Others. Vs. the District Collector,
Andhra Pradesh
Sep-21-2010
Land Acquisition
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4(1), 5-A(2), 6, 9(1)(3), 10, 55(1); A.P. Urban Areas (Development) Act, 1975 - Sections 12, 13(1)(4)(5)(7), 18, 57(3); Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976; A.P. Agricultural Lands (Conversion into Non- Agricultural Purposes) Act, 2006 - Section 3; Punjab Regional and Town Planning and Development Act, 1995 - Sections 31, 42
1. The petitioners, 10 in number, claim title and possession in respect of different extents of lands situated in Sy.Nos.300/1, 300/3, 318/11, 322/1, 641/2B, 679/4A, 679/4B, 684/2, 684/4, 684/5B, 711/1B and 711/3B of Nunna Village, Vijayawada...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPost Master, Keshavgiri and Others Vs. Cor. S.P. Illangovan
Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Mar-09-1995
Land Acquisition
A. Venkatarami Reddy, President: 1. Aggrieved by the order of the District Forum, Hyderabad in C.D. 799/94, whereby it directed the opposite parties i.e; (1) Postmaster, Keshavgiri Post Officer, Hydera bad (2) Sr. Superintendent of Posts...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »