Advanced Search Results

State of M.P. Vs. Ramkumar

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 378; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8, 20 and 50; Arms Act - Sections 25

Reported in : 2000(4)MPHT189

Advocate for Respondent : D.K. Saxena, Adv. and ;Sonali Gupta, Amicus-curiae

Fakhruddin, J.1. The State has preferred this appeal under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code, against the judgment dated 30-6-1995, passed in Sessions Trial No. 459/94, by sixth Additional Sessions Judge, Ujjain against acquittal of...

Jagdish Prasad SaxenA. Vs. Smt. Narayani Devi.

Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (C.P.C.) 1908 - Orders 43, 41 Rules 27, 23A ;

Advocate for Respondent : Shri A. Usmani, Adv.

1. The appellant has preferred this Misc. Appeal being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 8.9.1997 passed by the VII Additional Judge to the Court of District Judge, Bhopal in Civil Appeal No. 77-A/1997 thereby...

Bal Sakha Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Civil

Reported in : [2008(1)JCR333(Jhr)]

ORDER1. Today an additional report has been filed by the learned Advocate General on the basis of the report, submitted by the Members of the Committee. First report has already been filed before this Court giving...

Rajender Kumar Dixit Vs. Management of Hindustan Times Ltd

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

$~22 & 23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2537/2010 Decided on 27th November, 2013 RAJENDER KUMAR DIXIT ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Manish Sharma, Adv. along with petitioner in person....

T. Ranga Reddy Vs. Joint Project Co-ordinator, Non-ferrous Material Te ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 15, 19(2), 26, 226 and 311; Central Excise Act, 1944; Societies Registration Act, 1860; Public Societies Registration Act, 1350; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 25-F; Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act; Andhra Pradesh Shops and Establishments Act - Sections 47

Reported in : 1999(3)ALD173; 1999(3)ALT51

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. K. Srinivasa Murthy, Adv.

ORDER1. In WP No. 16587 of 1994, the order dated 6-6-1994 terminating the services of the petitioner as Deputy Director of Non-Ferrous Materials Technology Development Centre ('NFTDC' for short) is under challenge. The other three writ...

B. Pandurangarao Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Rep. by Its Secretary to Go ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law

Reported in : 1997(4)ALT473

Advocate for Respondent : P. Bhaskara Mohan, Additional Central Govt. Standing Counsel for Respondent No. 1 and ;C.V. Rajeeva Reddy, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3

ORDERT.N.C. Rangarajan, J.1. This writ petition seeks regularisation of the services of the petitioner and for that purpose, a direction to the Department of Space to convey approval to the proposals made by the National Remote...

Raju Mahato Vs. Birsa Agricultural University and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Rajendra Agricultural University Act, 1971; Bihar Agricultural University Act, 1988 - Sections 22, 22(12) and 22(13); Birsa Agricultural University Act, 1981; Jharkhand Agricultural University Act, 2000 - Sections 19(7), 22, 22(10), 36 and 44(2); Birsa Agricultural University Act, 1976; Bihar Agricultural University Second Ordinance, 1987; Jharkhand State University Act, 2000; Bihar Agricultural University Ordinance, 1986; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16

Reported in : [2005(2)JCR568(Jhr)]

Advocate for Respondent : Ram Balak Mahto, Sr. Adv.,; A.K. Sahani, Adv.,; Anil Kum

ORDERNarendra Nath Tiwari, J.1. Complaining public injury caused by the alleged illegal appointments made by the respondent-Birsa Agricultural University, the petitioner has sought for the following reliefs in this writ application in the name of public...

Ajit Raizada And Others Vs. State Of U.P. Thru' Secy. And Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14, 309, 162, 226; U.P. Absorption of Retrenched Employees of the State Government or Public Corporation in Government Service Rules, 1991 ; U.P. Retrenched Employees Rules, 1967 - Rule-2(b), 3

Advocate for Respondent : C.S.C.; Gopal Chand Saxena, Advs

1. Heard Sri S.F.A. Naqvi, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for respondents no. 1, 3 and 4 and Sri Gopal Chandra Saxena, Advocate for respondent no. 2. 2. The petitioners have sought the...

D.M. Chaubey Vs. Union of India (Through) the Secretary, Ministry of U ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Education

Dr. Veena Chhotray, J. 1. The Applicant, working as a Chief Engineer (Electrical) under the CPWD, is aggrieved at denial of promotion to him from the date it was accorded to his juniors. Though granted non-functional...

Ravi Gulati & Anr vs.today Homes & Infrastructure Pvt Ltd &amp ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:13. 10.2017 Judgment delivered on:23. 08.2018 + W.P.(CRL) 1645/2013 and CRL.M.A. 2775/2014 & 19472/2014 ARUN SAXENA & ANR. ........ Petitioners versus TODAY...