Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: d k bhattacharyya · Page 1 of about 15 results (0.093 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 08 2000

Mustt Sahida Khatun and ors. Vs. Secretary, Tezpur Hindustani Muslim P ...

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Jun-08-2000

Subject : ConstitutionProperty

Acts : Societies Registration Act, 1860

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. D.K. Bhattacharyya, Mr. C. Khetri, Mr. M.H. Rajbarbhuyan, Ms. S. Bayan, Mr. B.M. Chouhdury, Mr. R. Goswami, Mr. S. Ali and Mr. I. Hussain, Advs.

1. Earlier a Commission was appointed by this Court to sort out the matter. The Commissioner has submitted a report and there he has stated that the present appellants are not wiling to compromise the matter...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 08 2000

Mustt Sahida Khatun and ors. Vs. Secretary, Tezpur Hindustani Muslim P ...

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Jun-08-2000

Subject : ConstitutionProperty

Acts : Societies Registration Act, 1860

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. D.K. Bhattacharyya, ;Mr. C. Khetri, ;Mr. M.H. Rajbarbhuyan, ;Ms. S. Bayan, ;Mr. B.M. Chouhdury, ;Mr. R. Goswami, ;Mr. S. Ali and ;Mr. I. Hussain, Advs.

1. Earlier a Commission was appointed by this Court to sort out the matter. The Commissioner has submitted a report and there he has stated that the present appellants are not wiling to compromise the matter...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 25 1999

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Raj Brothers

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Nov-25-1999

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 24, 39 and 39(4); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115

Advocate for Respondent : D.K. Bhattacharyya and B.M. Choudhury, Advs.

A.P. Singh, J. 1. The present appeal under Section 39 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 has been filed for challenging the judgment and order dated 16-11-92 passed by Shri K. K. Nag, Assistant District Judge, Sonitpur,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 27 1991

Dr. (Miss) E. Sharma Vs. the State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Aug-27-1991

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Advocate for Respondent : D.K. Bhattacharyya, Govt. Adv., S. Ali, D.K. Das and B.M. Choudhury, Advs.

Srivastava, J. 1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, stated to be in public interest, seeks, seizure of all Books of accounts of the Assam State Branch of Red Cross Society, direction...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 28 2006

Paltanbazar Municipal Corpn. Market Dealers Association and ors. Vs. R ...

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Nov-28-2006

Subject : Property

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. D.K. Bhattacharyya

A. Hazarika, J.1. Both the appeals were heard together in view of the fact that, both the appeals were preferred by the Defendant Nos. 3 and 4 and 5 to 26 against the judgment and decree...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 26 2004

Apurba Poddar and anr. Vs. State of Assam

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Aug-26-2004

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 7, 16, 16A, 17, 19, 245 and 245(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482, 561 and 561A; Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules - Rule 12A

Advocate for Respondent : V.M. Sinha, Adv.

I.A. Ansari, J.1. In the offence report, which gave rise to CR Case No. 308c/2001 of the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kamrup, Guwahati, the case of the complainant, namely, Khagendra Nath Goswami, Food Inspector...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 10 2006

K.S. Oils Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Assam

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Aug-10-2006

Subject : Food Adultration

I.A. Ansari, J.1. In a prosecution launched under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (in short, the 'PFA Act'), against a company or a firm, a question, which though not very often, arises for determination...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 17 1980

Jaskaran Lodha Vs. the State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Jan-17-1980

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1981CriLJ103

1. Two, questions have been raised in this criminal revision:1. Whether a Magistrate is legally competent to send "the second part of the sample" to the Director of Central Food Laboratory when the Director had expressed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 2002

Glaxo India Ltd. Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Aug-21-2002

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 - Rules 7, 16 and 37A

Advocate for Respondent : P.C. Gayan, PP and R.K. Jain, Adv.

A.H. Saikia, J. 1. Both these Criminal Revisions were heard and allowed by order dated 21.8.2002 for the reasons to be recorded later on and accordingly the reasons for allowing those revisions are stated as follows:2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 17 1980

Jaskaran Lodha Vs. the State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Jan-17-1980

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1981CriLJ103

ORDERK. Lahiri, J.1. Two, questions have been raised in this criminal revision:1. Whether a Magistrate is legally competent to send 'the second part of the sample' to the Director of Central Food Laboratory when the Director...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial