Advanced Search Results

Sailesh Developers, a Registered Partnership Firm and Mr. Ramesh Bhava ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 31A, 32, 34, 35, 36, 36(1), 37, 38, 39, 41A to 41E, 50, 50A, 51, 59, 73 and 73A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 92; Bombay Public Trusts (Amendment) Act, 1960 - Sections 36; Maharashtra Public Trusts (Amendment) Act, 1971; Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882; Provincial Small Cause Court Act, 1887; Uttar Pradesh Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 11(1); Official Trustees Act, 1913 - Sections 25 and 26; Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1966; Bombay Public Trusts Rules, 1951 - Rules 2, 7, 7A and 24; O.S. High Court Rules - Rule 28; Constitution of India - Articles 26, 226 and 227

Reported in : 2007(4)ALLMR100; 2007(3)BomCR7

Advocate for Respondent : R.M. Sawant, Govt. Pleader for Respondent No. 1, ;Shyam Mehta and ;Cyrus Ardeshir, Advs., i/b., Madekar Co. for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3, ;Virendra V. Tulzapurkar and ;P.K. Samdani, Sr. Counsels, ;Sand

1. A Division Bench of this Court (Coram Smt. Ranjana Desai and Abhay S. Oka, JJ) found that there was a divergence of opinion between two Division Benches of this Court as regards powers of Charity...

Gammon India Limited Vs. the Securities and Exchange Board of India

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2008)85SCL298SAT

1. This order will dispose of three Appeals No. 32, 33 and 45 of 2007 in which common questions of law and fact arise. Since arguments were addressed in Appeal No. 32 of 2007, the facts...

Oil and Natural Gas Commission Vs. Offshore Enterprises Inc.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 3 - Rules 2 and 4 - Order XIX - Rule 2; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 31, 34(1) and 49; Bar Council of India Rules - Rules 9, 10 and 13; Bombay High Court Rules - Rules 9 and 13

Reported in : AIR1993Bom217; 1993(2)BomCR618; (1993)95BOMLR396; 1993(1)MhLj243

1. While hearing Arbitration Petition No. 210 of 1989, I found that Shri Atul Munim and Shri Pramod Dalai, Partners of Messrs. Bachubhai Munim and Co., a firm of Advocates, had filed their own affidavits as...

Kaikhosrou (Chick) Kavasji Framji of Indian Inhabitant and Jawahir (Je ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Public Premises Premises Act - Sections 2, 2B, 3, 4, 4(1), 5, 5(2), 9, 9(4), 13, 14 and 15; Uttar Pradesh Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1972; Public Premises Eviction Act, 1971; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 3; Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905 - Sections 6; Madras Land Encroachment Act, 1950; Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment (Amendment) Act, 1980; Tamil Nadu Public Premises Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants Act; Bombay Rent Act - Sections 4(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 41, Rule 27; Constitution of India - Articles 133, 136, 141, 146 and 226; Tenancy and Land Laws

Reported in : 2009(5)BomCR200; 2009(111)BomLR2641

Advocate for Respondent : S.R. Rajguru, ;J.C. Satpute, ;A.D. Kango and ;D.A. Dubey, Advs.

V.C. Daga, J.1. The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the notice dated 31st July, 2001, (the impugned notice) issued by the respondent No. 2 to the petitioners...

Sebi Vs. Cholamandalam Securities Ltd.

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. Securities and Exchange Board of India (hereinafter referred to as SEBI) conducted investigation into the dealings in the scrip of Moschip Semiconductors Limited (hereinafter referred to as 'Moschip') for the period May 07, 2001 to...

State of Maharashtra, Through Deputy Commissioner of Police Vs. Shashi ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. R.R.Vyas

Oral Judgment (Per B.R. Gavai, J.) The State of Maharashtra has approached this Court being aggrieved by the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Nagpur in Misc. Criminal Application No. 683 of 2013,...

Reliance Energy Limited Vs. the Tata Power Company Limited and

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL662

1. In Appeal 31 of 2005, the Appellant, M/s Reliance Energy, hereinafter referred as "REL" for brevity, has prayed this Appellate Tribunal: (i) To set aside the Order dated 3^rd July, 2003, passed by the Maharashtra...

Rohinton Panthaky and Others Vs. ArmIn R. Panthaky

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

1. In Notice of Motion No.6 of 2014, leave to intervene granted in terms of prayer (a) limited to the present hearing, as the applicants are the trustees of the Parsi Panchayet Funds and Properties and...

Jamshed Kanga and Others Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 47, 37; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 19(1)(d), 48A

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. D.J. Khambata; Mr. C.S. Balsara; A.S. Dayal; Mr. Ravi Kadam; Mr. K.R. Belosey; Mr. N.P Pandit, Advs.

1. By this petition, the petitioners challenge the order dated 9 July 2009 passed by the then Chief Minister Mr. Sushilkumar Shinde allowing an appeal under section 47 of the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966...

Karan Dileep Nevatia Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) Through the Commerce ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 3, 58A, 139(1) and 143(2); Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 90 and 90(2); General Clauses Act - Sections 3(29); Punjab Municipal Corporation Act - Sections 90(5); Tamil Nadu Motor Vehicles Taxation Act; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 19(5), 51, 73, 226, 245, 246, 246(3), 247 to 252, 253 and 256; Bombay Foreign Liquor and Rectified Spirit (Transport) Fee Rules, 1954; Maharashtra Potable Liquor (Fixation of Maximum Retail Prices) Rules, 2009

Reported in : 2010(112)BomLR127; 2010(172)LC1(Bombay)

Advocate for Respondent : D.J. Khambata, Addl. Solicitor General, ;S.V. Bharucha and ;D.A. Dube, Advs. for Respondent 1 and ;S.S. Bhende, A.G.P. for Respondents 2 to 4

Ranjana Desai, J.1. Rule. Respondents waive service. By consent of the parties, taken up for final hearing forthwith.2. The petitioner is engaged in the import of foreign liquor viz. wines and distribution of the same under...