Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: d h mehta · Page 1 of about 94 results (0.224 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 12 2001

Boi Finance Ltd. Vs. Liquidator of Siddhart Engg. Pvt. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-12-2001

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 37, Rule 2; High Court Original Side Rules - Rule 222; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 446; Companies Court Rules - Rule 156; Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 - Sections 33, 37 and 52B

Reported in : AIR2001Bom397; 2001(3)ALLMR750; 2001(4)BomCR151; (2001)3BOMLR294; (2000)3CompLJ167(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. D.H. Mehta and ;Mr. M.P. Wamorkar, Advs. and ;Official Liquidator

ORDERDr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J.1. The Summons for judgment has been withdrawn as against Defendant No. 3 and consequently, it is pressed only as against Defendant Nos. 1, 2 and 4.2. An order has been passed on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 1992

Dhankumar Thakordas Javeri and ors. Vs. Municipal Corporation of Great ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-30-1992

Subject : Civil

Acts : Greater Bombay Development Control Rules

Reported in : 1992(3)BomCR59

Advocate for Respondent : K.K. Singhvi and ; G.V. Murthy, Advs. for respondent Nos. 1 and 2, ; L.H. Vyas, Adv. for respondent Nos. 3 to 4, 4A, 6 and 9, ; D.H. Mehta, Adv., i/b., Haridas & Co. for respondent No. 7

A.A. Cazi, J.1. This writ petition is directed against three permissions/licenses (Exs. 'T-1', 'T-2', and 'T-3') issued by respondent Nos. 1 to 6 and 9 and 9-A to run the eating house 'Revival' which is on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 06 1999

Ghoom Tax (India) P. Ltd. and Asia Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-06-1999

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2000)(67)ECC471

1. These two applications arise out of the same order-in-appeal, and are therefore being disposed of by this common order.2. The applicants in both cases were engaged in texturising of yarn.The texturised yarn was not covered...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 07 2014

B.C. Jhaveri and Another Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-07-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. By this Writ Petition under article 226 of the Constitution of India the Petitioners pray for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari or any other Writ in the nature thereof to call for all records...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 07 2014

B.C. Jhaveri and Another Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-07-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. By this Writ Petition under article 226 of the Constitution of India the Petitioners pray for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari or any other Writ in the nature thereof to call for all records...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 02 2003

Satidham Inds. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Cus. and C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-02-2003

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2003)(159)ELT401Tri(Mum.)bai

1. These three appeals have been filed by the appellants against the decision of the Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, Surat, confirming the duty and imposing penalty of Rs. 50 lakhs under Rule 1730(1), Rs....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 28 1992

Dhurunal Chhotalal Patel Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-28-1992

Subject : Excise

Acts : Customs Tariff Act, 1975

Reported in : 1993(63)ELT25(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Shri H.V. Mehta and;J.P. Deodhar, Advs.

ORDERKurdukar, J.1. The petitioner in this petition has raised a question as regards excisability of the Copper Scrap. The question is whether Copper Scrap imported by the petitioner falls under residuary Items 68 or Item 26A...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 24 1998

Om Siddharaj Co-operative Housing Society Limited Vs. the State of Mah ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-24-1998

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 22, 30 and 154; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules, 1961 - Rule 25; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1998(4)BomCR506

Advocate for Respondent : Abhay Patki, Adv.

ORDERDr. B.P. Saraf, J. 1. By this appeal the appellant Co-operative Housing Society seeks to challenge the order of the learned Single Judge dated 2nd March 1998 rejecting the writ petition of the appellant society against...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 20 1992

Dhurunal Chhotalal Patel Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-20-1992

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 1993(46)LC113(Kerala)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. H.V. Mehta

S.P. Kurdukar, J.1. The petitioner in this petition has raised a question as regards excisability of the Copper Scrap. The question is whether Copper Scrap imported by the petitioner falls under residuary Item 68 or Item...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 06 1999

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Nathani Machinery Mfg. Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-06-1999

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1999)(65)ECC553

1. This appeal from revenue was argued by Shri G.B. Yadav, Shri D.H.Mehta, Advocate, appeared for the respondents.2. The first issue for decision is whether a manufacturer operating under Notification 175/86 could avail of the facility...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial