Advanced Search Results
Boi Finance Ltd. Vs. Liquidator of Siddhart Engg. Pvt. Ltd. and ors.
Mumbai
Feb-12-2001
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 37, Rule 2; High Court Original Side Rules - Rule 222; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 446; Companies Court Rules - Rule 156; Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 - Sections 33, 37 and 52B
AIR2001Bom397; 2001(3)ALLMR750; 2001(4)BomCR151; (2001)3BOMLR294; (2000)3CompLJ167(Bom)
Mr. D.H. Mehta and ;Mr. M.P. Wamorkar, Advs. and ;Official Liquidator
ORDERDr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J.1. The Summons for judgment has been withdrawn as against Defendant No. 3 and consequently, it is pressed only as against Defendant Nos. 1, 2 and 4.2. An order has been passed on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDhankumar Thakordas Javeri and ors. Vs. Municipal Corporation of Great ...
Mumbai
Mar-30-1992
Civil
Greater Bombay Development Control Rules
1992(3)BomCR59
K.K. Singhvi and ; G.V. Murthy, Advs. for respondent Nos. 1 and 2, ; L.H. Vyas, Adv. for respondent Nos. 3 to 4, 4A, 6 and 9, ; D.H. Mehta, Adv., i/b., Haridas & Co. for respondent No. 7
A.A. Cazi, J.1. This writ petition is directed against three permissions/licenses (Exs. 'T-1', 'T-2', and 'T-3') issued by respondent Nos. 1 to 6 and 9 and 9-A to run the eating house 'Revival' which is on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGhoom Tax (India) P. Ltd. and Asia Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Aug-06-1999
Service Tax
(2000)(67)ECC471
1. These two applications arise out of the same order-in-appeal, and are therefore being disposed of by this common order.2. The applicants in both cases were engaged in texturising of yarn.The texturised yarn was not covered...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
B.C. Jhaveri and Another Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Mumbai
Jan-07-2014
Land Acquisition
1. By this Writ Petition under article 226 of the Constitution of India the Petitioners pray for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari or any other Writ in the nature thereof to call for all records...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskB.C. Jhaveri and Another Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Mumbai
Jan-07-2014
Land Acquisition
1. By this Writ Petition under article 226 of the Constitution of India the Petitioners pray for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari or any other Writ in the nature thereof to call for all records...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSatidham Inds. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Cus. and C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Jan-02-2003
Land Acquisition
(2003)(159)ELT401Tri(Mum.)bai
1. These three appeals have been filed by the appellants against the decision of the Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, Surat, confirming the duty and imposing penalty of Rs. 50 lakhs under Rule 1730(1), Rs....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDhurunal Chhotalal Patel Vs. Union of India
Mumbai
Aug-28-1992
Excise
1993(63)ELT25(Bom)
Shri H.V. Mehta and;J.P. Deodhar, Advs.
ORDERKurdukar, J.1. The petitioner in this petition has raised a question as regards excisability of the Copper Scrap. The question is whether Copper Scrap imported by the petitioner falls under residuary Items 68 or Item 26A...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOm Siddharaj Co-operative Housing Society Limited Vs. the State of Mah ...
Mumbai
Jun-24-1998
Trusts and Societies
Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 22, 30 and 154; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules, 1961 - Rule 25; Constitution of India - Article 226
1998(4)BomCR506
Abhay Patki, Adv.
ORDERDr. B.P. Saraf, J. 1. By this appeal the appellant Co-operative Housing Society seeks to challenge the order of the learned Single Judge dated 2nd March 1998 rejecting the writ petition of the appellant society against...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDhurunal Chhotalal Patel Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Kerala
Aug-20-1992
Excise
1993(46)LC113(Kerala)
Mr. H.V. Mehta
S.P. Kurdukar, J.1. The petitioner in this petition has raised a question as regards excisability of the Copper Scrap. The question is whether Copper Scrap imported by the petitioner falls under residuary Item 68 or Item...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Nathani Machinery Mfg. Pvt. Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Apr-06-1999
Land Acquisition
(1999)(65)ECC553
1. This appeal from revenue was argued by Shri G.B. Yadav, Shri D.H.Mehta, Advocate, appeared for the respondents.2. The first issue for decision is whether a manufacturer operating under Notification 175/86 could avail of the facility...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »