Advanced Search Results
State of Jammu and Kashmir Vs. A.R. Zakki and Others
Supreme Court of India
Dec-06-1991
ConstitutionService
Constitution of India - Articles 226, 229, 234 and 245; Jammu & Kashmir Civil Services (Judicial) Recruitment Rules, 1967 - Rule 4
AIR1992SC1546; JT1992(1)SC59; 1991(2)SCALE1331; 1992Supp(1)SCC548; [1991]Supp3SCR216
D.D. Thakur, ; L.K. Gupta and ; R. Sasiprobhu, Advs.
ORDERS.C. Agrawal, J.1. Special leave granted.2. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.3. This appeal arises out of the judgment and order dated February 22, 1991 of the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir. It relates to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. S.K. Kacker Vs. All India Institute of Medical Sciences and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Sep-04-1996
Service
1996VIIAD(SC)331; [1996(74)FLR2505]; JT1996(8)SC513; 1996LabIC2736; 1996(7)SCALE1; (1996)10SCC734; [1996]Supp5SCR540; 1997(1)SLJ35(SC); (1997)1UPLBEC316
D.D. Thakur, ; Mukta Gupta, ; Mukul Gupta, ;
ORDER1. Leave granted.2. While Dr. S.K. Kacker, an eminent professor in Otorphinolaryngology, was working as professor and Head of the ENT Department in the respondent-AIIMS, an advertisement had come to be made on June 29, 1990...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNehru Yuva Kendra Sangathan Vs. Yogendra Singh and anr.
Delhi
Aug-02-2000
Constitution
[2001(88)FLR173]
Mr. D.D. Thakur, Sr. Adv., ; Mr. Rakesh Kumar Singh and ;
ORDERArun Kumar, J.1. Rule D.B. 2. Since short point is involved the matter is taken up at this stage for final argument and disposal. 3. These three appeals arise from a common judgment of a learned...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Dr. Bir Singh Vs. All India Institute of Medical Sciences
Delhi
May-22-1998
Service
Service Law
73(1998)DLT830; 1998(46)DRJ143
D.D. Thakur, Senior Adv., ; Mukta Gupta and ; Mukul Gupta
M.K. Sharma, J.1. In the present writ petition the petitioner has prayed for quashing of the action of the respondents for filling up 7 posts in the level of Additional Professor and Associate Professor through the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajasthan Housing Board and ors. Vs. Shri Kishan and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Jan-27-1993
Property
Rajasthan Land Acquisition Act, 1953 - Sections 4(1), 6, 17(1) and 17(4); Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 48
JT1993(1)SC298; 1993(1)SCALE183; (1993)2SCC84; [1993]1SCR269
Sri. D.D. Thakur
1. These appeals are preferred against the judgment of the Full Bench of the Rajasthan High Court allowing a batch of 16 special appeals. The special appeals were preferred against the judgment of a learned Single...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Jammu and Kashmir, Vs. Romesh Chander and Others
Supreme Court of India
Nov-27-1996
Environment
1996IXAD(SC)451; AIR1997SC2401; 1997(1)ALD(Cri)277; 1997CriLJ2976; 1996(4)Crimes270(SC); 1996(8)SCALE727; (1997)1SCC90; [1996]Supp9SCR239
D.D. Thakur, ; G.A. Lone, ; P. H. Parekh, ;
1. Delay condoned.2. Leave granted.3. We have heard learned Counsel on both sides.4. This appeal by special leave arises from the order of the High Court, of Jammu and Kashmir, made on April 23, 1992 in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. Subramanian Swamy Vs. Rama Krishna Hegde
Supreme Court of India
Aug-25-1998
Contempt of Court
(2000)10SCC331
D.D. Thakur, ; Ashok H. Desai and ; K.N. Bhat, Senior Advs.
ORDER1. These contempt matters relate to comments made by the alleged contemners against Shri Justice Kuldip Singh after he had submitted his report as Chairman of the Enquiry Commission set up by the Central Government. In...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGurdeep Singh Dau and Others Vs. Delhi Sikh Gurdwara Prabandhak Commit ...
Delhi
Jan-05-1995
Constitution
Constitution of India - Article 226; Delhi Sikh Gurudwaras Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 3, 5, 4, 15, 16, 31, 32 and 32; Gujarat University Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 19 and 21 - Rules 8, 9, 10 and 12
AIR1995Delhi182; ILR1995Delhi460
D.D. Thakur, Sr. Adv. and ; H.S. Rhandhawa, Adv.
ORDERD. P. Wadhwa, J.1. This, it wouldappear, is the second round of litigation. The first (CWP No. 2630/ 94) was dismissed on 26 July 1994 principally on the ground that the Court was not satisfied about...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAjit Singh and ors. Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Sep-16-1999
Service
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15(4), 16(1, 4 and 4A), 142 and 335; Punjab Secretariat Class III Service Rules, 1976 - Rules 7(1) and 9; Civil Secretariat Service, Class II Service Rules, 1963 - Rules 8(2) and 10; Punjab Civil Secretariat(Class I) Rules, 1974; Haryana Education Department(State Service, Group B) Rule, 1980 - Rules 9(3) and 11; State Reorganisation Act, 1956 - Sections 115(7)
AIR1999SC3471; JT1999(7)SC153; 2000(1)MPHT1; 1999(II)OLR(SC)401; 1999(5)SCALE556; (1999)7SCC209; [1999]Supp2SCR521; (2000)1UPLBEC195
ORDERM. Jagannadha Rao, J.1. We have before us these three Interlocutory Applications Nos. 1 to 3 filed for 'clarification' by the State of Punjab in Civil Appeal Nos. 3792-94 of 1989 (Ajit Singh Januja and Ors....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohinder Pal Vs. State of H.P. and ors.
Himachal Pradesh
May-09-1994
Constitution
Himachal Pradesh Kutlehar Forest (Acquisition of Management) Act, 1992 - Sections 1, 4 and 5; ;Constitution of India - Articles 31, 31A, 31A(1), 31A(2), 31C, 39 and 245
AIR1995HP15
B. Datta, Sr. Adv.,; M.S. Guleria, Dy. Adv. General,; Ha
Bhawani Singh, J. 1. The petitionerhas challenged the constitutional validity of the Himachal Pradesh Kutlehar Forest (Acquisition of Management) Act, 1992 (hereafter shortly, 'the Management Acquisition Act' or 'this Act'), on numerous grounds being recorded in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »