Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: d d calla · Page 1 of about 7 results (0.048 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 12 2004

Jagdish Chandra Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-12-2004

Subject : ConstitutionCivil

Acts : Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 - Sections 38 and 38(4)

Reported in : RLW2004(4)Raj2474; 2004(3)WLC363

Advocate for Respondent : D.D. Calla, Dy. G.A.

Sunil Kumar Garg, J.1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India on 4.11.03 against the respondents with a prayer that by an appropriate writ, order or direction...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 06 2003

Radhey Shyam Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Nov-06-2003

Subject : CivilCriminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302 and 498A

Reported in : RLW2004(1)Raj428; 2004(1)WLC536

Advocate for Respondent : D.D. Calla, Public Prosecutor

Mathur, J. 1. The instant appeal is directed against the judgment of the Sessions Judge, Jaisalmer dated 1.12.2000 convicting the appellant of offence under Section 302 I.P.C, and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 03 2004

Dinesh Pareek Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-03-2004

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Persons with disabilities (Equal opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : RLW2005(1)Raj289; 2005(1)WLC98

Advocate for Respondent : D.D. Calla, Dy. G.A.

Sunil Kumar Garg, J.1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner on 2.9.2003 against the respondents with a prayer that by an appropriate writ, order or...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 29 2003

Paramjeet Singh and anr. Vs. State and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Oct-29-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 311 and 482

Reported in : 2004CriLJ2653; RLW2004(2)Raj1004; 2004(1)WLC698

Advocate for Respondent : D.D. Calla, Public Prosecutor

N.N. Mathur, J.1. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the order of the trial court namely Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Anoopgarh dated 16.11.2002 whereby he has allowed the application filed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 03 2003

Dhara Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Dec-03-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 419, 467 and 471; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 482

Reported in : 2004CriLJ4075

Advocate for Respondent : D.D. Calla, Public Prosecutor

ORDERN.N. Mathur, J.1. By way of instant petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure the petitioner has challenged the order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Sojat Camp Jaitaran affirming the order dated 19-7-2000...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 19 2003

Manoj Kumar Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Dec-19-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 311

Reported in : 2004CriLJ3186; 2004(1)WLC81

Advocate for Respondent : D.D. Calla, Public Prosecutor and; B.K. Vyas, Adv.

ORDERN.N. Mathur, J.1. By way of instant petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure the petitioner seeks to quash the order of the Sessions Judge, Bikaner dated 27-9-2002 confirming the order of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 06 2002

Tasbeer Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Aug-06-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 6A

Reported in : 2003CriLJ3393; 2003WLC(Raj)UC144

Advocate for Respondent : D.D. Calla, Public Prosecutor

ORDERK.K. Acharya, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor.2. The brief facts of the case are that a F.I.R. was lodged at Police Station, Sadulshahar by one Om Prakash Jangid...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial