Advanced Search Results

Hari Ram Vs. Ratanlal

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Acts : Rajasthan High Court Rules, 1952 - Rule 159

Reported in : AIR1980Raj82

Advocate for Respondent : D.C. Sharma and; N.K. Jain, Advs.

ORDERP.D. Kudal, J.1. Arguments were heard on the application dated 27-7-1979, filed on behalf of the respondent Ratanlal.2. The contention of the respondent is that he had filed caveat on 23-7-1979. The writ petition was filed...

Sudesh Kumar Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1981WLN(UC)190

M.C. Jain, J.1. By this writ petition the petitioner has challenged the consolidated seniority list prepared for the Laboratory Assistant (Chemistry) and the Laboratory Assistant (Physics). As a result of the consolidated seniority list he was...

Kailash Chandra Vs. Sri Kishan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 - Sections 13(1)

Reported in : AIR1998Raj131; 1998WLC(Raj)UC273

Bhagwati Prasad, J. 1. The Court of Additional District Judge No. 1, Jodhpur made the instant reference to this Court under Section 113 of the Code of Civil Procedure (referred to hereinafter as 'C.P.C.') and Order...

Harbans Singh Vs. Punjab State

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Indian Arbitration Act - Sections 28 and 33; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 21

Reported in : AIR1960P& H182

ORDER(1) This revision is directed against the order of the learned Subordinate Judge, 1st Class, Amritsar, dated 17-5-1958, dismissing the application of Shri Harbans Singh Petitioner under S. 33 of the Indian Arbitration Act.(2) On 19-4-1954...

Md. Zafar Ali, Son of Mohd. Haidar Ali Vs. the State of Bihar

Court : Patna

Subject : Service

Acts : Bihar Police Manual - Rule 663(d)

1. This L.P.A has been filed against the common order dated 15.05.2007 passed by the learned Single Judge. It has been contended by the learned counsel for the appellants that the appellants have been appointed by...

Kanaram and 8 ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1987(1)WLN225

Farooq Hasan, J.1. Kanaram, Hanuman, Bhanwar alias Bhura, Jeewan, Gopiram, Ratna Ram, Chhitar, Phula and Mohan, all the appellants in this appeal are aggrieved against the judgment dated 23rd April. 1983, passed by the Sessions Judge,...

Birbal Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : 2(1997)ACC124

M.A.A. Khan, J. 1. On September 4,1993 PW.1 Nahar Singh, a tea vendor, reported to the police officials at police station Galta Gate. Jaipur that the driver of the Rajasthan State Roadways Delux Bus No. RJ-14...

Aktiebolaget Volvo and ors Vs. Kishore Purohit and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Trade Marks

Acts : Trade Mark Act, 1999 - Section 29(4)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sushant Singh; Mr. Tejinder Singh, Advs.

1. This is a suit for permanent injunction, mandatory injunction, grant of damages and delivering up of infringing material. The plaintiffs, are three separate companies, all registered in Sweden and the plaint has been signed and...

Union of India & Anr. Vs.d C Sharma & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Dr. K.S. Chauhan, Mr. Murari Lal, Mr. Ajit Kumar Ekka, Ms. Charu Lata Chaudhary

$~3. * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:23. 08.2017 + W.P.(C) 4871/2017 & C.M. No.21123/2017 UNION OF INDIA & ANR Through: Mr. R.N. Singh, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus D...

Hukam Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Rajasthan Panchayat Samities and Zila Parishad Act, 1959 - Sections - 39, 39(2), 39(4) and 39(8); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226 and 245

Reported in : AIR1984Raj119; 1983()WLN517

Advocate for Respondent : L.R. Mehta, Adv.

ORDERS.K.M. Lodha, J.1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution by Hukamsingh, seeking the following reliefs:--(1) that no-confidence motion Ex. P-10 dated Feb. 14, 1983 passed against him may be quashed.(2) that non-petitioner...