Advanced Search Results

In Re: Himachal Advanced Circuits Limited

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : SICACompany

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 16, 20(1), 20(2) and 22; ;Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19 and 21

Reported in : [2005]128CompCas901(HP)

Arun Kumar Goel, J.1. The Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR), forwarded its opinion formed under Section 20(1) of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions Act), 1985 (hereinafter referred to as 'the SICA'), as required...

Baldev Singh Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : ConstitutionService

Reported in : 2007(3)ShimLC100

Surinder Singh, J.1. The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction to the respondents.2. The questions...

Manjeet Kumar and Another Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and Another

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Dharam Chand Chaudhary, J. Challenge in these appeals is to the judgment dated 8.12.2008, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sirmaur District at Nahan, in Sessions Trial No. 20-N/7 of 2007, convicting and sentencing thereby the...

Himachal Shiksha Samiti Vs. State of H.P. and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Property

Reported in : 2007(2)ShimLC179

Sanjay Karol, J.1. This judgment is being dictated in open Court in presence of the learned Counsel for the parties.2. The present writ petition has been filed assailing the orders dated 11.11.2004 (Annexure P-9), whereby the...

inderjit Singh and anr. Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : 2007(1)ShimLC407

Deepak Gupta, J.1. The petitioners by means of this writ petition have prayed that the excess tax paid by them, orders for refund whereof have been made by the assessing authorities be ordered to be refunded...

State of H.P. Vs. Parkash Chand and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Section 30; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 201 and 302; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161 and 313

Reported in : 1997CriLJ1979

Advocate for Respondent : Harish Behal, Adv.

Arun Kumar Goel, J.1. Parkash Chand respondent, Smt. Saina Devi his mother and Tek Chand his brother have been acquitted by Shri Janeshwar Goel, Addl. Sessions Judge (1) Kangra Division at Dharamsala in Sessions Case No....

Satish Kumar Vs. State of H.P.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Section 27; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 102 and 302; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 154, 161 and 164

Reported in : 2005CriLJ3240

Advocate for Respondent : D.C. Pathik, Addl. A.G.

Arun Kumar Goel, J.1. For having committed the offence of culpable homicide, by having done to death his wife Smt. Kamlesh Kumari, appellant was charged under Section 302, IPC. After having been found guilty, he was...

Smt. Gulabi and Etc. Vs. State of H.P.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Section 23; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 57

Reported in : AIR1998HP9

Advocate for Respondent : D.C. Pathik, Addl. Adv. General

A.K. Goel, J.1. Since all the aforesaid appeals have arisen out of common award, as such we propose to take up and dispose of these appeals together and by a common judgment.2. Brief facts of this...

Bhupinder Kumar and ors. Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act - Sections 4, 6, 7 and 48; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2006(1)ShimLC322

Advocate for Respondent : M.S. Chandel, Adv. General,; D.C. Pathik, Additional Adv. General for Respondent Nos. 1, 2, 4 and 5 a

Surjit Singh, J.1. Through the present writ petition, the petitioners seek the quashing of communication dated 28.5.2005, whereby their representation for de-notifying the acquisition of their property has been rejected and also Annexures P-10, P-11 and...

Ram Kishan and 2 ors. Vs. State of H.P.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Section 438; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 406 and 498A

Reported in : 2003(2)ALT(Cri)10,II(2003)DMC424

Advocate for Respondent : D.C. Pathik, Addl. A.G.

M.R. Verma, J.1. Since these three applications Under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure {hereafter referred to as 'the Code') for grant of anticipatory bail filed by the petitioners/accused (hereafter referred to as 'the...