Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: d b padhye · Page 1 of about 31 results (0.029 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 22 1964

Kesardeo Baijnath Vs. Nathmal Kisanalal

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-22-1964

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 2(12) - Order 20, Rule 12; Central Provinces and Berar Letting of Houses and Rents Control Order, 1949

Reported in : AIR1966Bom266; ILR1965Bom363

Advocate for Respondent : D.B. Padhye, Adv.

[1] The Short question involved in this appeal is regarding the mode of computing mesne of profits and the amount of mesne profits which would eventually follows:[2] The house in dispute of was contracted more than...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 05 1965

Sk. Ahmad Sk. Abdulla Vs. Giridhar Bhagwansa Jirapure

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-05-1965

Subject : Election

Reported in : (1965)67BOMLR845

Wagle, J.1. This is an application in revision under Section 20-A(5) of the C.P. & Berar Municipalities Act, 1.922, The facts which need a mention are the following:2. On June 16, 1962, election for a seat...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 18 1961

National Garage, Nagpur (by Managing Director) Vs. Gonsalves J.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-18-1961

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 25F; Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1957

Reported in : AIR1962Bom152; (1961)63BOMLR989; ILR1962Bom36; (1962)ILLJ56Bom

ORDERTambe, J.1. Sri D. B. Padhye, learned counsel for the petitioner, contends that both the respondents 2 and 3 were in error in holding that termination of respondent 1's services amounted to retrenchment. According to Sri...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 10 1957

Abdul Rahim Khan Vs. Municipal Committee, Khamgaon and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-10-1957

Subject : Service

Acts : Central Provinces and Berar Municipalities Act, 1922 - Sections 25(6), 25(7) and 176(2); Central Provinces and Berar Municipalities Rules - Rule 2; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 311

Reported in : AIR1958Bom260; (1958)60BOMLR767; ILR1960Bom225

Advocate for Respondent : C.P. Kalele, Adv.

Y.S. Tambe, J.1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner Abdul Rahim Khan prays for a writ of certiorari Quashing the order dated 13-4-1957 made by the Additional Deputy Commissioner,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 13 1964

Jamnadas and anr. Vs. Commissioner of Wealth-tax, Bombay and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-13-1964

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 14, 14(2), 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21, 25(1) and 30

Reported in : [1965]56ITR648(Bom); 1965MhLJ55

Advocate for Respondent : D.B. Padhye, Adv.

K.K. Desai, J.1. In this petition under article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioners who are the joint executors appointed by the last will and testament dated April 8, 1959, of one Sohadradevi N. Daga, have...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 17 1962

Vasant Raghunath Gokhale Vs. the State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-17-1962

Subject : Service

Acts : Bombay Civil Services Rules - Rules 9, 33, 49, 131, 150, 151, 152, 152(2), 152(3), 152(5), 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158 and 159; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 309; Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal ) Rules - Rule 55

Reported in : AIR1963Bom137; (1963)65BOMLR54; ILR1963Bom537

Advocate for Respondent : D.B. Padhye, Asstt. Govt. Pleader

Abhyankar, J. 1. This is a petition under Art, 226 of the Constitution. The petitioner was appointed as Revenue Inspector on 7-12-1946 in the then State of Madhya Pradesh. He was confirmed in that capacity on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 04 1961

State Vs. Ramjivan Kaluram and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-04-1961

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 145(1) and 145(4)

Reported in : AIR1962Bom8; (1961)63BOMLR570; ILR1961Bom853

Advocate for Respondent : D.B. Padhye, ;M.R. Bobde, ;R.A. Saranjame and ;P.G. Palshikar, Advs.

Datar, J.(1) This is a reference made by the Additional District Magistrate of Amravati for setting aside the orders passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate in a proceeding under Section 145, Criminal Procedure Code, and for remanding...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 1965

Rekhchand Gopaldas Mohta Spinning and Weaving Mills Ltd. Vs. Commissio ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-06-1965

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 10(2)

Reported in : [1966]60ITR699(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : G.N. Joshi and ;D.B. Padhye, Advs.

Tambe, J.1. On a requisition made by this court under section 66(2) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, the Tribunal has forwarded a statement of the case referring the following question of law of this court...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 21 1962

Sitaram Maroti Girnale Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-21-1962

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(1), 5-A, 6, 17 and 17(4); M.P. Land revenue Code, 1955 - Sections 226, 226(1) and 226(2)

Reported in : AIR1963Bom242; (1963)65BOMLR241; 1963MhLJ235

Advocate for Respondent : D.B. Padhye, Asst. Govt. Pleader

Abhyankar, J. 1. The petitioner Sitaram is an owner of field survey No. 6/1 of mouza Kapustalni, having an area of 7 acre and 33 gunthas. He is aggrieved by the notification issued by the Commissioner,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 09 1964

Nava Samaj Limited and anr. Vs. the Registrar of Companies and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-09-1964

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 89, 89(1), 89(3), 89(4), 87, 88 and 90; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 14 and 21

Reported in : AIR1966Bom218; (1965)67BOMLR362; ILR1965Bom807

Advocate for Respondent : K.A. Bhabha, ;D.B. Padhye, Asst. Govt. Pleader, ;K.A. Bhabha, Adv.

Desai, J. (1) This is petition under article 226 of the constitution challenging the validity of an order of the central Government dated March 24, 1962, purported to have been passed under sub - section [4]...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial