Advanced Search Results

SanshIn Chemicals Industry Vs. Oriental Carbons and Chemicals Ltd. and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2, 18 to 27, 28 and 34

Reported in : AIR2001SC1219; JT2001(2)SC602; (2001)2MLJ194(SC); 2001(2)SCALE96; (2001)3SCC341; [2001]1SCR1101; MANU/SC/0109/2001

Advocate for Respondent : D.A. Dave, Sr. Adv., ; Ramesh Singh, ; Rajesh Kumar, Advs.

ORDERPattanaik, J.1. Leave Granted.2. This appeal by grant of special leave is directed against the judgment of Delhi High Court dated 8th of August, 2000. The question for consideration is whether a decision regarding the venue...

Collector of Central Excise, Chandigarh Vs. Smithkline Beecham Consume ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 8(1), 9(1) and 173G(1); Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3, 3(1), 4, 11A, 38A and 38A(C)

Reported in : AIR2003SC829; 2003(2)ALD30(SC); 2003(85)ECC241; 2003(151)ELT5(SC); (2003)1MLJ158(SC); (2003)2SCC169; [2002]SUPP5SCR633

Advocate for Respondent : D.A. Dave, Sr. Adv., ; A.R. Madhav Rao, ; T. Vishwanath,

Arijit Pasayat, J.1. These appeals are directed against common judgment of the Customs Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (in short 'the Tribunal').2. Background factual matrix involved is undisputed and is essentially as follows:3....

Gujarat Informatics Ltd. Vs. Creative Infocity Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act - Sections 2, 8, 9 and 36; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : (2009)2GLR1281

Advocate for Respondent : D.C. Dave, Adv. for Respondent No. 1

M.R. Shah, J.1. Rule Mr. D.C. Dave, learned Advocate waives the service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondent.2. With the consent of the learned Advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties, present...

Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Ltd. Vs. Aarti Steel Industries and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 21, 85 and 85(2); Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 2, 14, 14(2), 17, 30, 33, 37, 37(3) and 39; Indian Limitation Act, 1908; Arbitration (Protocol and Convention) Act, 1937; Foreign Awards (Recognition and Enforcement) Act, 1961

Reported in : (2002)1GLR186

Advocate for Respondent : D.C. Dave, Adv.

K.M. Mehta, J.1. Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Limited - Appellate (original respondent) has filed these First Appeal Nos. 1679 and 1680 of 2000 under Section 39 of Arbitration Act, 1940 (hereinafter be referred to as 'the...

Jayantilal Dhanjibhai Patel and anr. Vs. Rohitbhai Dhanjibhai BIn Goka ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rule 2A - Order 41, Rule 1 - Order 43, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR2002Guj197

Advocate for Respondent : D.C. Dave, Adv.

D.M. Dharmadhikari, C.J. 1. This LPA has been listed before us with Civil Application No. 9257 of 2001 filed by the appellants seeking condonation of delay caused in filing the LPA in Civil Application No. 3602...

Ahir Nimeshkumar Babubhai Vs. South Gujarat University

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India

Reported in : (2001)4GLR3577

Advocate for Respondent : D.C. Dave, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2

1. Rule, service of which is waived by learned advocate Mr D.C.Dave for the respondents. Upon request and considering the urgency, the matter is taken up for final hearing today.2. In substance, the question surfaced, in...

Mahendrasinhji Zoravarsinhji Sandhu Vs. Kamal B. Deval

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act - Sections 14(1), 15, 17, 30 and 35; Constitution of India

Reported in : (2001)1GLR89

Advocate for Respondent : P. Raval, Adv. for D.C. Dave, Adv. for Respondent No. 1 and Uday Joshi, Adv. for Trivedi & Gupta for Respondent No. 2

M.R. Calla, J.1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 15th June 1996 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kachchh at Bhuj in Special Civil Suit No.33 of 1983.2. The brief facts giving rise...

Vidarbha Ayurved Mahavidyalaya and Others Vs. Tuleshwar Mangalmurti Dh ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Education

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J. The grievance and demand in all these writ petitions is in respect of superannuation pension. Writ Petition No. 5771 of 2011 seeks that benefit for the Teachers in Non-Government aided Ayurvedic Colleges affiliated...

Creative Infocity Ltd. Vs. Gujarat Informatics Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 5, 8, 11 and 16; Gujarat Infrastructure Development Act, 1999 - Sections 2, 4 and 7; Companies Act, 1956; Evidence Act - Sections 91 and 92; Constitution of India - Articles 12 and 227; Gujarat Infrastructure Development Ordinance, 1999

Reported in : (2009)3GLR1877

Advocate for Respondent : S.N. Soparkar, Adv. for; Singhi and Co.

M.R. Shah, J.1. Rule. Mr. B.H. Chhatrapati, learned Advocate waives the service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondent.2. With the consent of the learned Advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties, the...

Valiben Wd/O Shakarabhai Alias Shankersing Virabhai and 2 ors. Vs. Sta ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Property

Acts : Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 8, 9, 10(1), 10(3), 10(5), 20, 20(1) and 23; Transfer of Property Act

Reported in : (2007)2GLR1278

Advocate for Respondent : Satyam Chayya, Agp for Respondent 1-2,; H.M. Parikh Adv. for Respondent-3 and;

Jayant Patel, J.1. The short facts of the case are that as per the petitioners, petitioner Nos. 1 & 2 are the owners of the land bearing Survey No. 622 admeasuring 16390 sq.mtr. & land bearing...