Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: cyriac joseph · Page 1 of about 9,338 results (0.161 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 18 1993

Paulose Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Feb-18-1993

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 7A

Reported in : (1993)IILLJ491Ker

Advocate for Respondent : Cyriac Joseph, Addl. Advocate General

Mathews P. Mathew, J.1. The petitioners in these Original Petitions are advocates. They challenge the procedure adopted by the 1st respondent-State Government for selection of candidates for appointment of Presiding Officers of the Industrial Tribunals proposed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 2006

Dr. Basawaraj Revanasiddappa Guragol S/O Revanasiddappa Vs. the State ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-31-2006

Subject : Service

Reported in : ILR2006KAR4555; 2007(5)KarLJ655;

Cyriac Joseph, C.J.1. The appellant is the petitioner in Writ Petition No. 25424/2004 which was dismissed by the learned single Judge. The challenge in the Writ Petition was against Annexure-'K' notification dated 10.1.2003 containing the final...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 31 1991

Excel Glasses Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Oct-31-1991

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 31, 31C, 39, 43 and 141; ;Industrial Establishments (National and Festival Holidays) Amendment Act, 1990 (Kerala)

Reported in : (1992)IILLJ330Ker

Advocate for Respondent : Cyriac Joseph, Addl. Adv. General,; P. Balagangadhara Menon and;

Padmanabhan, J. Kerala Industrial Establishments (National and Festival Holidays) Act (for brevity, the Act) came into force on December 29, 1988, providing for seven paid holidays, comprised of three national and four festival holidays. National holidays...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 16 1989

V.D. Devassia Vs. Micheal Joseph

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Nov-16-1989

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115

Reported in : AIR1990Ker261

Advocate for Respondent : Cyriac Joseph, Adv.

M.M. Pareed Pillay, J. 1. Defendant is the appellant. Plaintiff (respondent) filed the suit for eviction of the defendant who is a tenant of the plaint schedule building. The trial Court. decreed the suit and it...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 25 2007

M.K. Jagadeesh S/O M.S. Kempaiah Vs. the Registrar General, High Court ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-25-2007

Subject : Service

Acts : Karnataka Civil Services (General Recruitment) Rules, 1977 - Rule 16; Karnataka Government Servants' (Seniority) Rules, 1957 - Rule 6

Reported in : 2008(6)KarLJ157; 2008(3)KCCR1863; 2008(5)AIRKarR164(DB)

Cyriac Joseph, C.J.1. The appellant is the petitioner in Writ Petition No. 8924/2007 which was dismissed by the learned Single Judge. The respondents in the Writ Appeal are the respondents in the Writ Petition.2. While the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 21 2007

S.R. Patil S/O. Ramagouda Patil Vs. State of Karnataka, by Its Secreta ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-21-2007

Subject : Service

Acts : Karnataka Law Officers (Appointment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1977 - Rules 5, 5(2), 5(6) and 26(3)

Reported in : ILR2007KAR4653; 2007(6)KarLJ405; 2007(4)KCCR2332; 2007(5)AIRKarR107(DB)

Advocate for Respondent : Pramila Nesargi, Sr. Adv. and ;C.H. Jadhav, Adv. for C/R.2

Cyriac Joseph, C.J.1. This Writ Appeal is filed against the judgment dated 22.11.2006 in Writ Petition No. 15359/2006 which was allowed by the learned Single Judge. The appellant is the second respondent in the Writ Petition....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 07 2009

Action Committee, Un-aided Pvt. Schools and ors. Vs. Director of Educa ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-07-2009

Subject : Civil

Acts : Delhi School Education Act, 1973 - Sections 3, 5, 8(4), 17(1), 17(2), 17(3), 18, 18(4), 18(5), 24, 24(2), 24(3), 24(4), 27 and 28; Delhi Schools Education Rules, 1973 - Rules 50, 51, 172, 173, 175, 176, 177, 177(1), 177(2) and 180; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Sections 115(4); Societies Registration Act, 1860; Constitution of India - Articles 19, 19(1), 19(6), 30, 30(1), 38, 41, 46, 137 and 141; Supreme Court Rules 1966

Reported in : 108(2009)CLT842(SC); 162(2009)DLT50(SC); JT2009(11)SC383; 2009(II)OLR(SC)665; 2009(11)SCALE77; (2009)10SCC1

S.B. Sinha, J.1. The Parliament enacted the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 (for short 'the Act') to provide for better organization and development of school education in the National Capital Territory of Delhi (NCT) and for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 23 2008

Sri SharfuddIn (Since Dead by L.Rs. Faimunnisa Begum W/O Late Sharfudd ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-23-2008

Subject : Service

Reported in : [2008(117)FLR855]; ILR2008KAR1629; 2008(4)KarLJ117; 2008(2)KCCR858; 2008(3)AIRKarR120; 2008LabIC(NOC)798(Kar)(DB)

Advocate for Respondent : Srinivasa Murthy, Adv. for; Law Associates

Cyriac Joseph, C.J.1. We have heard learned Counsel for the appellants and the learned Counsel for the respondent No.2.2. The appellants were the petitioners in Writ Petition No. 3116 of 2003 which was dismissed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 14 2007

General Manager, Bsnl Vs. Asst. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-14-2007

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 85

Reported in : 2009[16]STR262

Cyriac Joseph, C.J.1. Having heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and having considered the averments in the Writ Petition, we do not find any merit in the Writ Petition. We are in complete agreement with the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 16 2008

Deepa Bhargava and anr. Vs. Mahesh Bhargava and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-16-2008

Subject : Civil

Acts : Contract Act - Sections 59 to 61 and 74; Usurious Loans Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 47 - Order 23, Rule 3

Reported in : 2009(2)AWC1409(SC); JT2009(1)SC151; (2009)153PLR521; RLW2009(1)SC688; 2008(16)SCALE305; (2009)2SCC294; 2009(1)LHSC

Advocate for Respondent : Shiv Sagar Tiwari, ; Varun Thakur and ; Rajesh Singh, Ad

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Whether the terms of a consent decree can be varied by the executing court is the question involved in this appeal which arises out of a judgment and order dated 29.9.2006...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial