Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: crown prosecutor · Page 1 of about 168 results (0.114 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 02 1949

In Re: T. Ethirajulu Naidu

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-02-1949

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Madras Prohibition Act, 1937 - Sections 3 and 4(1)

Reported in : AIR1950Mad145

Advocate for Respondent : G. Gopinath for the Crown prosecutor

ORDERSomasundaram, J.1. The accused has been convicted by the Chief Presidency Magistrate under Section 4 (l) (a), Madras Prohibition Act and sentenced to pay a fine of RS. 50.2. The accused is a carpenter and in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 24 1936

Emperor Vs. John Mciver

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-24-1936

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1936Mad353

Cornish, J.1. Two points of law arising in the trial of John McIver for criminal breach of trust at the last criminal Sessions have been reserved to us for decision under Clause 25 of the Letters...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 24 1936

Rex Vs. John Mciver

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-24-1936

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1936)70MLJ635

Cronish, J.1. Two points of law arising in the trial of John McIver for criminal breach of trust at the last Criminal Sessions have been reserved to us for decision under Clause 25 of the Letters...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 26 1929

Emperor Vs. Krishnaji Prabhakar Khadilkar

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-26-1929

Subject : Media and CommunicationCriminal

Reported in : (1929)31BOMLR602

Mirza, J.1. The applicant is the editor of a Marathi daily called the Nava Kal which has a circulation of about ten to twelve thousand copies per day amongst the Marathi speaking public. He is being...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 08 2008

Ramadhar Lall Vs. State of Assam

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Aug-08-2008

Subject : Criminal

I.A. Ansari, J.1. By making this application, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, (in short, 'the Code'), the petitioner, who is an accused in GR Case No. 3816/1998, arising out of Bharalumukh P.S....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 12 1935

The Crown Prosecutor Vs. J. Mciver and

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-12-1935

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 159Ind.Cas.656; (1935)69MLJ681

Madhavan Nair, J.1. One Rao Bahadur Soora Lakshmiah Chetty by his agent Gopalaswamy Chetty instituted a complaint in the Court of the Chief Presidency Magistrate, Egmore, Madras against J. Mclver the senior partner of Messrs. Huson...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 1909

Emperor Vs. Moonoosawmy and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-22-1909

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2Ind.Cas.84

1. The accused were charged by the Police with an offence punishable under Section 75, Madras City Police Act, III of 1888, in that they were drunk and disorderly in a certain arrack shop. The Presidency...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 20 1945

Emperor, Through Bachan Lal Vs. Subedar Singh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-20-1945

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1946All365

Yorke, J.1. This is a reference by the Assistant Sessions Judge of Etawah recommending that this Court do set aside under Section 215 an order made by a Magistrate committing a case to the Court of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 23 1918

The Crown Prosecutor Vs. Bhagavathi

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-23-1918

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1918)35MLJ559

Sadasiva Aiyar, J.1. This is an application by the Crown Prosecutor for quashing the commitment made by the 3rd Presidency Magistrate, George Town, Madras, to the High Court Sessions of a case falling under Section 304(A)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 10 1911

In Re: Abdul Rahiman

Court : Chennai

Decided on : May-10-1911

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1911)21MLJ766

Sundara Aiyar, J.1. The appellant, a young man of 19, has been convicted of an offence under Section 489(d), Indian Penal Code, that is, having in his possession instruments and materials for the purpose of being...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial