Advanced Search Results

Meera Pillay Mohammed Kunju Katuvankal Puthen Veedu Vs. Subramania Iye ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rules 66 and 90

Reported in : AIR1967Ker223

Advocate for Respondent : K.C. John,; T.P. Mathai and; S. Narayana Iyer, Advs.

ORDERT.S. Krishnamoorthy Iyer, J. 1. The Civil Revision Petition filed by the first defendant arises out of proceedings under Order 21, Rule 90, C. P. C. In execution at the decree of in O. S. 175...

Shiv Bhagwan Moti Ram Saraoji Vs. Onkarmal Ishar Dass and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9, 17, 20 and 35 - Order 14, Rule 2; Specific Relief Act - Sections 7 and 39; Dekkhan Agriculturists' Relief Act

Reported in : AIR1952Bom365; (1952)54BOMLR330

Advocate for Respondent : K.T. Desai, ;M.L. Maneksha and ;Ajit Mehta, Advs.

Chagla, C.J.(1) This appeal raises a very interesting and important question as to the jurisdiction of this Court. Mr. Justice Shah took the view that this Court had no jurisdiction to try the plaintiff's suit, and...

Sri La Sri Subramania Desiga Gnanasambanda Pandara Sannadhi, Trustee o ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Madras Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1951 - Sections 58(2), 62, 62(2), 62(3) and 103; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 92; Madras Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments (Amendment) Act, 1959 - Sections 45

Reported in : [1965]2SCR934

Subba Rao, J. 1. Sri Vaidyanathaswami Temple at Vaitheeswarankoil, Sirkali Taluk, Thanjavur District, Madras State, is an ancient and famous Siva temple. It owns a large extent of immovable property and it is said that its...

Sundaram Nadar Vs. Sukumaran

Court : Chennai

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Benami Transaction Prohibition Act, 1988 -- Sections 3 and 4(2); Evidence Act, 1872 -- Sections 101 to 103; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 -- Sections 100; Indian Trust Act, 1882; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34

Reported in : 2000(3)CTC473

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Peppin Fernando, Adv.

ORDER1. The plaintiff in O.S.No.11 of 1981 on the file of the Subordinate Judge's Court, Kuzhithurai, is the appellant in the second appeal. 2. The parties are father and son. The suit was filed by the...

Bolani Ores Ltd. Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 2(18); Bihar and Orissa Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1930; State Motor Vehicles Taxation Act

Reported in : AIR1975SC17; (1974)2SCC777; [1975]2SCR138

Advocate for Respondent : V.M. Tarkunde, ; Santosh Chatterjee, ; R.N. Sachthey and ;

P. Jaganmohan Reddy, J.1. These appeals raise a common question as to whether Dumpers, Rockers and Tractors are motor vehicles within the meaning of the relevant State Motor Vehicles Taxation Acts, and are accordingly taxable thereunder....

Perumal Udayar and anr. Vs. Krishnama Chettyar and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1894)ILR17Mad251

1. The defendants were in possession of the mittah of Sundamangalam for the faslis 1293 to 1298 as purchasers in a sale made under the Revenue Recovery Act. It was ultimately held in a suit brought...

S.C.T. Al. Alagappa Chettiar Vs. S.S.C.T. Chidambaram Chettiar

Court : Chennai

Subject : PropertyCivil

Reported in : AIR1931Mad619

Curgenven, J.1. The plaintiff and the defendant are brothers by blood, being the sons of one Subramaniam Chettiar, and first cousins by adoption, the defendant having been adopted by his senior paternal uncle, Chidambaram Chetty. Chidambaram...

Kanthammal Vs. Bysani Sriramulu Chetti and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : LimitationProperty

Reported in : (1987)1MLJ300

Srinivasan, J.1. Though the question involved-in the appeal has turned out to be one within a narrow cumpass, the litigation has had a chequered career spreading over a period of 16 years, the seeds whereof were...

The Official Receiver of South Arcot, Representing Somasundaram Chetti ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : FamilyProperty

Reported in : AIR1946Mad519; (1946)1MLJ31

Patanjali Sastri, J.1. This appeal raises a question of some general importance to the Nattukottai Chettiar community of Southern India, viz., whether a son is entitled by the custom of the community to a joint interest...

Vummitti Subramaniam Chetty Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 184

Reported in : [1974]94ITR239(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : V. Balasubrahmanyan and ;J. Jayaraman, Advs.

Ramanujam, J. 1. One V. Subramaniam Chetty was carrying on business in yarn in his individual capacity from April, 1956. On March 31, 1961, a sum of Rs. 50,000 was transferred from his account to the...