Skip to content
Try for free

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: chetan sharma · Page 1 of about 566 results (0.149 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works
Dec 15 2004

Metcalfe and Hodgkinson Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Container Corporation of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-15-2004

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Insurance Act, 1938 - Sections 42(4) and 64UM ; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : AIR2005Delhi211; II(2005)BC48; 2005(1)CTLJ177(Del); 116(2005)DLT457; 2005(79)DRJ579

Advocate for Respondent : R.K. Joshi, Adv. for Respondent No. 1, ; Chetan Sharma, Sr. Adv., ;

D.K. Jain, J.1. RULE D.B. 2. Having regard to the urgency of the matter, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, it is taken up for final disposal at this stage itself. 3. Challenge...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Oct 26 2009

Bihar Tubes Ltd. Vs. Garg Ispat Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-26-2009

Subject : CommercialIntellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade Mark Act, 1999 - Sections 23(2), 28, 28(2), 28(3), 29, 30 and 34; Trade Mark Rules - Rule 62(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 7, Rules 10, 11 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : 166(2010)DLT109

Advocate for Respondent : Chetan Sharma, Sr. Adv. and ; Sanjay Aggarwal, Adv.

Rajiv Shakdher, J.IA No. 11296/2009 (Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 of CPC)1. In the captioned application filed by the Plaintiff under the provisions of Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 read with Section 151 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Aug 03 2006

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Vs. Dharam Chand Gupta

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-03-2006

Subject : Contract

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2007(I)CTLJ318(Del)

Advocate for Respondent : Sunil Goel, Adv.

Vijender Jain, A.C.J.1. Aggrieved by the order passed by the learned Single Judge, the appellant has filed the present appeal. Mr. Chetan Sharma, learned Counsel appearing for the appellant has contended that it is well settled...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works
Jul 02 2009

Lt. Col. Lalit Chawla (Retd.) Vs. Sh. Ashok Chawla and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-02-2009

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 47 and 151 - Order 21, Rules 54, 66 and 92 - Order 39, Rule 2A

Reported in : 161(2009)DLT78

Advocate for Respondent : Rajeeve Mehra, Sr. Adv., ; Payal Chawla Singh, ; M.S. Anant

Manmohan Singh, J.1. By this order, I propose to decide three applications being I.A.Nos.9244/08, 9741/08 and 9742/08.2. The brief facts are that the Plaintiff and Defendants No. 1 and 2 are the sons of Late Sh....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Jul 08 2003

Roop Lal Bhalla and ors. Vs. State and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-08-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 107, 131, 145 and 146

Reported in : 2003CriLJ4308; 106(2003)DLT388; 2003(70)DRJ194; 2003(3)JCC1422

Advocate for Respondent : Chetan Sharma, Sr. Adv. and ; Vikas Sharma, Adv. for respondent No.2 in Crl.R.311/2003 and ;

J.D. Kapoor, J.1. Both these petitions are interlinked and arise from the same set of facts and proceedings and are being decided together.2. Petitioners of Crl.R.311/2003 are challenging the order dated 7.4.2003 whereby Sub Divisional Magistrate...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Oct 30 2006

Hindustan Pencils Limited Vs. J.N. Ghosh and Bros. Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-30-2006

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Companies Act - Sections 12(3); Trade and Merchandise Act 1958 - Sections 11 and 18(1); Copyright Act - Sections 50; Trade Mark Act 1958 - Sections 31; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908

Reported in : LC2007(1)41; 2007(34)PTC49(Del)

Advocate for Respondent : Chetan Sharma, Sr. Adv. and ; V.P. Ghiriya, Adv.

Pradeep Nandrajog, J.1. Plaintiff, a company registered under the Companies Act claims to be in the business of manufacture and sale of stationery items since 1957. It claims that with effect from the year 1961 it...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Jan 13 2006

State Vs. Atbir and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-13-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34 and 302; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 43, 37, 129, 161, 235(2), 354(3) and 368

Reported in : 2006CriLJ1802; 127(2006)DLT100; 2006(86)DRJ796

Advocate for Respondent : Chetan Sharma, Sr. Adv. and ; R.R. Ojha, Adv., ; Ravinder C

Manmohan Sarin, J.1. Lust for two 'Z's i.e. Zar (wealth) and Zameen (Land) by the appellants led to the commission of this ghastly crime. The genesis lay in the second marriage of one of the appellant's...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Jul 23 2003

Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Pinkcity Midway Petroleums

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-23-2003

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 5, 8 and 16; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 115 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Standards of Weights and Measures (Enforcement) Act, 1985; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 8(1); Petroleum Act, 1934; Explosives Act, 1884; Weights and measures Act, 1976; Payment of Wages Act; Shops and Establishment Act; Factories Act; Workmen's Compensation Act

Reported in : AIR2003SC2881; 2003(5)ALD26(SC); 2003(2)ARBLR666(SC); 2003(4)AWC2674(SC); 2003(3)BLJR2433; (2003)4CompLJ311(SC); 2003(3)CTC438; [2003(4)JCR140(SC)]; JT2003(6)SC1; (2003)135

Advocate for Respondent : Chetan Sharma, Sr. Adv., ; R.D. Sharma and ; Ravindra Kumar

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. Leave granted.3. This appeal is filed against the judgment of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh delivered in Civil Revision No. 1688 of 2002 on 1.7.2002...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Apr 20 2005

Ms. Darika Bhatia Vs. Sh. V.L. Bhatia

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-20-2005

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 - Sections 3, 20 and 23; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20 - Order 7, Rule 11

Reported in : 119(2005)DLT518; I(2005)DMC823; 2005(82)DRJ25

Advocate for Respondent : Chetan Sharma, Sr. Adv. and ; Rajiv Nanda, Adv.

Pradeep Nandrajog, J.1. Present order disposes of defendant's application under Order 7 rule 11 CPC.2. It may be noted at the outset that though Order 7 Rule 11 CPC was invoked to non-suit the plaintiff on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Mar 28 2007

Living Media India Limited and anr. Vs. Office of the Chief Postmater ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-28-2007

Subject : Media and Communication

Acts : Indian Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 9

Reported in : 140(2007)DLT228; 2007(96)DRJ583

Advocate for Respondent : Chetan Sharma, Sr. Adv. and ; Akash Pratap, Adv. for the Respondent No. 1/UOI

Badar Durrez Ahmed, J.1. This writ petition is directed against the communication dated 08.11.2005 from the Department of Posts, Office of the Chief Postmaster General, Delhi Circle, New Delhi, whereby the petitioner was informed that the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

Try free for 7 days
  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales