Advanced Search Results
Awadhoot and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.
Mumbai
Apr-28-1977
CivilProperty
Constitution of India - Articles 226, 226(3), 227 and 245; Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 - Sections 2-A, 2-A(3), 2-A(4), 2-A(5), 2-A(6), 3(4), 21, 21(3), 21(3)(3), 33, 40, 40(3), 44-A, 44-B, 45(2) and 46; Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Rules, 1961 - Rule 3(3); Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) (Amendment) Rules, 1975 - Rule 3 and 3(3); Stannaries Act, 1869 - Sections 10; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 167 and 186; Land Revenue Code; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1958 - Sections 6
AIR1978Bom28; 1977MhLJ689
J.N. Chandurkar, Adv. in Spl. C.A. No. 524/1977, ;A.M. Gordey, Adv. in Spl. C.A. No. 417/1977, ;M.P. Badar and ;M.A. Garud, Asstt. Govt. Pleaders
Dharmdhkari, J.1. in Special Civil Application No. 417 of 1977 the petitioner, who is a tenure holder, hag filed a return before the Collector, which was subsequently forwarded to the Surplus Lands Determination Tribunal (hereinafter referred...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHansraj Veljee and anr. Vs. Maganlal Veljee and ors.
Mumbai
Jan-24-1979
Arbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 14, 14(2), 17 and 44 ; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 13; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 17, 17(1), 17(2) and 49; Arbitration Act, 1899 - Sections 11 and 11(2); Limitation Act; Arbitration Rules - Rules 1, 4, 4A, 7 and 12
AIR1980Bom237; 1979MhLJ530
J.N. Chandurkar, Adv.
ORDER1. This revision application has been filed against the findings which have been recorded by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Amravati in Special Civil Suit No. 20 of 1971 on certain issues which were treated...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMunicipal Council Morshi Vs. Tulsiram
Mumbai
Mar-10-1977
Civil
Maharashtra Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 65, 65(1), 80, 82, 86, 86-A, 86(1), 105, 106, 108, 109, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 119(1), 119(2), 120, 123, 145, 149, 150, 150(1), 151, 169, 170, 172, 332, 346(1); Bombay Provincial Municipalities Corporations Act - Sections 405 and 406; Road Traffic Act, 1930 - Sections 22; Motor Car Act, 1902 - Sections 6; Bombay District Municipal Act, 1901
AIR1978Bom92; 1977MhLJ735
J.N. Chandurkar, Adv.
Dharmadhikaki, J.1. These three Civil Revision Applications have been filed by the Municipal Council, Morshi, challenging the orders passed by the Sessions Judge. Amravati as well as the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Morshi, declaring the bills...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Manohar Son of Mukundrao Deshpande Vs. Menkabai (Smt.) Wife of Mukundr ...
Mumbai
Nov-23-1987
Family
Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 23; Hindu Woman's Right to Property Act, 1937 - Sections 3(3)
1988(2)BomCR242
J.N. Chandurkar, Adv.
A.A. Desai, J.1. This Letters Patent Appeal raises a question of substantial importance as to whether the right to claim partition of a dwelling house, accrued in favour of a Hindu widow under sub-section (3) of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSharad S/O Simon Sontakey Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.
Mumbai
Jan-10-1985
Constitution
Nagpur University Act, 1974 - Sections 24, 24(1) and 39
1986(2)BomCR662
A.A. Desai, A.G.P., for respondent Nos. 1, 2, and 4 and ;S.A. Bobde, Adv. for respondent No. 3 and ;S.K. Sanyal, Adv. for respondent No. 5
M.L. PENDSE, J.1. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is seeking to quash the order dated May 11, 1983 issued by respondent No. 3, Principal of the Hislop...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskZilla Parishad, Bhandara Vs. Agricultural Produce Marker Committee, Ti ...
Mumbai
Jun-27-1973
Constitution
Central Provinces and Berar Agricultural Produce Market Act, 1935 - Sections 3 and 4; Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulations) Act, 1963 - Sections 2(1), 3 and 4
AIR1974Bom128; 1974MhLJ378
V.A. Masodkar, ;M.P.M. Pillai, Advs. and ;M.M. Qazi, Addl. Govt. Pleader
Dharmadhikari, J.1. The petitioner, Zilla parishad, Bhandara, constituted under section 8 of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishad and panchayat Samitis Act, 1961 has filed this writ petition challenging the notification issued by the Director of Agricultural Marketing...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) Vs. Firm Keshavaji Vallabhdas
Mumbai
Aug-04-2005
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100
AIR2005Bom418; 2006(1)ALLMR194; 2006(1)BomCR462
A.W. Joshi, Adv. For respondent No. 1
ORDERS.T. Kharche, J. 1. Invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, this appeal takes an exception to the judgment dated 29-6-1989 and decree passed by the 10th Additional...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSubhash Vithalrao Gatlewar and ors. Vs. Dattatraya Keshavrao Shinde De ...
Mumbai
Aug-25-2004
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 99 - Order 41, Rule 31
2005(2)ALLMR757; 2005(1)MhLj43
A.B. Chaudhary, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 1(a) to 1(g)
A.H. Joshi, J.1. This second appeal is filed by unsuccessful defendants No. 3 to 8 who had succeeded in the Trial Court, however, failed in the first appellate Court.2. The plaintiff Dattatraya had filed a suit...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMrs. Indumati Bansilal Shah and 3 ors. Vs. Anant Girdharlal Shah and a ...
Gujarat
Oct-28-2005
Criminal
Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 10(1), 72, 118, 138, 139, 141 and 141(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 200, 202, 203, 204, 397, 399, 401 and 482; Constitution of India - Article 227; Criminal Law
(2006)2GLR1108
A.D. Oza, Public Prosecutor for Respondent No. 2
K.A. Puj, J.1. All these Cri. Misc. Applications are filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure invoking the inherent jurisdiction of this Court and praying for quashing and setting aside the Summons issued...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGirish @ Babalabhai S/O Champalal Vs. Shankarrao Kachruji Maiskar and ...
Mumbai Nagpur
Jul-29-2011
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227
Shri P.P. Kotwal, Adv.
1) Rule, made returnable forthwith. Heard finally with consent of Shri Chandurkar, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Shri Kotwal, learned Counsel for the respondent no.3. None appears for the respondent nos. 1 and 2 though...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »