Advanced Search Results
H.P. Abdul Khadar Vs. Hammad Beary and Others
Karnataka
Sep-08-1997
Property
Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 - Sections 2(2), 38(1) and 121-A; Karnataka Land Reforms Rules, 1974 - Rule 9-A(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115; Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1962 - Sections 121-A
ILR1998KAR889; 1998(1)KarLJ539
Sri K. Chandrashekhar, Adv. and ;Smt. K.R. Meena Kumari, High Court Government Pleader
ORDER1. This revision petition is filed by the owner to challenge the order dated 15-9-1989, in Appeal No. LRA/H/70/86-MAN, passed by the Land Reforms Appellate Authority, Mangalore. In passing the impugned order, the Appellate Authority while...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskN. Sreepadachar Vs. Vasantha Bai
Karnataka
Dec-03-1969
Family
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 10(1); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3; Mulla's Hindu Law;
AIR1970Kant232; AIR1970Mys232; ILR1969KAR690
K.S. Chandrashekhar, Adv.
Santhosh, J.1. This is an appeal filed by the husband against the order of the learned First Additional Civil Judge, Mysore, rejecting the petition filed by him for judicial separation under Section 10(1)(b) of the Hindu...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAnanth Engineering Works and anr. Vs. Karnataka Electricity Board (Kpt ...
Karnataka
Oct-07-2003
ConstitutionConsumer
Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 26, 49, 49(1) and 79; Karnataka Electricity Board Electricity (Supply) Regulations, 1988 - Regulations 9, 9.04(2), 9.4(2), 9.7 and 9.08; Indian Electricity Act - Sections 22; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19
2004(3)KarLJ337
M. Shivappa, Adv. for Respondents-1 and 2 in W.A. No. 3261 of 2001 and for Respondent-1 in W.A. Nos. 3262 and 3263 of 2001; ;S.M. Chandrashekar, Adv., W.A. Nos. 1301 for Respondent-1 and 2 in W.A. and
N.K. Jain, C.J.1.These intra-Court writ appeals arise out of the common order passed by the learned Single Judge dated 19-1-2001, in W.P. No. 24526 of 1996 and connected writ petitions. Common questions of fact and law...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Parayya Allayya Hittalamani Vs. Sri Parayya Gurulingayya Poojari and o ...
Supreme Court of India
Oct-12-2007
Civil
Evidence Act - Sections 92; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100
AIR2008SC241; 2008(1)AWC1078(SC); JT2007(12)SC352; 2008(1)KarLJ353; (2008)2MLJ504(SC); 2008(1)LHSC547; 2007AIRSCW6654
G.V. Chandrashekhar and ; Anjana Chandrasekhar, Advs.
S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. There is a temple in the village Terdal under the Jharkhandi Taluk in the State of Karnataka, commonly known as 'Sri Prabhudeva Temple'. Parties hereto are the hereditary poojaris of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited Vs. Sumitomo Heavy Industries ...
Mumbai
Nov-29-1999
Arbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 33; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 42, 43, 44-BB, 44-D, 115-A and 293-A; Oil and Natural Gas Commission Act, 1959;
2000(2)ALLMR195; 2000(2)BomCR501
Virendra Tulzapurkar, ;Virag Tulzapurkar, ;Kirti Munshi and ;Hitesh Jain, Advs. i/b. ;Udwadia, ;Udeshi & ;Berjis
ORDERD.K. DESHMUKH, J,1. This petition has been filed under the provisions of the Arbitration Act 1940 for setting aside the award dated 22nd June, 1995 made by the learned umpire Sir Michael Kerr. The respondent Sumitomo...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChandrashekhar Shankarrao Kulkarni Vs. the Rahul Shikshan Prasarak Man ...
Mumbai
Nov-23-2006
Property
Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 122 and 123; Indian Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 17; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 68; Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 - Sections 189; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 96, 100(5), 105 and 105(1) - Order 41, Rule 31
2007(3)BomCR181
M.V. Deshpande, Adv.
S.B. Deshmukh, J.1. Second Appeal No. 166 of 1986 is directed against the judgment and decree passed by learned III Additional District Judge, Aurangabad in Regular Civil Appeal (RCA) No. 49 of 1984. The appellant was...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Commissioner of Income Tax, M.P. and Nagpur Vs. Ganesh Rice Mills
Madhya Pradesh
Feb-11-1970
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 10(1); Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 256(1)
AIR1971MP48; [1970]77ITR889(MP); 1970MPLJ342
Y.S. Dharmadhikari, Adv.
Tare, J.1. This is a reference by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Bombay Bench 'A', under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, referring the following question of law for the opinion of this Court:--'Whether on the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAbhey Yograj Vs. State of Haryana and anr.
Punjab and Haryana
Mar-05-2004
CriminalCompany
Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 33; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 204 and 227
2004CriLJ2443
Sunil K. Vashisht, A.A.G.
ORDERSatish Kumar Mittal, J. 1. The petitioner, who was Just a Director in M/s. Ventech Industry Limited, Khazipally (V) Jinnaram Mandal Medak (AP) (hereinafter referred to as 'the accused company'), has filed this petition impugning the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri Udaysingh Gautam Jagtap Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.
Mumbai
Jun-12-2000
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 307; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 201 and 302
2001(5)BomCR71
D.N. Salvi, A.P.P. for the State/respondent No. 1, ;A.S. Rao, Adv. for respondent No. 2 and ;R.M. Agarwal, Adv. for respondent No. 3
Pratibha Upasani, J.1. This criminal revision application is filed by the petitioner/original accused No. 4/Udaysingh Gautam Jagtap, being aggrieved by the Judgment and Order dated 20th December, 1991, in Sessions Case No. 257 of 1991, passed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM. Yogendra and ors. Vs. Leelamma N. and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Jul-29-2009
Family
Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 6, 6(1) and 8; Evidence Act - Sections 35 and 50; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 5 and 11; Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 1976; Constitution of India - Article 136; Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005
2009(6)ALT8(SC); JT2009(15)SC99; 2009(11)SCALE166
S.N. Bhat, ; B. Subrahmanya Prasad, ; Ajay Kumar M. and
S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Interpretation of the application of the provisions of Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 [hereinafter called for the sake of brevity as `the Act'] vis-`-vis Section 6 thereof is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »