Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: chandrashekar rodnavar · Page 1 of about 17 results (0.027 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 07 2003

M. Basavaiah and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-07-2003

Subject : Property

Acts : Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 - Sections 48A; Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 - Sections 133; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 23

Reported in : ILR2003KAR1421; 2003(3)KarLJ189

Advocate for Respondent : Chandrashekar Rodnavar, High Court Government Pleader for Respondents-1 and 2, ;M.P. Geethadevi, Adv. for Respondent-3 and ;Madanmohan M. Kannur, Adv. for Respondent-4

M.S. Rajendra Prasad, J.1. These appeals filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act are directed against the order dated 6-12-2000 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition Nos. 20764 and 9972...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 16 2017

Sri P Malappa Vs. The Bengaluru Electricity Supply

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-16-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

1/24 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE16H DAY OF OCTOBER2017BEFORE THE HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI W.P.Nos.54502-506/2015 c/w W.P.No.55503/2015, W.P.Nos.50150/2015 & 12951/2016, W.P.Nos.59387/2016 & 5792-5793/2017 & W.P.No.22859/2013 (GM-KEB) IN W.P.Nos.54502-506/2015 BETWEEN:1. 2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 14 2003

Sanna Basappa Vs. the Assistant Commissioner and Land Acquisition Offi ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-14-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 23

Reported in : 2003(2)KarLJ22

Advocate for Respondent : Chandrashekar Rodnavar, High Court Government Pleader

M.F. Saldanha, J.1. We have heard the learned Counsels on both sides. What is principally submitted by the appellant's learned Counsel in this case is that this was an acquisition that pertained to 4 acres of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 03 2003

Sripathy Govind Bhat Vs. State of Karnataka, by Its Secretary, Revenue ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-03-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Karnataka Certain Inams Abolition Act, 1977

Reported in : ILR2003KAR4196

Advocate for Respondent : Chandrashekar Rodnavar, HCGP for R1 and R2 and ;Ravi G. Sabhahit, Adv. for R3

Saldanha, J.1. A rather interesting situation has arisen in this Writ Appeal wherein, the appellant before us who claims to be an Archaka performing the pooja in the Vinayak Dev Temple at Arasgud village and also...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 21 2003

Darga Estate Committee Vs. State of Karnataka by Secretary, Revenue De ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-21-2003

Subject : Property

Acts : Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 47, Rule 1

Reported in : ILR2003KAR1589; 2004(3)KarLJ363

Advocate for Respondent : Basava Prabhu S. Patil, Adv. for R3 to R37 and ;Chandrashekar Rodnavar, HCGP for R1 and R2

ORDERSaldanha, J. 1. We have heard the petitioner's learned Counsel in this group of review petitions which are effectively directed against the earlier Division Bench order dated 8.10.2001 allowing the entire set of writ appeals and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 04 2003

M. Nagaraj Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-04-2003

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesElection

Acts : Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 - Sections 29A and 29F; Karnataka Co-opeative Societies Rules, 1960 - Rule 14A

Reported in : 2003(3)KarLJ486

Advocate for Respondent : Chandrashekar Rodnavar, High Court Government Pleader, for Respondents-1 and 3, ;R.S. Ravi, Adv. for Respondent-2 and ;G.A. Vishwanath Reddy, Adv. for Respondent-4

1. We have heard the learned Counsels representing the parties and the learned Government Advocate on merits. A very limited relief has been sought in this appeal which is directed against an order passed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 2003

Mahadevappa Vs. Sadashivappa and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-06-2003

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5; Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 - Sections 49 and 51; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2003(4)KarLJ25

Advocate for Respondent : S.G. Kulkarni, Adv. for Respondent-1 and ;Chandrashekar Rodnavar, High Court Government Pleader for Respondents-2 and 3

1. We have heard the learned Counsels representing the contesting parties as also the learned Government Pleader for respondents 2 and 3 on merits.2. The interesting issue that has been rather vehemently debated in this appeal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 26 2002

Babu Madivala (Deceased) by L.Rs and ors. Vs. Kuddu Madivala and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-26-2002

Subject : Property

Acts : Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 - Sections 2(11), 2(12), 2(17), 24 and 48A(5)

Reported in : ILR2002KAR3417; 2002(3)KarLJ645

Advocate for Respondent : Chandrashekar Rodnavar, High Court Govt. Pleader, ;K. Radhesh Prabhu and ;N. Dinesh Rao, Advs.

ORDERN.S. Veerabhadraiah, J.1. The petitioners have questioned the order of the Land Reforms Appellate Authority, Udupi (Dakshina Kannada), passed in L.R.A. No. 1270 of 1988, dated 2/3-1-1989, modifying the order of the Land Tribunal to grant...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 01 2003

Kalyanappa Sanganabasappa Bagewadi (Deceased) by L.Rs Vs. State of Kar ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-01-2003

Subject : Property

Acts : Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 - Sections 48A(6)

Reported in : 2003(4)KarLJ315

Advocate for Respondent : Chandrashekar Rodnavar, High Court Government Pleader for Respondents-1 and 2, ;C.M. Desai, Adv. for ;B.B. Mandappa, Adv. for Respondents-4 and 6(a) and Respondents-3 and 5 abated

M.F. Saldanha, J.1. We have heard the learned Counsels representing the appellants, the Counsels representing the contesting respondents and the learned Government Advocate for respondents 1 and 2 on merits,2. This litigation has already gone through...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 26 2003

iraganteppa Ailas Veeragantappa Vs. Hanumanth and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-26-2003

Subject : CivilElection

Acts : Karnataka Panchayath Raj Act, 1983 - Sections 43A

Reported in : ILR2003KAR3035

Advocate for Respondent : F.V. Patil, Adv. for R1 and ;Chandrashekar Rodnavar HCGP for R2 to R4 and R5

Saldanha, J 1. We have heard the learned Counsel for the contesting parties as also the learned Government Advocate on merits. An interesting point of law has been canvassed in this Writ Appeal and it concerns...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial