Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: chandrasekhar · Page 1 of about 1,558 results (0.231 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 17 2008

U.R. Virupakshaiah Vs. Sarvamma and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-17-2008

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100; Hindu Law; Constitution of India - Articles 212(2) and 213

Reported in : AIR2009SC1481; 2009(1)AWC882(SC); ILR2009NULL1001; JT2009(1)SC244; 2009(4)KarLJ378; 2009(4)MhLJ337(SC); 2009(1)SCALE89:2009AIRSCW968:(1)LHSC342; 2009(3)KCCRSN89; 2009(4)KLJ378.

Advocate for Respondent : G.V. Chandrasekhar, ;

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Whether the High Court, while exercising its jurisdiction under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, could, while dictating the judgment, frame an additional question of law and allow the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 10 1963

K.V. Adinarayana Setty Vs. Commercial Tax Officer, Kolar Circle, Kolar

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-10-1963

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 9, 9(1), 9(3), 10A, 13, 13(1) and 13(2); Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 13, 13(1), 13(2), 13(3), and 29(1)

Reported in : ILR1963KAR561; [1963]14STC587(Kar)

Advocate for Respondent : D.M. Chandrasekhar, High Court Government Pleader

ORDERSadasivayya, J.1. The petitioners in this revision petition were the respondents in C.M.C. No. 44 of 1962 in the Court of the Second Magistrate, Kolar. In that case, viz., C.M.C. No. 44 of 1962, the petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 29 1962

A.R. Khaleel and Sons Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks in India

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-29-1962

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade Marks Act, 1940 - Sections 6(1), 14 and 76

Reported in : AIR1963Mys122

Advocate for Respondent : D.M. Chandrasekhar, Adv.

Sadasivayya, J.1. The facts and circumstances which have led to this appeal under Section 76 of the Trade Marks Act 1940, briefly stated, are as follows:An application dated 2-7-1958 was made to the Registrar of Trade...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 30 1962

Khaitan Minerals Vs. Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal for Mysore at Bangal ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-30-1962

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Mysore Sales Tax Act - Sections 27; Constitution of India - Article 286, 286(1) and 286(2)

Reported in : AIR1963Kant141; ILR1963KAR183; [1962]13STC508(Kar)

Advocate for Respondent : D.M. Chandrashekar, High Court Government Pleader

ORDERHegde, J.1. When these cases were posted on the board, they were not clubbed together for hearing. We happened to hear these revision petitions together under circumstances to be mentioned hereinafter. They raise common questions of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 05 1999

Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-05-1999

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 - Sections 5(1) and 6; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Sections 173(8)

Reported in : 1999(51)DRJ449

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Kirat N. Raval, Additional Solicitor General, ; Mr. A.D.N. Rao, ;

ORDER1. In this writ petition the petitioner inter-alia seeks the following reliefs: '(a) Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ quashing the investigation being conducted by CBI pursuance to Crime Case No.RC-12)5)/98/SIC.IV/ND registered with them...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 15 2005

Sou. Shevanta Vs. the State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-15-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 304A

Reported in : III(2005)ACC770; 2006ACJ2677; ILR2005KAR2867

Advocate for Respondent : Ravi B. Naik, Adv. for R.4 and ;M. Shivaprasad, Govt. Pleader for R1 and R2

Ajit J. Gunjal, J.1. An unfortunate lady underwent an operation of laparoscopic which has resulted in serious malady is in appeal. Her suit for claiming damages for medical negligence has been dismissed by the trial court...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 16 2004

P. Dhanavathi W/O. P. Narasimha Rao Vs. P. Radha Bai, Widow of P. Sund ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-16-2004

Subject : FamilyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 22, Rule 4; Civil Practice Rules - Rule 28

Reported in : 2004(6)ALT591

Advocate for Respondent : S. Ganesh Rao, Adv.

L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The petitioner filed O.S. No. 204 of 1990 in the Court of the III Senior Civil Judge, Secunderabad, for the relief of partition and separate possession, against her mother and brother, respondents...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 26 2003

Religious Endowments Department Vs. Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporatio ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-26-2003

Subject : Municipal Tax

Acts : Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 - Sections 685

Reported in : 2003(2)ALD707; 2003(4)ALT701

Advocate for Respondent : T.S. Venkata Ramana and K. Nageshwara Rao

P.S. Narayana, J.1. Heard Sri Metta Chandrasekhar Rao, Counsel representing the appellant and Sri T.S. Venkata Ramana, Counsel representing the espondent.2. The appellant in the Second Appeal is the Religious Endowments Department represented by the its...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 26 1989

Jonnala Venkatarami Reddy Vs. Siriveni Basivi Reddy and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-26-1989

Subject : ElectionCivil

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1964; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) ; Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Rules - Rule 22 and 22(8)(3); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1992(2)ALT203

Advocate for Respondent : S. Venkat Reddy, Adv. for ;T. Subrahmanyam, Adv. for the Respondent No. 1 and ;The Govt. Pleader for Co-op. for the Respondent Nos. 2 to 4

ORDERM.N. Rao, J.1. The petitioner Venkatarami Reddy, is seeking a writ of certiorari to quash the order passed by the fourth respondent, Election Tribunal (First Addl. District Munsif, Vijayawada) in O.P.No. 53/87 declaring the first respondent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 2002

Potluri Saraswathi Vs. Vallabhaneni Veerabhadra Rao

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-11-2002

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Hindu Law; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 91 and 92

Reported in : 2002(3)ALD690

Advocate for Respondent : M. Chandrasekhar Rao, Adv.

G. Bikshapathy, J.1. The appeal is filed against the judgment and decree passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Gudivada in OS No.169 of 1984, dated 21-11-1988 dismissing the suit.2. Appellant is the plaintiff. She filed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial