Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: chandra shekhar · Page 1 of about 853 results (0.114 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 18 2010

Keshav Kaushik Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Haryana and ors. Etc. Etc.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-18-2010

Subject : ConstitutionService

Permod Kohli, J.I. General1. District Judiciary is the foundation of the judicial system upon which the whole edifice of the judicial institutions stands. Judiciary is the bulwark of the democratic system in India and reckons indubitably...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 09 1990

Abdul Nasir Khan Vs. L. Hmingliana and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-09-1990

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1991)93BOMLR298; 1991CriLJ507

Advocate for Respondent : M.K. Patwardhan, Sr. Advocate and;A.S. Khan, Adv.

Kurdukar, J.1. This petition for a writ of habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed by the detenu (petitioner) challenging the legality and correctness of the detention order dated April 24,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 09 2001

Jamil Ahmad and ors. Vs. 5th Addl. Distt. Judge, Moradabad and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-09-2001

Subject : PropertyFamily

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960 - Sections 5 and 10(2); Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 169 and 171

Reported in : AIR2001SC3067; JT2001(8)SC444; 2001(7)SCALE143; (2001)8SCC599

Advocate for Respondent : Ex-parte

ORDER1. This appeal is from the order of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dated November 24, 1978 disposing of the Writ Petition No. 1054/78 filed by the appellants in terms of the order in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 31 1998

Chandra Shekhar Chaturvedi Vs. Smt. Rajesh Nandini Singh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-31-1998

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 33, 33(4), 36 and 36(8); Representation of the People Act, 1950 - Sections 23 and 127A; Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 - Rule 8

Reported in : AIR2000MP156

Advocate for Respondent : S.L. Saxena and ;M.L. Choubey, Advs.

ORDERR.S. Garg, J. 1. The present Election petition has been filed by the petitioner claiming himself to be a voter of Assembly constituency No. 83 Kotma to challenge the elections of the said constituency. 2. According...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 04 2008

Nathu Lal Sharma Vs. the Rajasthan State Cooperative Election Tribunal ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-04-2008

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Reported in : RLW2008(3)Raj2393

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Sandeep Mathur

Mohammad Rafiq, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.2. This writ petition has been filed challenging the judgment dated 25.8.2007 passed by Rajasthan State Cooperative Tribunal, Jaipur (for short-the Tribunal). The Tribunal by the said judgment...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 2007

Ravi Prakash Goel Vs. Chandra Prakash Goel and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-21-2007

Subject : ArbitrationContract

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2(1), 11, 21, 35 and 40; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 20; Indian Partnership Act - Sections 29, 46, 47 and 48; Limitation Act - Schedule - Article 5

Reported in : AIR2007SC1517; 2007(2)ARBLR1(SC); 2007(2)AWC1858(SC); 2007(4)CTC417; JT2007(4)SC523; 2007(4)SCALE562

Advocate for Respondent : Chandra Shekhar, ; Sanjay Kumar Tyagi and ; S.K. Verma, A

AR. Lakshmanan, J.1. Leave granted.2. The above appeal is directed against the final judgment and order dated 10.02.2006 passed by the Chief Justice of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Arbitration Application No. 7...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 07 2001

Catholic Diocese of Gorakhpur Education Society and anr. Vs. State of ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-07-2001

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 66

Reported in : AIR2001All196; (2001)1UPLBEC915

Advocate for Respondent : Chandra Shekhar Singh, S.C.

ORDER1. We have heard Sri AroopBanerjee, learned counsel for the petitionersand Sri Chandra Shekhar Singh, learnedAdditional Chief Standing Counsel for therespondent.2. In the instant writ petition the petitioners claim that it is a recognized educational institution...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 04 2004

Dhanpat Prasad Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Feb-04-2004

Subject : ContractConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 299

Advocate for Respondent : A.P. Jittu, S.C. II, Binod Kumar, J.C. to S.C. II, Chandra Shekhar, Sr. Adv. and Shant Kumar Sharma, Adv. for Respondent No. 3

Radha Mohan Prasad, J.1. In this writ petition, prayer is to quash letter No. Bhavarn, Moc(C)Yoj. VI-Vidhi-B-133/2001-1617(bha) Anu, dated 24-9-2001 (Annexure-9) by which the proposed construction of hundred bedded minority Hospital for boys at Nawada has...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 22 2000

Rajesh Talkies Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-22-2000

Subject : Commercial

Acts : U.P. Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1955 - Sections 10 and 13; U.P. Cinematograph Rules, 1954 - Rules 3, 8(2) and 44; Constitution of India - Article 226; U.P. Cinematograph Rules, 1951 - Rule 8(2)

Reported in : 2001(1)AWC375a

Advocate for Respondent : S.C., and ;Chandra Shekhar Singh, Adv.

R. K. Agrawal, J.1. The petitioner Rajesh Talkies, Kasba Sonbarsa, district Gorakhpur through its proprietor Shri Ram Shanker Prasad has filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 10 2002

Smt. Sarla Devi Vs. District Judge, Mainpuri and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-10-2002

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 22, Rule 5; Indian Succession Act - Sections 213

Reported in : 2002(3)AWC2000

Advocate for Respondent : Chandra Shekhar, Adv. and ;G.N. Verma, S.C.

S.N. Srivastava, J.1. Heard Sri Satya Prakash, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Chandra Shekhar, holding brief of Sri G. N. Verma, learned counsel for the respondent.2. A Suit No. 15 of 1975 was filed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial