Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: chandmal lodha · Page 1 of about 11 results (0.035 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 27 1987

Municipal Board of Abu Road Vs. Jaishiv and ors

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-27-1987

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Rajasthan Municipalities Act, 1959 - Sections 104(1); Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : AIR1988SC388; JT1987(4)SC176; 1987(2)SCALE832; 1987(Supp)SCC301; [1988]1SCR584; [1988]68STC356(SC)

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal Nos. 2255-56 of 1979.From the Judgment and order dated 20.12.1978 of the Rajasthan High Court in Special Appeal Nos. 40 and 39 of196.V.M. Tarkunde, Tapas C. Ray, Chandmal Lodha, S.K. Jain,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 02 1959

Thanmal Surana and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-02-1959

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3, 3(2), 3(3), 3(3A), 3(5) and 5; Constitution of India - Articles 19, 19(1), 19(5), 19(6), 31(2), 105 and 245; Gram (Rajasthan) Price Control Order, 1958

Reported in : AIR1959Raj206

Advocate for Respondent : Achruram, Adv. for Respondent No. 1 and; L.N. Chhangani, Govt. Adv. for Respondent No. 2

Sarjoo Prosad, C.J.1. These petitions for writs have been presented by certain commission agents and grain merchants of Ganganagar District. The common question raised in these applications is the constitutional validity of Sections 3 and 5...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 22 1960

Dashrat and ors. Vs. the State

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-22-1960

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1961CriLJ403

ORDERL.N. Chhangani, J.1. This is a reference by the Sessions Judge, Merta recommending that the order of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Parbatsar dated 26-6-58, purporting to have been passed under Section 137 Cr. P.C. should be set...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 14 1962

Balmukand and anr. Vs. Jagan Nath

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Dec-14-1962

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 34; Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 45(2), 46 and 54

Reported in : AIR1963Raj212

Advocate for Respondent : Chandmal Lodha and; Kishore Singh Lodha, Advs.

I.N. Modi, J. 1. This is a plaintiffs' second appeal against the judgment and decree of the District Judge, Ganganagar dated the nth July, 1957, affirming the judgment and decree of theCivil Judge Suratgarh dated the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 02 1990

Gazi Khan Alias; Chotia Vs. State of Rajasthan and Another

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-02-1990

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21, 22(5) and 166; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860; Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988 - Sections 3(1); Customs Act - Sections 108; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25

Reported in : AIR1990SC1361; 1990CriLJ1420; 1990(2)Crimes482(SC); 1990(29)ECC5; JT1990(3)SC28; 1990(1)SCALE869; (1990)3SCC459; [1990]2SCR831; 1990(1)WLN289

Advocate for Respondent : Chandmal Lodha, ; S.C. Gupta (N.P.), ; M.N. Shroff, ;

ORDER1. This appeal by grant of special leave is directed against the Order of the High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur in Habeas Corpus Petition No. 2866/1989 dismissing the Writ Petition filed by the detenu Gazi...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 08 1960

Chimanlal Dalchand and ors. Vs. Maharajadhiraj H.H. Shri Sumersinghji ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-08-1960

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Transfar of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 105, 107 and 108

Reported in : AIR1961Raj17

Advocate for Respondent : B.K. Acharya Adv. for Respondent No. 1 and; Chandmal Lodha, Adv. for Respondent No.2

Sarjoo Prosad, C. J. This appeal is by defendants Nos. 1, 2 and 3, and arises out of a suit for recovery of rent instituted by the plaintiff respondent No. 1 in respect of a lease...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 22 1965

S. Ghosh and ors. Vs. Dulia and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-22-1965

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Payment of Wages Act, 1936 - Sections 7; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act

Reported in : AIR1967Raj145; (1969)ILLJ194Raj

Advocate for Respondent : Chandmal Lodha, Adv.

Kan Singh, J. 1. These are four writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution filed by Shri S. Ghosh, Mines Manager, Bikaner Gypsums Limited. Jamsar (Bikaner), challenging the validity of the order of the Sub...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 14 1964

M.P. Indra and Co. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-14-1964

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 20(1) and 226; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 28, 246, 256, 271, 274 and 297(2); Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 22(2)

Reported in : AIR1965Raj104

Advocate for Respondent : Chandmal Lodha, Adv.

Kan Singh, J. 1. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution by which the validity of a notice, issued by the Income-tax Officer A Ward, Jodhpur, on 19-4-1963 under Section 274 read...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 31 1962

The State Vs. Banshilal Luhadia and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-31-1962

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 166; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 6; Rajasthan District Boards Act, 1954 - Sections 94 and 203; Jaipur District Boards Act, 1947 - Sections 57; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 21

Reported in : AIR1962Raj250

Advocate for Respondent : Chandmal Lodha, Adv. for; Luhadia and; S.K. Goyal, A

Modi, J.1. We have four criminal matters, one appeal and three revisions, all of which have been filed by the State and arise out of similar facts. The appeal arises out of the judgment dated the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 09 1956

Dungardas and anr. Vs. Custodian Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-09-1956

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1956Raj163

Advocate for Respondent : Chandmal Lodha and; Balkishan Pareek, Advs.

Wanchoo, C.J.1. This is an application by Dungardas and another under Article 226 of the Constitution against the Custodian Evacuee Property, Rajasthan, and the Deputy Custodian Evacuee Property, Ganganagar.2. Dungardas's case briefly was that certain proceedings...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial