Advanced Search Results

Ramkumar Chunilal Agarwala and ors. Vs. Hazarimal Bansilal Kumbhar and ...

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 24, 38 and 41

Reported in : AIR1961Raj157

Advocate for Respondent : Krishna Mal Lodha, Adv. for Hazari Mal and; Chand Mal Lodha, Adv. for Hansraj and others

Sarjoo Prosad, C.J.1. These are connected cases and arise out of the same set of facts and circumstances. They can be, therefore, conveniently disposed of by this judgment.2. On the 8th of September, 1952, Ram Kumar,...

Sunder Rai and ors. Vs. Tarachand and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 73 - Order 21, Rules 2, 11 and 11(2); Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 182

Reported in : AIR1962Raj161

Advocate for Respondent : Chand Mal Lodha, Adv.

Ranawat, J.1. This is a civil execution first appeal by Jeevraj judgment-debtor from an order of the senior Civil Judge, Jalore, dated the 1st of September, 1956, dismissing an objection petition filed by the appellant and...

Uttam Gulabrao Sakhare Vs. Champatrao Gulabrao Gawande

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 1, Rule 10; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 116

Reported in : (1958)60BOMLR1150

Advocate for Respondent : V.M. Kulkarni, Adv.

(1) This is a defendatns second appeal from a suit for possession instituted by the plaintiff who calims to be the defendants's landlord andfor recovery of arrears of rent.(2) The house in question is situated at...

Kastoor Chand Vs. Sarkar

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Rajasthan Public Security Ordinance - Sections 3, 5 and 64; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 491

Reported in : AIR1950Raj40

Advocate for Respondent : Mansha Ram, Govt. Adv.; Chand Mal, amicus curiae

ORDER1. This application is made by KasturChand Jain, resident of Rajnandgaon, situate in Central Provinces under Section 491, Criminal P. C., against the order of detention to the Government of United State of Rajasthan. This order...

Seth Ramrichhpal Sirya Vs. Ajmer Traders

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 14, 15, 16 17 and 30; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 158

Reported in : AIR1963Raj87

Advocate for Respondent : Chand Mal Lodha, Adv.

Chhangani, J. 1. The appellant Seth Ramrichhpal Sirya, on behalf of himself and as manager and karta of the joint Hindu family known as Tilokchand Dilsukhrai, resident of AJmer, has filed this appeal under Section 39...

H.H. Brij Indar Singh Vs. Lala Kanshi Ram

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Limitation

Reported in : (1917)19BOMLR866

Dunedin, J.1. The facts out of which this case arises are very clearly and succinctly stated by Mr. Justice John stone in his judgment of the 6th April, 1909, which is part of the necessary history...

Bai Chandan Vs. Chhotalal Jekisondas

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1932Bom584; (1932)34BOMLR1273; 140Ind.Cas.381

Rangnekar, J.1. The petitioner filed an application in the Court of the Third Joint Subordinate Judge at Ahmedabad for leave to sue in forma pauperis. The learned Judge issued a notice to the opponent and also...

Ashok Kumar and anr. Vs. the State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : CriminalBanking

Reported in : 1994(1)WLN686

B.R. Arora, J.1. These three miscellaneous petitions raise a common question of fact and the law and, therefore, they are being disposed of by this common judgment.2. The petitioners were tried by the learned Additional Sessions...

MoldIn @ Moliya Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : RLW2007(1)Raj43

Khem Chand Sharma, J.1. This criminal appeal under Section 374 Cr.P.C. arises out of the judgment dated 31.7.2002 passed by the learned sessions Judge, Jaipur City, Jaipur whereby the learned Sessions Judge has convicted the appellant...

Dalpat Singh and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 334 and 379

Reported in : 2005CriLJ749; RLW2005(1)Raj153; 2004(4)WLC613

Advocate for Respondent : V.R. Mehta, Public Prosecutor

Sunil Kumar Garg, J. 1. The abovementioned two appeals are being decided by this common judgment and order as both arise out of the same judgment and order dated 6.7.2002 passed by the learned Additional Sessions...