Advanced Search Results
Emperor Vs. Morarji Jivraj
Mumbai
Oct-03-1934
Criminal
(1934)36BOMLR1213
Sen, J.1. The facts out of which the present application arises are as follows. Opponent No. 1, who is the widow of one Narsi Sawal, was the complainant against the petitioner and opponent No. 2 whom...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR.C. Pollard Vs. Satya Gopal Mazumdar
Kolkata
Aug-24-1943
Criminal
AIR1943Cal594
Derbyshire, C.J.1. On 25th May 1948 this Court issued a rule upon the District Magistrate of Murshidabad and upon the complainant to show cause why the conviction of the accused Pollard under Section 355, Penal Code...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBadridas Agarwalla Vs. Sohan Lal Oswal and anr.
Kolkata
Jan-17-1940
Criminal
AIR1940Cal545
Khundkar, J.1. This is a reference under Section 438, Criminal P.C., by the learned Sessions Judge of the Assam Valley Districts in which he recommends that a part of an order passed by a trying Magistrate...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Emperor Vs. Shankarshet Ramshet Uravane
Mumbai
Aug-16-1933
Criminal
(1933)35BOMLR1040; 147Ind.Cas.25
John Beaumont, Kt., C.J.1. These are applications in revision in which the two accused ask us to interfere with their conviction under Section 201 of the Indian Penal Code, that is to say, for concealing evidence...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBishnu Pada Chatterjee and ors. Vs. Emperor
Kolkata
Feb-08-1944
Criminal
AIR1945Cal441
Edgley, J.1. The appellants in these appeals are Bishnupada Chatterji alias Makra, Paresh Nath Kalwar, Ganendra Nath Das and Biswanath Lala alias Bombaiya. They were placed on their trial before Mr. S.N. Mukherjee, Presidency Magistrate, Calcutta,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNabi Rasool and ors. Vs. Emperor
Kolkata
Mar-12-1942
Criminal
AIR1943Cal32
Lodge, J.1. This is an appeal against convictions and sentences under Section 395, I.P.C. The four appellants were placed on their trial before the Sessions Judge of Hughly on a charge of dacoity, the allegation being...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.H. Bhattacharjee and ors. Vs. Emperor
Kolkata
May-23-1944
Criminal
AIR1944Cal374
Lodge, J.1. The two petitioners were tried by the Additional Chief Presidency Magistrate of Calcutta and were convicted of the offence of bribery. Petitioner 1, K. H. Bhattacharjee was sentenced under Section 161, Penal Code, to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAbdul Gafur Kotwal and anr. Vs. Emperor
Kolkata
Aug-23-1937
Criminal
AIR1938Cal658
Guha, J. 1. The judgment going to be delivered by my learned brother in this case has been read and considered by me carefully; and I have not thought it necessary or proper to record a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSuperintendent and Remembrancer of Legal Affairs Vs. Golok Tikadar and ...
Kolkata
Mar-24-1942
Criminal
AIR1944Cal234
Lodge, J.1. This appeal has been presented in accordance with the provisions of Section 417, Criminal P.C. by the Legal Remembrancer to the Government of Bengal. 58 persons were placed on trial before the Additional Sessions...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRash Behari Shaw (Handa) and ors. Vs. Emperor
Kolkata
Jul-10-1936
Criminal
AIR1936Cal753
1. The appellants in these appeals are Rash Behari Shaw, Sushil Kumar Ghose, Patal Chandra Santra, Jagadish Singh, Manindra Nath Dey, Babulal Chowkhani, Ganesh Bahadur and Sailendra Nath Mukherji. They together with four other persons, Panchkari...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »