Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: c v subba rao · Page 1 of about 97 results (0.210 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 06 1989

Testeels Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-06-1989

Subject : Contract

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1989SC857; 1989(40)ELT222(SC); (1989)2GLR766; JT1989(1)SC204; 1989(1)SCALE273; (1989)2SCC274; [1989]1SCR502; 1989(1)LC555(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : A. Subba Rao, ; C.V. Subba Rao and ; Sushma Suri, Advs.

K.N. Saikia, J.1. This appeal by special leave is from the judgment of the High Court of Gujarat in Special Civil Application No. 1294 of 1977 under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.2. The Government...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 07 1989

D.V. Haridev Vs. B. Narayanamurthy

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-07-1989

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961 - Sections 21(1), 27 and 28, Rule 28

Reported in : ILR1990KAR346; 1990(1)KarLJ138

Advocate for Respondent : C.V. Subba Rao for R-1(c) and (d) and ;G.P. Shivaprakash, Adv. for R-2

ORDERHakeem, J. 1. These Revision Petitions arise out of the order passed by the trial Court on an application under Section 28(1)(b) of the Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961 (the Act) directing the landlord to put...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 01 1987

Rai Bahadur Seth Shreeram Durgaprasad Vs. Director of Enforcement

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-01-1987

Subject : FERA

Acts : Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 - Sections 12, 23(1) and 23-C

Reported in : AIR1987SC1364; 1987CriLJ1123; 1987(13)ECC253; 1987(12)ECR423(SC); JT1987(2)SC590; 1987(1)SCALE1081; (1987)3SCC27; [1987]3SCR137; 1987(2)UJ357(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : M.S. Rao, ; A.S. Rao and ; C.V. Subba Rao, Advs.

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal No. 627 of 1986.From the Judgment and Order dated 7.3. 1986 of the Bombay High Court in Crl. Appeal No. 119 of 1981. Ashok Sen, Kapil Sibbal, A.K. Sanghi and R.L....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 16 1993

Union of India Vs. Kolluni Ramaiah and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-16-1993

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 142; Requisitioniong and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952 - Sections 8(3); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 41, Rule 22

Reported in : AIR1994SC1149; JT1993(6)SC465; 1993(4)SCALE463; (1994)1SCC367; [1993]Supp3SCR694; 1994(1)LC97(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : Vimal Dave and ; Subba Rao, Advs.

ORDERS. Mohan, J.1. Delay condoned. Permission to prefer Special Leave Petitions granted.2. Leave granted.3. The fact leading to these appeals are as under :4. An extent of 6.50 acres of land in village Marripalam Taluk and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 1988

S. Bheemappa and anr. Vs. the Returning Officer for Election to Indian ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-22-1988

Subject : ElectionConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 329; Medical Council Act, 1956 - Sections 4(2) and 32; ; Medical Council Rules, 1957 - Rules 10 and 25

Reported in : AIR1989Kant75; ILR1988KAR1726; 1988(1)KarLJ513

Advocate for Respondent : Shivaraj Patil, ;Aswathanarayan, ;Ravivarmakumar, ;H.N. Narayan and ;H.K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advs.

ORDER1. In this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioners have sought for the following reliefs :'a) That the Hon'ble Court be pleased to quash the Annexures-A and B and the entire proceedings of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 21 2000

M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-21-2000

Subject : Environment

Reported in : 2000(8)SCALE395; (2002)10SCC664

ORDERM. Jagannadha Rao and M.B. Shah, JJ.I.A. Nos. 98 and 1131. Issue notice.2. Learned Counsel Mr. C.V. Subba Rao accepts notice on behalf of Union of India.3. Learned Solicitor General seeks and is granted four weeks'...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 19 1973

R.R. Diwakar and ors. Vs. V.B. Guttal

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-19-1973

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1975CriLJ90

ORDERSanthosh, J.1. The petitioners before this Court are Al, A2 and A3 respectively in the Court of the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Fourth Court. Bangalore, in C.C. No. 396 of 1973. A private complaint was filed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 19 2002

A.K. Subbaiah Vs. Karnataka State Bar Council and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-19-2002

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 35 and 35(1)

Reported in : AIR2002Kant410; ILR2002KAR3918; 2003(4)KarLJ219

ORDERH.L. Dattu, J.1. A complaint filed by one Sri J. Gopal son of late Sri Jatappa under Section 35 of Advocates Act, 1961, against the petitioner before the Karnataka State Bar Council is referred to the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 13 1987

Ram Kumar Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-13-1987

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 129, 131, 132, 197, 197(2), 197(3) and 197(4)

Reported in : AIR1987SC735; 1987CriLJ703; JT1987(1)SC157; 1987(1)SCALE58; (1987)1SCC476; [1987]1SCR991; 1987(1)LC351(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : M.S Gujral, ; C.V. Subba Rao and ; Kailash Mehta, Advs.

M.P. Thakkar, J.1. Can a sanction to PROSECUTE surrogate for a sanction to take COGNIZANCE? 2. Two safeguards are provided in regard to prosecution of members of the Armed Forces or of the forces charged with...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 09 1998

Smt. Lakshamma Vs. M.P. Krishnappa and Others

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-09-1998

Subject : Property

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 36

Reported in : 1999(1)KarLJ536

Advocate for Respondent : Smt. Padma for ;Sri C.V. Subba Rao, Adv.

1. The first plaintiff is the appellant and second plaintiff is made one of the respondents. The suit for injunction in respect of the vacant site measuring 30' x 30' at Muthkur Village, Hoskote Taluk, Bangalore...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial