Advanced Search Results

K. Veeresh Babu and Etc. Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 21(1), 85A and 129; Karnataka Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 - Rule 230; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 21, 25(1) and 245 ; Karnataka Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Rules 1993; Andhra Pradesh Motor Vehicles Rules, Rule 498A; Hyderabad City Police Act - Sections 21(1)

Reported in : AIR1994Kant56; ILR1993KAR2939; 1993(4)KarLJ769

Advocate for Respondent : Sylendra kumar and ;Smt. P. Jayalakshmi, C.G.S.C., ;C.V. Kumar, Govt. Pleader

ORDER1. Reliefs sought for by each of the petitipetitioners in the following writ petitions are as detailed below.W.P. No. 17519/89(a) Writ in the nature of certiorari declaring that the impugned Rule 230 of the Karnataka Motor...

Ashok Gramodyoga Sahakara Sangha Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Commercial T ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 20, 20(5) and 22

Reported in : [1993]90STC491(Kar)

Advocate for Respondent : C.V. Kumar, HCGP

K. Shivashankar Bhat, J. 1. These revision petitions pertain to the assessment years 1978-79 and 1979-80 (for the year ending 30th June). The assessee purchased paddy and sold hand pounded rice. The question pertains to the...

Narayani Rao Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes in Karnataka, Bangal ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 21, 21(2) and 23

Reported in : ILR1994KAR506

Advocate for Respondent : C.V. Kumar, High Court Government Pleader

Shivaraj Patil, J.1. This civil revision petition is filed under section 23 of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 (for short 'the Act') to revise the order dated April 29, 1988, passed by the Karnataka Appellate...

Sree Gajanana Motor Transport Co. Ltd. Vs. the Karnataka State Transpo ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 89; Karnataka Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 - Rule 88; Limitation Act - Sections 5

Reported in : AIR2003Kant326; 2004(2)KarLJ87

Advocate for Respondent : C.V. Kumar and ;S.V. Krishnaswamy, Advs.

S. R. Nayak, J. 1. This Writ Appeal is directed against the order of a learned single Judge of this Court dated 13-10-2000 in Writ Petition No. 23379 of 2000. The appellant is the writ petitioner....

Anitha Cashew Industries Vs. Commercial Tax Officer, Ii Circle, Udupi ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 5, 6 and 8A

Reported in : 1993(43)ECC156; [1993]90STC163(Kar)

Advocate for Respondent : C.V. Kumar, HCGP

S.R. Rajasekhara Murthy, J. 1. The petitioner is engaged in the business of converting raw cashew into cashew kernel. The petitioner purchases raw cashew nuts from unregistered dealers for his business. The petitioner's manufacturing unit is...

R. Rama Reddy Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Karnataka Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 - Rule 151 and 151(3); Karnataka Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 2(35)

Reported in : ILR1992KAR3421; 1992(4)KarLJ266

Advocate for Respondent : C.V. Kumar, HCGP

ORDERShivaraj Patil, J.1. In brief, the facts leading to this Writ Petition are:The petitioner holds an Inter-State stage carriage permit on the route Bangalore to Coimbatore and back to operate with two vehicles during night hours....

Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation, Bangalore Vs. Regional Tra ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 47(3), 57, 70, 71, 72, 80(2) and 90

Reported in : 2000(3)KarLJ652

Advocate for Respondent : Sri B.H. Satish, High Court Govt. Pleader and ;Sri C.V. Kumar, Adv.

ORDER1. This petition is filed by the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation aggrieved by the order of the Karnataka State Transport Appellate Tribunal in Revision Petition No. 1353 of 1999, dated 19-11-1999.2. Facts: The petitioner sought...

Bharat Kumar Vs. Karnataka State Transport Appellate Tribunal

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 59, 72, 72(2) and 74; Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 - Rule 82 and 82(2)

Reported in : ILR1993KAR3591

Advocate for Respondent : C.V. Kumar, HCGP

ORDERRaveendran, J. 1. The petitioner applied for grant of a stage carriage permit on 31.3.1992 under Section 70 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). The second respondent (Regional Transport Authority,...

Smt. Shalini JaIn W/O Rathnakar Jain, Proprietor, JaIn Travels Vs. the ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Karnataka Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 80, 80(2), 89, 89(1) and 89(2); Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 12, 18 and 18(2); Madras Boundary Act - Sections 25; Indian Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 73(1) and 77(1); Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 2, 2(1), 2(3), 4 to 24 and 29(2); Karnataka Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989 - Rules 88 and 89; Punjab and Haryana Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 - Rule 85

Advocate for Respondent : A.R. Shardamba, Adv. for R1 in W.A. Nos. 3848-3853/2009, ;B.R.S. Gupta, Adv. for R2 in W.A. Nos. 3848-3853/2009, ;C.V. Kumar, Adv. for R3 in W.A. Nos. 3848-3853/2009, ;A.S. Parashara Kumar, Adv. for R

V. Gopala Gowda, J.1. These appeals are filed by the appellant-permit holder aggrieved by the impugned order dated 8-10-2009 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P. Nos. 28713-28718/2009 in whose favour the Karnataka State Transport...

Smt. Sulochana Damodhar W/O Sri. Damodhar Vs. the State Transport Auth ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 63; Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 1988 - Sections 58, 70, 71, 72, 76, 80, 80(3), 81, 87, 88, 88(1), 88(4), 88(5), 88(6), 90, 217A and 217(1); Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 2000; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 2009(3)KarLJ409; 2009(4)KCCR2479; 2009(2)AIRKarR506(D.B);

Advocate for Respondent : C.V. Kumar, Adv. for C/R3, ;K.V. Prabhakaran, Adv. for R2 and R4, ;M.C. Narasimhan Associates for R4 and ;C.S. Patil, Adv. for R5 and R6 in W.A. No. 840/2007 and ;K.V. Prashakaran, Adv. for C/R2 and R

Venugopala Gowda, J.1. Appellant in W.A. No. 840/07 was the petitioner in W.P. No. 16305/05. Respondents 1 to 4 were the original respondents. Respondents 5 and 6 are the impleaded respondents. Writ petition filed by the...