Advanced Search Results

Suraj C Goyal vs the District Collector, Chennai

Court : Chennai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 06-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Suraj C Goyal ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The District Collector, ChennaiCum Appellate Authority Under The Maintenance And Welfare Of Parents And Senior Citizens Act,...

Madura Coats Pvt. Ltd., Vs Union of India

Court : Chennai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.10.2025CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and M.P.No.2 of 2025 Madura Coats Pvt. Ltd., (Coats India Division), Rep.by its Manager-Excise & Legal, No.37-A, Velacherry Main Road, Opposite Vijaynagar Bus...

M/S.Sanjay a.Wadhwa,HUF-II, vs 1.M/S.Sri Siranjivee Films,

Court : Chennai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 29.01.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE M/s.Sanjay A.Wadwa, HUF II, 708, Shivalya 'A' Block, 198, Ethiraj Salai, Egmore, Chennai - 105. ... Plaintiff Vs. 1.M/s.Sri Siranjivee Films,...

Cce Vs. Vikram Industries

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2004)(97)ECC588

1. This appeal filed by the Revenue is directed against the Order-in-Appeal No. 41/2000 (CBE) (MJ) dated 11.5.2000 passed by the Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise (Appeals) Trichy, by which the Commissioner has allowed the...

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Dalmia Cements (P) Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2000)LC340Tri(Chennai)

1. This is a Revenue appeal against Order-in-Appeal No. 106/97 (T), dated 19-9-1997 passed by Commissioner (Appeals) wherein he has allowed modvat credit to the present respondents on 12 items and disallowed the same on one...

The Managing Dirctor and vs the Joint Commissioner of Labour

Court : Chennai

2026:MHC:975IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 19-02-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.No.20688 of 2023, W.P.No.20691 OF 2023 & W.M.P.No.20045 of 2023, W.M.P.No.20048 OF 2023 W.P.No.20688 of 2023 The Managing Director And Chief Executive Officer,...

The Regional Director, Esi Corporation Vs. Chemfab Alkalis Limited (Pu ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Insurance

Acts : Employees' State Insurance Act - Sections 82

Reported in : 2004(2)CTC326; (2004)IILLJ577Mad

Advocate for Respondent : C. Seethapathy, Adv. for ;P.S. Raman, Adv.

S.R. Singharavelu, J. 1. The substantial questions of law that arise for consideration is this appeal are as follows :'i. Whether the reliance of the lower Court on Section 2(12) of the Employees' State Insurance Act...

M.Velayudham Vs. Presiding Officer and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act - Section 11A; Constitution of India - Article 226

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.C.Seethapathy, Adv.

1. The petitioner, a former employee of the second respondent bank, has filed this writ petition, challenging the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, the first respondent herein in I.D.No.20 of 2006,...

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35H

Reported in : 2005(2)CTC466

Advocate for Respondent : C. Seethapathy, Adv. (R2)

ORDERMarkandey Katju, C.J.1. This reference application seeks direction to the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (in short CEGAT) to refer to this Court the following question of law:Whether the Hon'ble Tribunal was correct in...

Ammaiappan Vs. General Manager, Canara Bank and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and IndustrialBankingCriminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 420, 468 and 471; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13(1) and 13(2); Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : (2009)ILLJ847Mad

Advocate for Respondent : N. Chandrasekaran, Adv. (for CBI) takes notice ;C. Seethapathy, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3

ORDERP. Jyothimani, J.1. Heard the learned Counsel on either side. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.2. This writ petition is filed challenging the charge memo issued against the petitioner dated...