Advanced Search Results
V. Anil Reddy, Represented by the Power of Attorney Holder B. Bavadeep ...
Karnataka
May-25-2017
Land Acquisition
Sri. B.N. Suresh Babu, Sri. Nishanth.A.V, Sri. S.R. Krishna Kumar
(Prayer: This MFA is filed under Order 43 Rule 1(R) of CPC, against the Order Dated:17.02.2016 passed on IA No.1 and 2 in O.S No.66/2016 on the file of the III Additional City Civil and Sessions...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri.Aralumalligappa, S/O Channappa, and ors. Vs. the State of Karnatak ...
Karnataka
Jan-28-2011
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 457, 380
SRI.G.M.SRINIVASA REDDY, Adv.
1. Heard Sri. C.S. Hiremath, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. Perused the judgment of the Courts below.2) The petitioners were Accused Nos. 1 & 2 in C.C. No. 170/2004 on the file of the Civil...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDeshaiah Vs. Chinnaswamy and Others
Karnataka
Oct-20-1995
Property
Karnataka Village Offices Abolition Act, 1961 - Sections 2(1), 4, 5, 6 , 7 and 10
AIR1996Kant164; ILR1995KAR3465; 1995(5)KarLJ402
Padubidri Raghavendra Rao, ;C.S. Hiremath and ;M.R. Rajagopal, Advs.
ORDER1. This revision under Section 115, CPC is directed against the Judgment of the District Judge, Mandya, dismissing the petitioner's appeal for re-grant of Thoti Service Land measuring 5 acres 19 guntas in Sy. No. 131...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Smt. Parvati Vs. Hallur Halappa
Karnataka
Nov-17-1997
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110D
1999ACJ705; ILR1998KAR1374
C.S. Hiremath, Adv. R-5 by B.C. Seetharama Rao, Adv. R-2 by B.V. Acharya, Adv.
Ashok Bhan, J.1. These two appeals arise out of the same judgment and award and are therefore disposed of by a common order. M.F.A.1926/85 is by the claimants who are aggrieved by the inadequacy of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Parvati @ Baby and ors. Vs. Hollur Hallappa and ors.
Karnataka
Jun-26-1997
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110D
I(1998)ACC689; 1999ACJ344; [1998(79)FLR716]; ILR1997KAR2376
C.S. Hiremath for R-1, ;B. Seetharama Rao, Adv. for A.N. Venkatesh, Adv. for R-2 in MFA. 1926/85, ;Jayakumar S. Patil, Adv. for R-1, ;M.U. Roonacha, Adv. for R-7, ;C.S. Hiremath, Adv. for R-5 and ;B.
R.V. Raveendran, J.1. The following questions are referred by a Division Bench of this Court for consideration:-(1) Whether the family pension is liable to be deducted out of the compensation determined in the case? (2) Whether...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChandrappa Vs. Assistant Commissioner, Basava Kalyan Sub-division, Dis ...
Karnataka
Jul-02-1997
Property
Writ Proceedings Rules, 1977 - Rule 39; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 47, Rule 1; Constitution of India - Article 226; Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 - Sections 39
1998(1)KarLJ694
Sri S.N. Aswathanarayana, Government Adv., ;Sri B.C. Mandappa and ;Sri C.S. Hiremath, Advs.
ORDER1. This petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with a prayer to the effect that this Court may be pleased to quash the impugned order dated 24-8-1984 in Writ Petition...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. D. Vasantha Kamala W/O Sri V. Bhasker Vs. State of Karnataka by I ...
Karnataka
Nov-17-2006
Service
Karnataka Civil Services (General Recruitment Rules), 1977 - Rule 8; Karnataka Government Servants (Seniority) Rules, 1957 - Rule 4 and 4A; Government Order, 1997; Constitution (Seventy Seventh Amendment) Act, 1995; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16(1), 16(4), 16(4A) and 309
2007(4)KarLJ78; 2007(1)AIRKarR233
S.Z.A. Khureshi, Govt. Adv. for Respondents 1 to 3 and ;C.S. Hiremath, Adv. for Respondent No. 4
ORDERAnand Byrareddy, J.1. The facts of the case are: The fourth respondent society is said to be managing two Grant-in-Aid Institutions, namely Smt. Gangamma Hombegowda Girls' High School and Hombegowda Boys' High School. The petitioner had...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDandappa Rudrappa Hampali and Others Vs. Renukappa Alias Revanappa and ...
Karnataka
Dec-11-1992
Family
Hindu Law
AIR1993Kant148; ILR1993KAR1182; 1993(1)KarLJ138
R.H. Chandangouder and ;C.S. Hiremath, Advs.
ORDERShivashankar Bhat, J.1. This appeal is by defendants 1 to 8 and 17. The first respondent is the plaintiff. The suit is one for partition on the ground that all the properties described in the schedule...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›