Advanced Search Results

Harjeev Aggarwal Vs. Joint Cit

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)89TTJ(Del)187

ORDERV. Dongzathang, P:These cross-appeals are directed against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals), dated 13-2-2002.2. The facts are that a search was conducted on a specific information received from the Investigation Wing that a property No....

Asa Ram Mukand Lal Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1999)64TTJ(Del)466

ORDERB.S. SALUM, J.M.:The assessed is aggrieved against the order of the CIT(A)-IV, New Delhi, dt. 1st June, 1993, pertaining to asst. yr. 1988-89 mainly on the ground of initiation of reassessment proceedings under s. 147(a) and...

Zunaid Enterprises and ors. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : VAT Act; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956

H.L. Dattu, Anil R. Dave, JJ.1. By this application, the applicants, who are appellants/petitioners in Civil Appeals @ SLP(C) Nos.13848-13868/2010 have prayed for incorporation of certain requests made in para nos.4 and 6 of the application....

Advocate's Association for Judicial Services, U.P. at Allahabad and ot ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1999(3)AWC2665; (1999)3UPLBEC1920

Advocate for Respondent : S.C.

M. Katju and Krishna Kumar, JJ.1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners. Sri S. K. Singh learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents and learned standing counsel.2. Petitioner No. 1 is an association of advocates whereas other...

Firm Gopal Company Ltd. and anr. Vs. Firm Hazarilal Company

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Contract

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 34 - Order 6, Rule 4 - Order 30, Rule 1; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 2 and 25; Interest Act, 1839 - Sections 1

Reported in : AIR1963MP37

Advocate for Respondent : A.P. Sen and ;A.H. Saifi, Advs.

Shrivastava, J.1. This appeal is by the defendants against the judgment in Civil Suit No. 14 of 1952 of the Court of the Additional District Judge, Bhopal, decided on 31-12-1958, decreeing the claim of the respondent...

Commissioner of Wealth-tax Vs. Shyam Lal

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 7(1)

Reported in : [1990]184ITR291(All)

Advocate for Respondent : C.S. Agarwal and ;Vikram Gulati, Advs.

1. We have heard Sri M. Katiu, learned counsel for the Commissioner of Wealth-tax and Sri C.S. Agarwal for the assessee. At the outset, Sri C.S. Agarwal raised a preliminary objection relying on a decision of...

Smt. Mahmooda Vs. District Judge, Bahraich and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 47 and 151 - Order 21, Rules 89 and 90; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 54 and 60; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 145

Reported in : 1998(4)AWC362

Advocate for Respondent : C.S.C., ;M. Afzal, ;A.N. Shukla, ;A.A. Zaidi and ;F.A. Khan, Advs.

S.H.A. Raza, J.1. Besides the other questions which are involved in the present writ petition, which I will deal later on, it will be necessary to dwell into the scope and ambit of the provisions contained...

Shanti Films Rep. by Its Proprietor K. Rajamanickam and R. Kavitha, Ka ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Intellectual Property RightsMedia and Communication

Acts : Partnership Act - Sections 69; Copyrights Act, 1957 - Sections 19; Notaries Act, 1952 - Sections 15; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 63 and 65; Notaries Rules, 1956 - Rule 11(2)

Reported in : LC2007(3)243

Advocate for Respondent : Chitra Sampath, Adv. for Defendants 1 and 2 in C.S. No. 765 of 1999, ;K. Chandrasekaran, Adv. for D1 in C.S. Nos. 305/97 and 173/99, ;N. Balasubramanian, Adv. for D2 in C.S. No. 305/97 and ;S.S. Shanm

M. Jeyapaul, J.1. C.S. No. 305 of 1997 has been filed by M/s. Shanti Films(i) for declaration that the plaintiff is the limited copyright owner of the 16mm Video and Television rights of the three Tamil...

In the Matter of a Reference by the Governor in Council Concerning Sec ...

Court : Canada Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

The Chief Justice and LeBel, Abella, Cromwell, Karakatsanis and Wagner JJ. ” I. Introduction [1] The Supreme Court Act provides that three of the nine judges of the Supreme Court of Canada must be appointed œfrom...

P.V.S.V. Prasada Rao and ors. Vs. Andhra University, Rep. by Its Regis ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Cochin University Act, 1971 - Sections 6, 6(1) and 6(2); Nagpur University Act, 1974 - Sections 11, 32, 32(2), 57, 57(4), 76, 77C and 84; Uttar Pradesh Public Services (Reservation for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and other Backward Classes) Act, 1994 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 3(5) and 4; Andhra Pradesh Universities Act, 1991 - Sections 5, 43(2) and 49; Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985; Andhra University Act, 1926; Andhra Pradesh Regulation of Reservation for Appointments to Public Services Act, 1997; Legal Practitioners Act - Sections 13; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11; Kerala State and Subordinate Service Rules - Rules 14 to 16 and 17; Andhra Pradesh State and Subordinate Services Rules, 1962 - Rules 2(18), 5 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15, 15(1),

Reported in : 2006(2)ALD1; 2006(1)ALT785

Advocate for Respondent : G.P. ;for Higher Education and ;D.V. Sitharama Murthy, ;C.C.S. Sastry, ;T.S. Harinath, ;P.B. Vijaya Kumar, ;L. Nanda Kishore, ;S. Srinivasa Reddy, ;G. Pedda Babu, ;G. Venugopal Reddy, ;K. Sarva Bhouma

ORDERJ. Chelameswar and Goda Raghuram, JJ.1. We have had the benefit of perusing the painstaking and meticulously crafted judgment of our learned brother Hon'ble Mr. Justice V.V.S. Rao. We agree with the OPERATIVE conclusion that the...