Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: c l puri · Page 1 of about 8 results (0.054 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 01 1953

Bakshi Sita Ram Vs. Lachhmi Chand and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-01-1953

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 439 and 561A

Reported in : AIR1954HP4

Advocate for Respondent : K.C. Pandit, Adv.

ORDERChowdhry, J.C.1. One Lachhmi Chand, a shop-keeper of Nahan, was convicted by the learned Additional District Magistrate of that place under Section 161, read with S. 116, I. P. C., for offering bribe to the Government...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 13 1952

Firm Mansa Ram Babu Ram Vs. Ganga Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jun-13-1952

Subject : Civil

Acts : Debt Law; Punjab Relif of Indebtedness Act, 1934 - Sections 20

Reported in : AIR1952P& H410

Advocate for Respondent : K.L. Jagga and; C.L. Puri, Advs.

Kapur, J.1. This is a decree-holders appeal against an appellate order of District Judge Bhagat Singh confirming the order passed in execution by Mr. Manohar Singh, Subordinate Judge, Hoshiarpur, dismissing the decree-holder's application for execution.2. Briefly...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 02 1951

Jagarnath and ors. Vs. Gayaroo and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-02-1951

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 9; ;Tenancy Law; ;Punjab Tenancy Act, 1887 - Section 77 and 77(3)

Reported in : AIR1951HP51

Advocate for Respondent : C.L. Puri, Adv.

ORDERChowdhry, J. 1. This reference is by the Subordinate Judge first class Kasumpti under Section 99, Punjab Tenancy Act (XVI [16] of 1887) because he enter, tains a doubt whether he is precluded from taking cognizance...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 24 1953

Balak Ram and ors. Vs. Sita Ram and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-24-1953

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 9

Reported in : AIR1954HP6

Advocate for Respondent : C.L. Puri, Adv.

Chowdhry, J.C. 1. This is a second appeal by three of the nine plaintiffs, the rest being im-pleaded as 'pro forma' respondents. The suit related to land, 52 bighas and 5 biswas in area, of which...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 07 1951

Lalla Ram Vs. Naresh Chand and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-07-1951

Subject : TenancyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 115 - Order 2, Rule 2; ;East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 - Sections 4 and 6(1)

Reported in : AIR1952HP28

Advocate for Respondent : C.L. Puri, Adv. for Respondent No. 1

ORDERChowdhry, J.C.1. This is a defendant's application for revision of the judgment and decree dated 11-6-1951 of the learned District Judge of Mahasu and Sirmur.2. The plaintiff-respondent filed two suits on one and the same date,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 06 1953

Chet Ram Vs. the State

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-06-1953

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 4(1), 195 and 476; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Section 228

Reported in : AIR1954HP32

Advocate for Respondent : C.L. Puri, Acting Govt. Adv.

ORDERChowdhry, J.C.1. Chet Ram, alias Chattru, was convicted by the learned Magistrate first class Rampur for an offence punishable under Section 228, Penal Code, and sentenced to a fine of Rs. 20/-(and not Rs. 200/-, as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 10 1953

Sadh Ram Vs. State

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-10-1953

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act, 1878 - Section 22; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 241, 254, 255, 256 and 537

Reported in : AIR1953HP121

Advocate for Respondent : C.L. Puri, Acting Govt. Adv.

ORDERChowdhry, J.C. 1. This is a reference under Section 438, Cr. P. C., by the learned Sessions Judge of Mahasu and Sirmur, recommending that the conviction of Sadh Ram for an offence under Section 22, Arms...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 28 1953

R.N. Mohindra Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : May-28-1953

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 311; ;Civil Service (Classification Control and Appeal) Rules - Rule 55

Reported in : AIR1953HP125

Advocate for Respondent : C.L. Puri, Ag. Govt. Adv.

ORDERChowdhry, J.C.1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution by one B. N. Mohindra, one time employee of the respondent, the State of Himachal Pradesh, in the medical department, whose services were terminated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial