Advanced Search Results

Shyama Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Indian Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5

Reported in : 2000(3)WLC633; 2000(2)WLN365

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. C.L. Jain, Adv.

ORDERShethna, J.(1). Main Writ Petition No. 1129/99 was dismissed by me on 31.8.99. The said order was initially challenged by the petitioner before the Division Bench of this Court by way of special appeal filed on...

Bhagirath and anr. Vs. Board of Revenue and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Property

Acts : Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 - Sections 9 and 84; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 2000(3)WLC188; 2000(2)WLN292

Advocate for Respondent : C.L. Jain and; C.R. Jakhar, Advs.

ORDERShethna, J.(1). All these petitions are disposed of by this common order as common question of law is involved in these petitions.(2). Learned counsel Sh. Sharma for the petitioners in all these petitions submitted that Settlement...

Naga Ram and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Property

Acts : Rajasthan Land Revenue (Allotment of Land for Agriculture Purposes) Rules, 1970

Reported in : 2001(2)WLC148; 2001(2)WLN631

Advocate for Respondent : C.L. Jain, Adv.

ORDERShethna, J.(1). Notice to the respondents.(2). Learned counsel Mr. C.L. Jain, who appeared before the learned Single Judge for the respondents, who was present in the Court, was directed to accept notice for the respondents.(3). At...

Rasid Ahmed and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : AIR1999Raj314; 1999(1)WLN612

Advocate for Respondent : C.L. Jain, Adv.

ORDERB.J. Shethna, J. 1. All these petitions are disposed of by this common order as the points involved in all these petitions are same.2. On the information that illegal excavation is going on, the mining officers...

M/s. S.K. Metal and Co. and Another Vs. Commissioner of Customs and Ot ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Dr. S. Muralidhar, J. 1. A common question that arises for consideration in both these writ petitions is about the liability of an importer to pay demurrage/godown rent and container charges under circumstances in which the...

Smt. Rami Bai Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Insurance

Acts : Insurance Act, 1938 - Sections 45; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 67 and 68; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 17 and 22

Reported in : AIR1981MP69

Advocate for Respondent : S. Awasthy, Adv.

U.N. Bhachawat, J.1. This appeal is by the plaintiff against the judgment and decree dated the 31st of January,1976 of the Court of Second Additional District Judge, Bhopal. in regular Civil Suit No. 28-B of 1973,...

Dy. Commissioner Vs. Ramesh Kumari and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948 - Sections 14, 19, 20, 21, 21(1), 21(2), 21(3), 23, 30, 36 and 42; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 379, 427 and 447; Constitution of India - Article 226; Delhi Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Rules, 1959 - Rules 3(2), 4(2) and 6

Reported in : 156(2009)DLT133

Advocate for Respondent : Sanjay Jain, Sr. Adv. and ; Pankaj Vivek, Adv. for R-1 in W.P.(C) 7687/2004, ;

S. Muralidhar, J.Introduction1. The subject matter of all these petitions is land to an extent of over 40 bighas in Village Kapashera, New Delhi belonging to the Deputy Commissioner (South-West) ('DC'), Government of National Territory of...

Naga Ram and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Property

Reported in : 2007(2)WLN348

Rajesh Balia, J.1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. A request has been made by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the name of respondent No. 5 be deleted as he is not necessary party...

Modern Rubber Industries Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 155; Customs Rules; Customs Regulations

Reported in : 2003(2)ALLMR303; 2003(154)ELT571(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : A.C. Singh and ;D.A. Dube, Advs., i/b., T.C. Kaushik, Adv. and ;S.I. Shah, Adv.

ORDERV.C, Daga, J. 1. The petitioner is a sole proprietary concern, inter alia, engaged in the business of retailing and retreading of tyres. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking declaration and consequent direction holding Customs...

State of Rajsthan and ors. Vs. Prem Shankar and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Property

Reported in : 2003(2)WLC519; 2003(1)WLN149

N.N. Mathur, J.1. Being aggrieved by the part of the order of learned Single Judge dated 24.03.2000 to the extent that while relegating the respondents-writ petitioenrs to the alternate remedy of revenue suit learned Single Judge...