Advanced Search Results

Pure Drinks Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Limitation Act, 1961 - Schedule - Article 115; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 34 and 80

Reported in : 1987(3)BomCR231; 1989(22)LC589(Bombay)

Advocate for Respondent : C.J. Shah, Adv. and ;T.R. Rao, A.G.P.

Sujata V. Manohar, J.1. The plaintiffs manufacture soft drinks i.e. non alcoholic beverages and carbonated beverages. At all material times they marketed their products under the name of Coca Cola, Fanta and Soda Special.2. Prior to...

N. Vajrapani Naidu and anr. Vs. the New theatre Carnatic Talkies Ltd. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Madras City Tenants Protection Act, 1922 - Sections 9 and 12; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1) and 31

Reported in : AIR1964SC1440; [1964]6SCR1015

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 264 of 1962. Appeal from the judgment and order dated April 24, 1959 of the Madras High Court in L.P.A. No. 75 of 1958. A. V. Viswanatha Sastri and R....

Ben Gorm Nilgiri Plantations Company, Coonoor and ors. Vs. Sales Tax O ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 5; Constitution of India - Article 286(1)

Reported in : AIR1964SC1752; [1964]7SCR706; [1964]15STC753(SC)

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeals Nos. 396-413 of 1963. Appeals by special leave from the judgment and order dated October 26, 1961 of the Kerala High Court in Writ Appeals Nos. 104-106, 107, 109, 112, 108,...

Bhawani Cotton Mills Ltd. Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : East Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 2 and 4 to 6; East Punjab General Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, 1952 - Sections 5; Sale of Goods Act, 1930; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 15

Reported in : AIR1967SC1616; (1967)69PLR100; [1967]3SCR577; [1967]20STC290(SC)

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Apppeals Nos. 2386 2388 of 1966. Appeals from the judgment and order dated November 23. 1965 of the Punjab High Court in Civil Writ Nos. 1591 of 1963 and 1913 and...

Shri Vallabh Pitte Vs. Narsingdas Govindram Kalani

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 20(4), 21, 28, 30, 31, 31(4), 32 and 33

Reported in : AIR1963Bom157; (1963)65BOMLR29; ILR1962Bom743; 1963MhLJ841

Advocate for Respondent : C.J. Shah and ;A.N. Samant, Advs., i/b., Samant and Co. Attorneys

Patel, J.1. This appeal raises the much vexed question as to the validity of an award given in a case by arbitrators where the jurisdiction of the arbitrators is challenged. The short facts are as follows;...

Hotel Mazdoor Sabha and anr. Vs. N.J. Alvares and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bombay shops and Establishments Act, 1948 - Sections 2(25)

Reported in : AIR1965Bom13; (1964)66BOMLR332; ILR1965Bom87

Advocate for Respondent : C.J. Shah and ;S.J. Sorabji, Advs.

ORDER(1) In this Petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution, the Petitioners have claimed direction against Respondent 1, 'Chief Inspector, Shops and Establishments', and the State Government to apply the provisions of the Bombay Shops and...

Hotel Mazdoor Sabha Vs. Alvares N.J. and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 - Sections 2(25); Indian Trade Unions Act

Reported in : 1964MhLJ540

Advocate for Respondent : C.J. Shah, ;A.M. Desai and ;S.J. Sorabji, Advs.

1. In this petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution, the petitioners have claimed directions against respondent 1, 'Chief Inspector, Shops and Establishments,' and the State Government to apply the provisions of the Bombay Shops and...

Union of India Vs. Rakesh Enterprises

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Central Excise Act

Reported in : 1991LC23(Bombay); 1991(56)ELT39(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Shri Dr. N.R. Kantawala, Adv., i/b ;M/s. Kantawala & Co.

Bharucha, J. 1. The learned single Judge allowed the writ petition filed by the respondents. The appeal is filed the reagainst, and we may at once mention that the appeal is devoid of merit. 2. The...

Municipal Corporation of Greator Bombay Vs. Forage and Co.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888

Reported in : (1987)89BOMLR301; 1987MhLJ623

Advocate for Respondent : H.V. Cala, Adv.

Bharucha, J.1. This is an appeal against the judgement and order making the writ petition of the respondents (original petitioners) absolute. The respondents manufacture Zinc Oxide at a factory in the State of Gujarat. They bring...

C.J. Shah and Others Vs. Brij Mohan Wadhwa and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1992(1)BomCR322; 1991CriLJ1906

Advocate for Respondent : A.S. Khandeparkar, Adv.

ORDER1. This is an application under section 482 of the Cr.P.C. in which the petitioners No. 1 to 7 pray for the quashing of the order of issue of process against them under section 204 of...