Advanced Search Results

Trimex International Fze Ltd. Dubai Vs. Vedanta Aluminium Ltd., India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ArbitrationContract

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 4, 7 and 11(6); Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 4 and 7

Reported in : JT2010(1)SC474; 2010(1)SCALE574; (2010)3SCC1; 2010(2)LC655(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : C.A. Sundaram, Sr. Adv., ; Rohini Musa, ; Abhishek Gupta

ORDERM/s Trimex International FZEDubaiSub: Purchase Order for supply of Low Monohydrate Grade BauxiteRef: Offer No. TID/F/223/2007, Dated 15.10.2007 and our subsequent discussions held there on.Dear Sir, With reference to the above offer and subsequent discussions we...

Techmo Car Spa Vs. the Madras Aluminium Company Ltd. Represented by It ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Administration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 37

Reported in : 2004(2)ARBLR284(Madras); IV(2004)BC101; [2005]123CompCas533(Mad); 2004(3)CTC754; [2004]54SCL100(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : C.A. Sundaram, Sr. Counsel for ;S. Raghunathan, Adv.

P. Sathasivam, J.1. Aggrieved by the order of the Additional District Judge, Salem dated 22-10-2003, made in Arbitration O.P.No. 46 of 2003, Techmo Car SPA, Italy has filed the above appeal under Section 37 of the...

Jindal Vijayanagar Steel (Jsw Steel Ltd.) Vs. Jindal Praxair Oxygen Co ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2, 2(1), 9, 21, 37(1) and 42; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 2 and 42; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 16, 17, 20, 120, 141 and 151; Letters Patent Act; Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953; Haryana Urban Control of Rent and Eviction Act; Constitution of India - Articles 225 and 226

Reported in : 2006(3)ARBLR340(SC); 2006(6)BomCR309; [2006]134CompCas119(SC); JT2006(8)SC230; 2006(8)SCALE668; (2005)11SCC521; 2006AIRSCW5130

Advocate for Respondent : C.A. Sundaram, Sr. Adv., ; R.K. Krishnamurthi, ; Rahul Narich

AR. Lakshmanan, J.1. Leave granted.2. The above appeal was filed by the appellant seeking special leave to appeal against the final order dated 02.03.2006 passed by the High Court of Bombay in Arbitration Petition No. 459...

Radhika Narang and ors. Vs. Kuldeep Narang and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 - Sections 3, 4, 18, 19, 20, 26, 27, 28 and 33; Domestic Violence Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 9 and 108 - Order 1, Rule 10 - Order 2, Rule 2 - Order 7, Rule 11 - Order 10 - Order 14, Rule 2; Hindu Law; Mulla's Hindu Law; Mitakashara Law

Reported in : 156(2009)DLT637

Advocate for Respondent : C.A. Sundaram, Sr. Adv. and ; Shailen Bhatia, Adv. for R-2

Manmohan, J.1. The Appellant daughter-in-law has filed the present appeal against the order dated 16th November, 2004 passed in Suit No. 1225 of 2003 whereby the learned Single Judge while deciding a preliminary issue has held...

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Vs. Nepc India Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433 and 434

Reported in : [2003]41SCL493(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : C.A. Sundaram, Adv.

N.V. Balasubramanian, J.1. This petition is filed under Section 433(e), read with Section 434 of the Companies Act, 1956, hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'. The petitioner is a public sector undertaking. The respondent is M/s....

M.P. Housing Board Vs. Progressive Writers and Publishers

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Contract

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 23, 30 and 39; Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : AIR2009SC1585; 2009(3)AWC2618(SC); JT2009(4)SC219; (2009)5MLJ145(SC); 2009(4)SCALE119; (2009)5SCC678:2009AIRSCW2484

Advocate for Respondent : C.A. Sundaram, Sr. Adv., ; Sushil Kumar Jain, ; Puneet Jain, ;

B. Sudershan Reddy, J.1. On February 18, 1975 the M.P. Housing Board (for short `the Board') and Progressive Writers and Publishers, New Delhi (hereinafter called as the `depositor') entered into an agreement whereunder the Board agreed...

Atlas Cycles (Haryana) Ltd. Vs. Atlas Products Pvt. Ltd. and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 17; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 22 and 22(1); Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 12(3) and 28; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1999

Reported in : 101(2002)DLT324; [2003]47SCL304(Delhi)

Advocate for Respondent : C.A. Sundaram, Sr. Adv., ; Anuradha Dutt and ; Ekta Kapil

D.K. Jain, J. 1. The plaintiff, M/s. Atlas Cycle (Haryana) Limited, a public limited company, has filed this suit praying for a decree of permanent injunction restraining the defendants from using their trade mark 'ATLAS' or...

Pasupati Fabrics Ltd. and ors. Vs. Priyanka Overseas Pvt. Ltd. and ors ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : SICA

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 3, 3(1), 15 to 19, 22, 23, 25, 26, 32, 32(1), 33 and 62(6); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 16(4), 19(1), 19(2), 81(1), 100-103, 111A, 391 to 394 and 397-409; Securities and Exchange Board of India Act - Sections 2; Securities and Exchange Board of India Regulations; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973; Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act,1976; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 72A; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Regulations - Regulation 19

Reported in : [2006]132CompCas113(Delhi); (2006)2CompLJ360(Del); 2006(86)DRJ6

Advocate for Respondent : C.A. Sundaram, Sr. Adv. and ; Rishi Agrawala, Adv. in Co. A. (SB) Nos. 18 and 20/2005 and ;

A.K. Sikri, J.1. Pasupati Fabrics Ltd. (hereinafter called as `the company') was incorporated as a public limited company in the year 1991. Barely within 10 years of its existence, its net worth was fully eroded. It...

Paras Corporation Vs. Union of India

Court : Chennai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 142; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1993(41)ECC39; 1993LC50(Madras); 1992(61)ELT409(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : Shri C.A. Sundaram, Addl. C.G.S.C.

ORDER1. Both the petitions are filed to quash the orders of adjudication passed by the Additional Collector of Customs, Bombay. 2. Notice of motion has been ordered in both the writ petitions on 21-1-1992. 3. Mr....

Tata Tea Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs, Madras

Court : Chennai

Subject : Customs

Reported in : 1994(69)ELT219(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. C.A. Sundaram, Addl. Central Govt. Standing Counsel

ORDER1. The petitioner is engaged in the growing, manufacture and sale of Tea including instant Tea Powder. The instant Tea Division has been exporting its entire production, to the general currency areas. For the purpose of...